Cited by 267Climate Change Communication and PerceptionRisk Perception and ManagementClimate Change Policy and Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication

Open access

van der Linden, Sander, Leiserowitz, Anthony, Maibach, Edward·2019·Journal of Environmental Psychology

DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 · Cited by 11,335
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
Untitled work
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046408 · Cited by 4,819

Show all 107 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Panagopoulos, 2016, Consensus cues, issue salience and policy preferences: An experimental investigation, North American Journal of Psychology, 18, 405

Sorted by citations

Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z · Cited by 4,964
Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking
Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983 · Cited by 773
When worry about climate change leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions
Bouman, T., Verschoor, M., Albers, C. J., Böhm, G., Fisher, S. D., Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L. E., & Steg, L. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102061 · Cited by 560
Views of health professionals on climate change and health: a multinational survey study
Kotcher, J., Maibach, E. W., Miller, J., Campbell, E., Alqodmani, L., Maiero, M., & Wyns, A. (2021) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00053-x · Cited by 569
Self-citation
Defining Misinformation and Understanding its Bounded Nature: Using Expertise and Evidence for Describing Misinformation
Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1716500 · Cited by 486
Understanding (and Reducing) Inaction on Climate Change
Hornsey, M. J., & Fielding, K. S. (2019) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12058 · Cited by 381
Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It
Lewandowsky, S. (2020) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409 · Cited by 384
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276
Anti-Intellectualism, Populism, and Motivated Resistance to Expert Consensus
Merkley, E. (2019) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfz053 · Cited by 303
Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1906589116 · Cited by 234
Self-citation
Global Warming’s Six Americas: a review and recommendations for climate change communication
Leiserowitz, A., Roser‐Renouf, C., Marlon, J. R., & Maibach, E. W. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.007 · Cited by 280
Self-citation
The Evolving Field of Risk Communication
Balog‐Way, D. H. P., McComas, K. A., & Besley, J. C. (2020) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13615 · Cited by 263
Combatting climate change misinformation: Evidence for longevity of inoculation and consensus messaging effects
Maertens, R., Anseel, F., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101455 · Cited by 185
Evaluating people's awareness about climate changes and environmental issues: A case study
Calculli, C., D’Uggento, A. M., Labarile, A., & Ribecco, N. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129244 · Cited by 211
Science skepticism in times of COVID-19
Rutjens, B. T., van der Linden, S., & van der Lee, R. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220981415 · Cited by 171
Bad Beliefs
Levy, N. L. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.001.0001 · Cited by 173
Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries
Flores, A., Cole, J. C., Dickert, S., Eom, K., Jiga‐Boy, G. M., Kogut, T., Loria, R. N., Mayorga, M. W., Pedersen, E. J., Pereira, B. D. C. S., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2117543119 · Cited by 157
Influencing climate change attitudes in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Rode, J. B., Dent, A. L., Benedict, C. N., Brosnahan, D., Martinez, R. L., & Ditto, P. H. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101623 · Cited by 164
Political Orientation Moderates the Relationship Between Climate Change Beliefs and Worry About Climate Change
Gregersen, T., Doran, R., Böhm, G., Tvinnereim, E. M., & Poortinga, W. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01573 · Cited by 157
Motivated reasoning and climate change
Bayes, R., & Druckman, J. N. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.009 · Cited by 151
How and when higher climate change risk perception promotes less climate change inaction
Wang, C., Geng, L., & Rodríguez-Casallas, J. D. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128952 · Cited by 136
The Gateway Belief Model (GBM): A review and research agenda for communicating the scientific consensus on climate change
van der Linden, S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.005 · Cited by 137
When and How Different Motives Can Drive Motivated Political Reasoning
Bayes, R., Druckman, J. N., Goods, A., & Molden, D. C. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12663 · Cited by 119
The Experience of Consensus: Video as an Effective Medium to Communicate Scientific Agreement on Climate Change
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., Gustafson, A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547019874361 · Cited by 130
Self-citation
A Research Agenda for Climate Change Communication and Public Opinion: The Role of Scientific Consensus Messaging and Beyond
Bayes, R., Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2020) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1805343 · Cited by 126
The Impact of Message Source on the Effectiveness of Communications About Climate Change
Bolsen, T., Palm, R. I., & Kingsland, J. T. (2019) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547019863154 · Cited by 126
Leveraging Social Science to Generate Lasting Engagement with Climate Change Solutions
Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.011 · Cited by 108
Climate Decision-Making
Orlove, B., Shwom, R., Markowitz, E. M., & Cheong, S. (2020) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-085130 · Cited by 101
Framing the Origins of COVID-19
Bolsen, T., Palm, R. I., & Kingsland, J. T. (2020) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547020953603 · Cited by 111
Climate change perception: Driving forces and their interactions
Ruiz, I., Faria, S. H., & Neumann, M. B. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.020 · Cited by 87
