The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In one experiment, Republicans received a message indicating that a clear majority of fellow Republicans agreed that the climate is changing and are taking action to combat climate change. These individuals — relative to those who did not receive this message — were more likely to report believing in climate change and to have climate-friendly intentions323,324.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [323]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the consensus messages in this study decreased ideological polarization by being more effective among conservatives than among liberals.”
From Factual belief polarization between Democrats and Republicans: source or epiphenomenon of ideological and affective polarization? (2024) · cites this paper as Van der Linden et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“another study, however, found that consensus messages effectively increased people's belief in global warming, as well as their support for climate action (Van der Linden et al., 2019).”
From Factual belief polarization between Democrats and Republicans: source or epiphenomenon of ideological and affective polarization? (2024) · cites this paper as Van der Linden et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 · Cited by 11,335
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046408 · Cited by 4,819
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Panagopoulos, 2016, Consensus cues, issue salience and policy preferences: An experimental investigation, North American Journal of Psychology, 18, 405
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 267
Buchanan, T., Ackland, J., Lloyd, S., van der Linden, S., & de‐Wit, L. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03262-2 · Cited by 15
Andreotta, M., Boschetti, F., Farrell, S., Paris, C. L., Walker, I. A., & Hurlstone, M. J. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03437-5 · Cited by 23
Communication and Deliberation for Environmental Governance
Erbaugh, J. T., Chang, C. H., Masuda, Y. J., & Ribot, J. (2024) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-082450 · Cited by 27
Sloane, J. D., & Wiles, J. R. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5960 · Cited by 15
Eiseman, D. L., Armstrong, A. K., & Chatrchyan, A. M. (2020) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2020.1811841 · Cited by 17
Pre-registered replication of the gateway belief model – Results from a representative German sample
Said, N., Frauhammer, L. T., & Huff, M. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101910 · Cited by 12
Rule-Governed Behavior and Climate Change: Why Climate Warnings Fail to Motivate Sufficient Action
Pietras, C. J. (2022) · Behavior and Social Issues · doi:10.1007/s42822-022-00109-y · Cited by 17
Suh, S. M., Chapman, D. A., & Lickel, B. A. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.02.003 · Cited by 17
Sherman, D. K., & Leaf Van Boven, A. (2023) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12104 · Cited by 16
Hasell, A., Lyons, B. A., Tallapragada, M., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1746377 · Cited by 15
Yates, O. E. T., Manuela, S., Neef, A., & Groot, S. (2022) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-022-01942-y · Cited by 17
Bolsen, T., Palm, R. I., & Luke, R. E. (2023) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-023-03575-4 · Cited by 14
Areia, N. P., Sequeira, M. D., & Tavares, A. O. (2024) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104643 · Cited by 13
Kobayashi, K. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01275-1 · Cited by 12
Policy or scientific messaging? Strategic framing in a case of subnational climate change conflict
Cann, H. W. (2021) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12438 · Cited by 13
A motivational systems approach to investigating opinions on climate change
Molden, D. C., Bayes, R., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2021.1982003 · Cited by 12
How people decide who is correct when groups of scientists disagree
Johnson, B. B., Mayorga, M. W., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2023) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14204 · Cited by 11
Said, N., Frauhammer, L. T., & Huff, M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102128 · Cited by 15
Syropoulos, S., & Sparkman, G. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2419705122 · Cited by 12
Kobayashi, K. (2019) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2019.1650105 · Cited by 11
Climate news articles lack basic climate science
Romps, D. M., & Retzinger, J. P. (2019) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ab37dd · Cited by 12
Golebie, E., van Riper, C. J., Hitzroth, G., Huegelmann, A., & Joffe-Nelson, N. (2023) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-023-03055-x · Cited by 17
Ayalon, L. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298219 · Cited by 12
Lind, A. V., Morton, T. A., & Dalege, J. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102370 · Cited by 11
Explaining Chinese Reactions to COVID-19 During the Outbreak: A Systematic Illustration
Yuan, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.727369 · Cited by 10
Participating in a climate prediction market increases concern about global warming
Cerf, M., Matz, S., & MacIver, M. A. (2023) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01679-4 · Cited by 11
Learning about climate politics during COP 21: Explaining a diminishing knowledge gap
Silva-Schmidt, F. D., Brüggemann, M., Hoppe, I., & Arlt, D. (2022) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625211068635 · Cited by 10
van Stekelenburg, A., Bleize, D. N. M., Riet, J. V. ‘., Schaap, G., Vlasceanu, M., & Doell, K. C. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102480 · Cited by 9
Bergan, D. E., Lapinski, M. K., & Turner, S. (2022) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edac016 · Cited by 9
König, L. M., Altenmüller, M. S., Fick, J., Crusius, J., Genschow, O., & Sauerland, M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/cwbrs · Cited by 9
