Cited by 531Media Influence and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Advancing Tailored Health Communication: A Persuasion and Message Effects Perspective

Rimer, Barbara K., Kreuter, Matthew W.·2006·Journal of Communication

Abstract

Tailored health communication (THC) is any combination of information and behavior change strategies intended to reach one specific person based on information unique to that person, related to the outcome of interest, and derived from an individual assessment. THCs have been studied as a means to facilitate behavior change by influencing some key intermediate steps that precede the behavioral outcome. These include the extent to which people attend to communications, think about them, find them relevant and salient, and intend to take action. Evidence shows that THCs have achieved modest success in changing a number of cancer-related behaviors, including smoking, diet, exercise, and cancer screening. However, it is likely that THCs could be more effective if they were developed with a greater understanding of message effects and what we refer to as the behavioral pathway. Instead of using unidimensional approaches to influence behavior change, a message effects approach would help researchers identify key leverage points for impact on such intermediate outcomes as persuasion and yielding. Such a strategy also might be used to determine when THCs are the preferred approach and when generic, targeted, or combinations of THCs and targeted communications might be appropriate. Viewing THCs from the perspective of the behavioral pathway might indicate use of different messages, sources, and formats to influence different people at different points on the pathway. We provide a brief history of THCs and suggest how integrating a broader perspective of health behavior and health communication theories could enrich THCs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00289.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conveying health information without considering individual differences may inhibit behavior change.

    “Experts in health behavior change have shown that conveying health information without considering individual differences may inhibit behavior change [20-26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rimer, B. K., & Kreuter, M. W.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
56
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
S184-S201
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
OpenAlex
W1973492382
Cited by
531
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 23
FWCI
323.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Saint Louis University
  • Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
tailored health communication, message effects, persuasion, behavioral pathways, health behavior change, smoking, diet, physical activity, cancer screening, targeted communication, health communication theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review