Cited by 216Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityOrganic Food and AgricultureConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Who Buys Oddly Shaped Food and Why? Impacts of Food Shape Abnormality and Organic Labeling on Purchase Intentions

Loebnitz, Natascha, Schuitema, Geertje, Grunert, Klaus G.·2015·Psychology & Marketing

Abstract

Even without official quality standards, food retailers generally do not offer abnormally shaped food based on the assumption that consumers reject food that deviates physically from some norm. Because this practice contributes significantly to food waste, the current study tests this assumption experimentally. A representative sample of 964 Danish consumers indicated their purchase intentions for two fruits and two vegetables with varying levels of food shape abnormality (normal, moderately abnormal, and extremely abnormal) and organic labels (organic label, no label). Food shape abnormalities influence consumers’ purchase intentions, but only if the food deviates extremely from the norm; no differences in purchase intentions emerge for moderately abnormal food. Awareness of food waste issues and proenvironmental self-identities also drive purchase intentions, such that participants with high levels of these traits express significantly higher purchase intentions for abnormally shaped food. Thus, increasing awareness of food waste issues, particularly among those with strong proenvironmental self-identities, might encourage more consumers to purchase abnormally shaped fruits and vegetables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mar.20788

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loebnitz, N., Schuitema, G., & Grunert, K. G.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Loebnitz, Natascha
Venue
Psychology & Marketing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-10
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
408-421
ISSN
0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1919429638
Cited by
216
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
18.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology and Marketing (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission (LEANGREENFOOD) (238084)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
organic labeling, purchase intention, food waste, food waste awareness, fruits and vegetables, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review