Disaster experience mitigates the partisan divide on climate change: Evidence from Texas
Chen, T. H. Y., Fariss, C. J., Shin, H., & Xu, X. (2024) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102918 · Cited by 8
Eom, K., & Choy, B. K. C. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104684 · Cited by 8
Do Populists Listen to Expertise? A Five-Country Study of Authority, Arguments, and Expert Sources
Peresman, A., Larsen, L. T., Mazepus, H., & Petersen, M. B. (2025) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00323217251323402 · Cited by 13
Rode, J. B., Remshard, M., Groot, L. J., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101521 · Cited by 9
Using generative AI to increase sceptics’ engagement with climate science
Bagó, B., Müller, P., & Bonnefon, J. (2025) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02424-9 · Cited by 8
Framing market‐based versus regulatory climate policies: A comparative analysis
Young, K., Gurganus, K., & Raymond, L. (2022) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12493 · Cited by 8
Kurt, G., & Akdur, R. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16062269 · Cited by 8
Political Psychology and the Climate Crisis
Geiger, N., Gruszczynski, M., & Swim, J. K. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.037 · Cited by 9
Social Prevalence Is Rationally Integrated in Belief Updating
Orticio, E., Martí, L., & Kidd, C. (2022) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00056 · Cited by 8
How the public, and scientists, perceive advancement of knowledge from conflicting study results
Koehler, D. J., & Pennycook, G. (2019) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005398 · Cited by 8
Rohring, E., & Akerlof, K. (2020) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-020-01652-3 · Cited by 7
Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/15291006221114132 · Cited by 8
A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate changePreprint
Većkalov, B., Geiger, S. J., White, M. P., Rutjens, B. T., van Harreveld, F., Stablum, F., Akın, B., Aldoh, A., Bai, J., Berglund, F., et al. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/bctm3 · Cited by 8
Learning from and about climate scientistsPreprint
Orchinik, R., Dubey, R., Gershman, S. J., Powell, D., & Bhui, R. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ezua5 · Cited by 8
Eom, K., & Choy, B. K. C. (2024) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470241277196 · Cited by 8
Badullovich, N., Kotcher, J., Myers, T. A., Rosenthal, S. A., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2025) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-025-03934-3 · Cited by 7
Self-citationÇetin, A. K., Şen, G., & Aksaray, B. (2024) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-06-2024-0577 · Cited by 7
Public concern about climate change impacts on food choices: The interplay of knowledge and politics
Schuldt, J. P., Eiseman, D. L., & Hoffmann, M. P. (2020) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-020-10019-7 · Cited by 7
Swim, J. K., Geiger, N., & Guerriero, J. G. (2021) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2021.1957710 · Cited by 7
What is wrong with conspiracy beliefs?
Alper, S., & Yılmaz, O. (2023) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17926.1 · Cited by 7
Kim, J., & Fang, S. (2020) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.19020201 · Cited by 9
Scientific consensus communication about contested science: A preregistered meta-analysisPreprint
van Stekelenburg, A., Schaap, G., Veling, H., Riet, J. V. ‘., & Buijzen, M. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/etsrw · Cited by 8
A Systematic Literature Review Protocol on Climate Change Perception Models
Amanat, N., Valinejadi, A., Mehrifar, Y., & Poursadeqiyan, M. (2022) · Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research · doi:10.32598/jaehr.10.3.1254 · Cited by 6
Fu, H., Li, Y., Wu, Z., Tan, Y., He, W., & Zuo, J. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05675-1 · Cited by 7
Generation of change? South African attitudes towards climate change in comparative perspective
Roberts, B. J., Struwig, J., Gordon, S. L., Zondi, T., Hannan, S., & Gastrow, M. (2022) · Development Southern Africa · doi:10.1080/0376835x.2022.2070454 · Cited by 6
Inoculating Adolescents Against Climate Change Misinformation
Schubatzky, T., & Haagen‐Schützenhöfer, C. (2023) · Contributions from science education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32225-9_17 · Cited by 8
FutureCoast: A Playful Way to Assess Public Perceptions for Better Climate Change Communication
Orlove, B., Pfirman, S., Stovall, G., Hernandez, T., Redsecker, K., Eklund, K., & Simon, E. B. (2024) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2024.2341926 · Cited by 8
Who is at risk of bias? Examining dispositional differences in motivated science reception
Altenmüller, M., & Poppe, L. (2024) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625241262611 · Cited by 4
Dynamic model of climate action
Wong‐Parodi, G., Relihan, D. P., & Garfin, D. R. (2024) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad6917 · Cited by 6
Breaking the climate silence: Predictors of discussing global warming with family and friends
Orr, M., Borth, A. C., Kotcher, J., Campbell, E., Myers, T. A., Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S. A., & Clarke, C. E. (2025) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000538 · Cited by 9
Self-citationLogemann, H. T., & Tomczyk, S. (2022) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470221143087 · Cited by 5
Self-reported reasons for (not) being worried about climate change
Gregersen, T., Doran, R., & Storelv, S. (2023) · Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100154 · Cited by 6
Motta, M., & Benegal, S. D. (2023) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625231167735 · Cited by 6
Influencing Climate Change Attitudes in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPreprint
Rode, J. B., Dent, A. L., Benedict, C. N., Brosnahan, D., Martinez, R. L., & Ditto, P. H. (2020) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/bjen5 · Cited by 11
