CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses

van den Wildenberg, Wery P.M, van der Molen, Maurits W·2004·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.jecp.2003.11.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined age-related change in the ability to inhibit responses using two varieties of the stop signal paradigm. Three age groups (29 7-year-olds, 24 10-year-olds, and 28 young adults) performed first on a visual choice reaction task in which the spatial mapping between the go signal and response was varied between blocks. The choice task was then complicated by randomly inserting a visual stop signal on 30% of the trials. In the simple stop signal paradigm, the stop signal required the inhibition of the planned response. In the selective stop signal paradigm, the stop signal required response inhibition only when the stop signal was presented at the same side as the instructed response to the go signal. The results showed that simple stopping was faster than selective stopping and that selective, but not simple, stopping of incompatible responses was slower than stopping of compatible responses. Brinley plot analysis yielded linear functions relating children's latencies to adults' latencies. Analysis of shared variance indicated that developmental change in the speed of selective stopping continued to be significant even when the effect associated with simple stopping was removed. This pattern of findings is discussed vis-à-vis notions of global versus specific developmental trends in the speed of information processing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2003.11.003

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Oosterlaan, J. (1996). Response inhibition in children with attention deficit hyperactivity and related disorders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & van der Molen, M. W.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
201-220
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jecp.2003.11.003
OpenAlex
W1990304837
Cited by
122
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
response inhibition, stop-signal task, developmental changes, children, choice reaction time, processing speed
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Child, Child Development, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Mental Processes, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review