The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co-creation and user innovation: The role of online 3D printing platforms
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this article is to investigate the changes brought about by online 3D printing platforms in co-creation and user innovation. As doing so requires a thorough understanding of the level of user involvement in productive processes and a clear view of the nature of co-creative processes, this article provides a ‘prosumption’ framework and a typology of co-creation activities. Then, based on case studies of 22 online 3D printing platforms, a service-based taxonomy of these platforms is constructed. The taxonomy and typology are then matched to investigate the role played by online 3D platforms in regard to the various types of co-creation activities and, consequently, how this impacts user innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Designing Virtual Customer Environments for New Product Development: Toward a Theory
Nambisan, S. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389914 · Cited by 1,026
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Baldwin, 2006, How user innovations become commercial products: a theoretical investigation and case study?, Res. Policy, 35, 1291, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012 · DOI · Paper page
- Berthon, 2008, Ad lib: when customers create the ad?, Calif. Manage. Rev., 50, 6, 10.2307/41166454 · DOI · Paper page
- Berthon, 2007, When customers get clever: managerial approaches to dealing with creative consumers?, Bus. Horiz., 50, 39, 10.1016/j.bushor.2006.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Bogers, 2010, Users as innovators: a review, critique, and future research directions, J. Manage., 36, 857
- Eisenhardt, 1989, Building theories from case study research, Acad. Manage. Rev., 14, 532, 10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 · DOI · Paper page
- Kotler, 1986, The prosumer movement: a new challenge for marketers?, Adv. Consum. Res., 13, 510
- Lettl, 2007, User involvement competence for radical innovation?, J. Eng. Technol. Manage., 24, 53, 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Payne, 2009, Co-creating brands: diagnosing and designing the relationship experience?, J. Bus. Res., 62, 379, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, vol. 1
- Poetz, 2012, The value of crowdsourcing: can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas?, J. Prod. Innov. Manage., 29, 245, 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00893.x · DOI · Paper page
- Prahalad, 2004, Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation?, J. Interact. Market., 18, 5, 10.1002/dir.20015 · DOI · Paper page
- Rayna, 2009, The curse of the first-mover: when incremental innovation leads to radical change?, Int. J. Collab. Enterp., 1, 4, 10.1504/IJCENT.2009.026453 · DOI
- Ritzer, 2010, Production, consumption, prosumption: the nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’, J. Consum. Cult., 10, 13, 10.1177/1469540509354673 · DOI · Paper page
- Sawhney, 2000, Communities of creation: managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets?, Calif. Manage. Rev., 42, 24, 10.2307/41166052 · DOI · Paper page
- Shah, 2007, The accidental entrepreneur: the emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship?, Strateg. Entrep. J., 1, 123, 10.1002/sej.15 · DOI · Paper page
- Stieglitz, 2007, Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm?, Strateg. Manage. J., 28, 1, 10.1002/smj.565 · DOI · Paper page
- Zwass, 2010, Co-creation: toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective?, Int. J. Electron. Commer., 15, 11, 10.2753/JEC1086-4415150101 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018 · Cited by 3,089
Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship
Nambisan, S. (2017) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12254 · Cited by 2,771
Circular futures: what will they look like
Bauwens, T., Hekkert, M., & Kirchherr, J. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106703 · Cited by 279
A review on customizing edible food materials into 3D printable inks: Approaches and strategies
Pulatsu, E., & Lin, M. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.11.023 · Cited by 112
ICTs in the transformation of rural enterprises in China: A multi-layer perspective
Zhou, Q., Gao, P., & Chimhowu, A. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.026 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Rayna, T., Striukova, L., & Darlington, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 37
- Pages
- 90-102
- ISSN
- 0923-4748 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2338069180
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 44.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor, 44 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Co-creation and user innovation: The role of online 3D printing platforms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.07.002
- The paper
- Rayna, T., Striukova, L., & Darlington, J. (2015). Co-creation and user innovation: The role of online 3D printing platforms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.07.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