Logemann, H. T., Rode, J. B., Maertens, R., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70022 · Cited by 9
Understanding the role of pluralistic ignorance in biodiversity conservation: A research agenda
Geiger, S. J., Imada, H., Maharja, C., Powdthavee, N., Vitale, V., Zhang, L., Rosa, C. D., Delabrida, Z. N. C., Nielsen, K. S., Essl, F., et al. (2025) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103043 · Cited by 6
Predictors of U.S. public support for climate aid to developing countries
Ansah, P., Campbell, E., Kotcher, J., Rosenthal, S. A., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2023) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ad0ff2 · Cited by 6
Self-citationReporting on Science as an Ongoing Process (or Not)
Slater, M. H., Scholfield, E. R., & Moore, J. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2020.535474 · Cited by 5
Some recommendations for doing high‐impact research in social psychological science
van der Linden, S. (2021) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12463 · Cited by 6
Public Conceptions of Scientific Consensus
Slater, M. H., Huxster, J. K., & Scholfield, E. R. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00569-z · Cited by 9
A Bayesian decision-theoretic framework for studying motivated reasoningPreprint
Priniski, J. H., Solanki, P., & Horne, Z. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ngavz · Cited by 7
Rekker, R. (2024) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2024.1254826 · Cited by 6
Fian, L., Vaupotič, N., Richter, I., Koelmans, A. A., & Pahl, S. (2026) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625251410494 · Cited by 4
Marasco, A., Romano, A., & Sotis, C. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aca6fd · Cited by 4
Framing Covid-19 in the South African News Media: An Analysis of 22 Months of Reporting
Meyer, C., & Schalkwyk, F. V. V. (2023) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2023.2232473 · Cited by 3
The Gateway Belief Model: A pre-registered large-scale replication in China
Zeng, Z., van Prooijen, J., Guo, Y., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102542 · Cited by 4
Do Source cues or frames matter? Convincing the public about the veracity of climate science
Gainous, J., Payne, R. A., & Merry, M. K. (2021) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13033 · Cited by 4
Rosenthal, S., & Ai, P. (2024) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2024.2343108 · Cited by 4
Measuring belief in climate change with a single item
Berger, S., Hauser, D., Lange, A., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · Global Environmental Psychology · doi:10.5964/gep.10895 · Cited by 4
Babnik, K., & Lep, Ž. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66947-7_11 · Cited by 3
Li, Y., Liang, Y., Tian, J., Sun, Y., & Meng, M. (2023) · Climate and Development · doi:10.1080/17565529.2023.2266420 · Cited by 3
The role of consensus messaging in teaching evolution
Korfmacher, I. M., Hammann, M., & Konnemann, C. (2024) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2024.2400724 · Cited by 3
Ji, Z., Gong, Y., Tian, J., Tong, Z., Tian, X., & Sun, Y. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102746 · Cited by 3
Publics and UK parliamentarians underestimate the urgency of peaking global greenhouse gas emissions
Kenny, J., & Geese, L. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02655-w · Cited by 2
Landrum, A. R., Davis, B., Huxster, J. K., & Carrasco, H. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260342 · Cited by 3
What Should We Believe About Belief?
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0001 · Cited by 3
Amadu, I., & Adongo, C. A. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03333-y · Cited by 4
Suspiciously Convenient Belief
Levy, N. L. (2020) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-020-10116-w · Cited by 3
Combining Refutations and Social Norms Increases Belief ChangePreprint
Ecker, U. K. H., Sanderson, J. A., McIlhiney, P., Rowsell, J., Quekett, H., Brown, G. D. A., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/j9w8q · Cited by 3
Said, N., Frauhammer, L. T., & Huff, M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bwksd · Cited by 3
How to change people’s minds about climate change: what the science says
Soliman, A. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-024-02777-9 · Cited by 3
Levy, N. (2021) · Bad Beliefs · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.003.0005 · Cited by 2
Do norm-based appeals affect the acceptance of the singular use of they/them pronouns?
Bolsen, T., & Thornton, J. R. (2024) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/20531680241264078 · Cited by 2
Video communication, blue marble awe, and attitudes toward climate change and renewable energy
Vasi, I. B., & Paez-Arellano, M. M. (2025) · npj Climate Action · doi:10.1038/s44168-024-00203-4 · Cited by 2
Leoniak, K. J., & Korniluk, A. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102796 · Cited by 2
La, E. Y., Wang, J. S., & Schuldt, J. P. (2024) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edae029 · Cited by 2
Levy, N. L. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.013.6 · Cited by 2
Maier, K. J., Whitehead, G. I., & Lahay, A. R. (2022) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12901 · Cited by 2
Framing Poverty in Nigerian Online Media Reports on the Inaugural Neglected Tropical Diseases Day
Omitola, O. M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95100-9_8 · Cited by 2
Why do we argue about science? Exploring the psychological antecedents of rejection of science
Kerr, J. R. (2020) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17142374 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 49-58
- ISSN
- 0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914105364
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 15
- FWCI
- 69.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- climate change attitudes, belief updating, political ideology, conservatives, replication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review