Cited by 41Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesSkin Protection and AgingEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

Valorization of agri-food waste through the extraction of bioactive molecules. Prediction of their sunscreen action

Open access
Martínez-Inda, Blanca, Esparza, Irene, Moler, José Antonio, Jiménez-Moreno, Nerea, Ancín-Azpilicueta, Carmen·2023·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

The aim of this work was to identify the phenolic composition of 18 different vegetable residues and to determine the relationship between their phenolic compounds, antioxidant capacity and sun protection factor. For this purpose, samples of agri-food residues were analyzed to quantify their antioxidant capacity, total polyphenol and flavonoid content, sun protection factor and individual phenolic compounds through HPLC-DAD-FLD. Among the different phenolic compounds found in the extracts, the phenolic acids, especially caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, p-coumaric acid and protocatechuic acid were the ones that have been most frequently identified, and, therefore, are present in a wide range of extracts. Black chai tea, lemon ginger tea and peanut extracts were the most antioxidant and photoprotective extracts. Phenolic compounds in the extracts have been found to contribute to their antioxidant activity and are closely correlated to their photoprotective capacity. A regression model that allows predicting the photoprotective capacity of any extract based on its total phenol content has been developed as a tool to determine the most suitable industrial application for each vegetable extract.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116460

Cites

49 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martínez-Inda, B., Esparza, I., Moler, J. A., Jiménez-Moreno, N., & Ancín-Azpilicueta, C.
Affiliations
Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES)
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
325
Issue
Pt B
Pages
116460
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307068782
Cited by
41
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Academica-e (Universidad Pública de Navarra) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Universidad Pública de Navarra
  • Gobierno de Navarra (PC093-094 FORINSEC)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
agri-food waste valorization, vegetable residues, phenolic compounds, antioxidant capacity, sun protection factor, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, p-coumaric acid, protocatechuic acid, flavonoids, peanut extract
MeSH terms
Antioxidants, Food, Phenols, Plant Extracts, Refuse Disposal, Sunscreening Agents, Tea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review