CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 632Pro-Environmental Behavior and AttitudesClimate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate Change Policy and Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts

Whitmarsh, Lorraine·2009·Journal of Environmental Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.003

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Abrahamse, 2005, A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bamberg, 2003, Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students' car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis, Environment and Behavior, 35, 264, 10.1177/0013916502250134 · DOI
  3. Black, 2001, Encouraging walking: the case of journey-to-school trips in compact urban areas, Urban Studies, 38, 1121, 10.1080/00420980124102 · DOI
  4. Black, 1985, Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 3, 10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.3 · DOI
  5. Bord, 2000, In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?, Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205, 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301 · DOI
  6. Bostrom, 1994, What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models, Risk Analysis, 14, 959, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00065.x · DOI
  7. Brandon, 1999, Reducing household energy consumption: a qualitative and quantitative field study, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 75, 10.1006/jevp.1998.0105 · DOI
  8. Clark, 2003, Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: participation in a green electricity program, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 237, 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00105-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Darier, 1999, 'Think globally, act Locally'? Climate change and public participation in Manchester and Frankfurt, Local Environment, 4, 317, 10.1080/13549839908725602 · DOI
  10. Fortner, 2000, Public understanding of climate change: certainty and willingness to act, Environmental Education Research, 6, 127, 10.1080/713664673 · DOI
  11. Gatersleben, 2002, Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior, Environment and Behavior, 34, 335, 10.1177/0013916502034003004 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Henriksen, 2001, High school students' understanding of radiation and the environment: can museums play a role?, Science Education, 85, 189, 10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<189::AID-SCE60>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  13. King, 2004, Climate change science: adapt, mitigate, or ignore?, Science, 303, 176, 10.1126/science.1094329 · DOI
  14. Kollmuss, 2002, Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior, Environmental Education Research, 8, 239, 10.1080/13504620220145401 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Kurz, 2005, The ways that people talk about natural resources: discursive strategies as barriers to environmentally sustainable practices, British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 603, 10.1348/014466604X18064 · DOI
  16. Lindenberg, 2007, Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior, Journal of Social Issues, 63, 117, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x · DOI
  17. Lorenzoni, 2006, Cross national comparisons of image associations with ‘global warming’ and ‘climate change’ among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain, Journal of Risk Research, 9, 265, 10.1080/13669870600613658 · DOI
  18. Lorenzoni, 2007, Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications, Global Environmental Change, 17, 445, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004 · DOI
  19. McKenzie-Mohr, 1994, Social marketing for sustainability: the case of residential energy-conservation, Futures, 26, 224, 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90111-2 · DOI
  20. Nilsson, 2004, Willingness to accept climate change strategies: the effect of values and norms, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 267, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.06.002 · DOI
  21. O'Connor, 1999, Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change, Risk Analysis, 19, 461, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00421.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. O'Connor, 2002, Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?, Social Science Quarterly, 83, 1, 10.1111/1540-6237.00067 · DOI
  23. van der Pligt, 1985, Energy conservation: two easy ways out, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 3, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00890.x · DOI
  24. Poortinga, 2004, Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: a study into household energy use, Environment and Behavior, 36, 70, 10.1177/0013916503251466 · DOI
  25. Read, 1994, What do people know about global climate change? 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople, Risk Analysis, 14, 971, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00066.x · DOI
  26. Schultz, 1995, Who recycles and when: a review of personal and situational factors, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 105, 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90019-5 · DOI
  27. Snelgar, 2006, Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: measurement and structure, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 87, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.06.003 · DOI
  28. Steg, 2001, Instrumental-reasoned and symbolic-affective motives for using a motor car, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 4, 151, 10.1016/S1369-8478(01)00020-1 · DOI
  29. Stoll-Kleemann, 2001, The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups, Global environmental change, 11, 107, 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00061-3 · DOI
  30. Tanner, 1999, Constraints on environmental behaviour, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 145, 10.1006/jevp.1999.0121 · DOI
  31. Thøgersen, 1996, Recycling and morality: a critical review of the literature, Environment and Behavior, 28, 536, 10.1177/0013916596284006 · DOI
  32. Verplanken, 1998, Habit versus planned behaviour: a field experiment, British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 111, 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01160.x · DOI
  33. Whitmarsh, L. (2005). A study of public understanding of and response to climate change in the South of England. Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK, unpublished doctoral thesis.
  34. Whitmarsh, 2008, Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response, Journal of Risk Research, 11, 351, 10.1080/13669870701552235 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 632

Metadata

Authors
Whitmarsh, L.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Whitmarsh, Lorraine
ORCID
Whitmarsh, Lorraine
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
13-23
ISSN
0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.003
OpenAlex
W2038316962
Cited by
632
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 36
FWCI
86.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
climate change mitigation, pro-environmental behavior, energy conservation, recycling, public behavior, energy consumption indicators, climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review