Cited by 33School Choice and PerformanceEducation during COVID-19 pandemicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

The Fiscal and Welfare Effects of Policy Responses to the Covid-19 School Closures

Open access
Fuchs-Schündeln, Nicola, Krueger, Dirk, Kurmann, André, Lalé, Etienne, Ludwig, Alexander, Popova, Irina·2023·IMF Economic Review

Abstract

Based on data on school visits from Safegraph and on school closures from Burbio, we document that during the Covid-19 crisis secondary schools were closed for in-person learning for longer periods than elementary schools, private schools experienced shorter closures than public schools, and schools in poorer US counties experienced shorter school closures. To quantify the long-run consequences of these school closures, we extend the structural life cycle model of private and public schooling investments by Fuchs-Schündeln et al. (Econ J 132:1647–1683, 2022) to include private school choice and feed into the model the school closure measures from our empirical analysis. Future earnings and welfare losses are largest for children that started public secondary schools at the onset of the Covid-19 crisis. Comparing children from the top to children from the bottom quartile of the income distribution, welfare losses are 0.5 percentage points larger for the poorer children if school closures were unrelated to income. Accounting for the longer school closures in richer counties reduces this gap by about 1/4. A policy intervention that extends schools by 6 weeks generates significant welfare gains for children and raises future tax revenues sufficient to pay for the cost of this schooling expansion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41308-022-00196-2

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Fuchs-Schündeln et al. (2021), the effects are largest for younger children.

    “The effects are largest for younger children, an implication that follows from two features of the skill accumulation technology emphasized in Section 3, namely selfproductivity (investments today increase human capital tomorrow) and dynamic complementarity (investments today increase the marginal productivity of further investments tomorrow).”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Fuchs-Schündeln et al. (2021)

    The Results section (“Young and Old Children”) says younger children are more adversely affected when the length of school closures is held constant, and links this to self-productivity and dynamic complementarity. The claim omits that condition: accounting for longer secondary-school closures, the paper says the youngest secondary-school children are most severely affected. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Fuchs-Schündeln et al. (2021), earnings and welfare losses will be largest for children who started public secondary schools at the onset of the crisis.

    “Extending their earlier life cycle model to include the choice of parents between public and private school options, the authors predict that the earnings-and welfare losses will be largest for children who started public secondary schools at the onset of the crisis.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Fuchs-Schündeln et al. (2021)

  • In Fuchs-Schündeln et al. (2021), these changes diminish the average lifetime earnings of the affected children by about one percent.

    “These changes diminish the average lifetime earnings of the affected children by about one percent.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Fuchs-Schündeln et al. (2021)

  • In Jang and Yum (2020), the effects on intergenerational mobility are larger for older children, who have less time to compensate for learning losses through greater time investments.

    “In contrast to the findings of Fuchs-Schündeln et al. (2021), these effects turn out to be larger for older children, who have less time to compensate for learning losses through greater time investments.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Fuchs-Schündeln et al. (2021)

  • In Fuchs-Schündeln et al. (2021), the welfare loss is non-monotonic in parental education, being strongest for children with high school educated parents rather than for those whose parents did not complete high school.

    “This implies that the welfare loss is non-monotonic in parental education, being strongest for children with high school educated parents (who have sizeable college completion rates) rather than for those whose parents did not complete high school (whose attendance rates were low even before the pandemic).”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Fuchs-Schündeln et al. (2021)

    The Introduction and Results passages report welfare losses by age, school type, and parental income, but not the claimed ranking by parental education. The Calibration > Preferences passage discusses parental education and college completion without comparing welfare losses for children of high-school-educated parents and parents who did not complete high school. Searches for that comparison and for a non-monotonic pattern found no passage establishing it in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Liyaghatdar Z Pezeshkian Z Mohammadi-Dehcheshmeh M Ebrahimie E Fast school closures correspond with a lower rate of COVID-19 incidence and deaths in most countries Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 2021 27 9 1 6 PMC8607689 34849394

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuchs-Schündeln, N., Krueger, D., Kurmann, A., Lalé, E., Ludwig, A., & Popova, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Krueger, Dirk
Venue
IMF Economic Review
Published
2023-02-08
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
35-98
ISSN
  • 2041-4161 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-417X
OpenAlex
W3208933762
Cited by
33
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1
FWCI
12.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IMF Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (SES-1757084)
  • H2020 European Research Council (Consolidator Grant No. 815378)
  • NORFACE (TRISP 462-16-120)
  • DFG (Leipnizpreis)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 school closures, private school choice, future earnings, welfare loss, income inequality, tax revenue, educational expansion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review