Correcting Misperceptions About Genetically Modified Food on Social Media: Examining the Impact of Experts, Social Media Heuristics, and the Gateway Belief Model
Bode, L., Vraga, E. K., & Tully, M. (2020) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547020981375 · Cited by 86
Psychological inoculation strategies to fight climate disinformation across 12 countries
Spampatti, T., Hahnel, U. J. J., Trutnevyte, E., & Brosch, T. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01736-0 · Cited by 104
Using Social and Behavioural Science to Support COVID-19 Pandemic ResponsePreprint
Bavel, J. J. V., D, K. B. A., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A. K., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4178356 · Cited by 89
Motivation and climate change: A review
Brick, C., Bosshard, A., & Whitmarsh, L. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.001 · Cited by 76
The language of conspiracy: A psychological analysis of speech used by conspiracy theorists and their followers on Twitter
Fong, A. A., Roozenbeek, J., Goldwert, D., Rathje, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220987596 · Cited by 82
Scientific-Consensus Communication About Contested Science: A Preregistered Meta-Analysis
van Stekelenburg, A., Schaap, G., Veling, H., Riet, J. V. ‘., & Buijzen, M. (2022) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976221083219 · Cited by 69
Conspiracy beliefs and science rejection
(2022) · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101392 · Cited by 62
Climate change anxiety: A meta-analysis
Kühner, C., Gemmecke, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Zacher, H. (2025) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103015 · Cited by 81
Anger consensus messaging can enhance expectations for collective action and support for climate mitigation
Sabherwal, A. C., Pearson, A. R., & Sparkman, G. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101640 · Cited by 62
Considering attitudinal uncertainty in the climate change skepticism continuum
Haltinner, K., & Sarathchandra, D. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102243 · Cited by 56
Climate Change Risk Perceptions of Audiences in the Climate Change Blogosphere
van Eck, C. W., Mulder, B. C., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12197990 · Cited by 57
Exposure to Scientific Consensus Does Not Cause Psychological Reactance
van der Linden, S., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1617763 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
When fairness is flawed: Effects of false balance reporting and weight-of-evidence statements on beliefs and perceptions of climate change.
Imundo, M. N., & Rapp, D. N. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.10.002 · Cited by 49
Chinese residents’ attitudes toward consumption-side climate policy: The role of climate change perception and environmental topic involvement
Tian, J., Sun, M., Gong, Y., Chen, X., & Sun, Y. (2022) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106294 · Cited by 50
A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change
Većkalov, B., Geiger, S. J., Bartos̆, F., White, M. P., Rutjens, B. T., van Harreveld, F., Stablum, F., Akın, B., Aldoh, A., Bai, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-01928-2 · Cited by 73
Limited effects of exposure to fake news about climate change
Otten, C. D., Siegrist, M., & Árvai, J. (2020) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/abae77 · Cited by 55
Emotional responses to climate change information and their effects on policy support
Myers, T. A., Roser‐Renouf, C., & Maibach, E. W. (2023) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2023.1135450 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Beliefs about others' global warming beliefs: The role of party affiliation and opinion deviance
Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S., Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., Kotcher, J., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101466 · Cited by 41
Self-citation
Behavioural frameworks to understand public perceptions of and risk response to carbon dioxide removal
Shrum, T., Markowitz, E. M., Buck, H. J., Gregory, R., van der Linden, S., Attari, S. Z., & Leaf Van Boven, A. (2020) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2020.0002 · Cited by 53
Open Questions in Scientific Consensus Messaging Research
Landrum, A. R., & Slater, M. H. (2020) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1776746 · Cited by 46
Communicating the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: Diverse Audiences and Effects Over Time
Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., van der Linden, S., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2022) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00139165221129539 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Increasing people's acceptance of anthropogenic climate change with scientific facts: Is mechanistic information more effective for environmentalists?
Taube, O., Ranney, M. A., Henn, L., & Kaiser, F. G. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101549 · Cited by 63
Climate Change Consensus Messages Cause Reactance
Chinn, S., & Hart, P. S. (2021) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1910530 · Cited by 47
Boosting Understanding and Identification of Scientific Consensus Can Help to Correct False Beliefs
van Stekelenburg, A., Schaap, G., Veling, H., & Buijzen, M. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976211007788 · Cited by 44
A preregistered replication of “Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change”
Williams, M. N., & Bond, C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101456 · Cited by 48
Communicating the Scientific Consensus on Human-Caused Climate Change is an Effective and Depolarizing Public Engagement Strategy: Experimental Evidence from a Large National Replication StudyPreprint
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2733956 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Managing Infodemics in the 21st Century
Purnat, T. D., Nguyen, T., & Briand, S. C. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4 · Cited by 54
Scaling up interactive argumentation by providing counterarguments with a chatbot
Altay, S., Schwartz, M., Hacquin, A.-S., Allard, A., Blancke, S., & Mercier, H. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01271-w · Cited by 39
What We Think Others Think and Do About Climate Change: A Multicountry Test of Pluralistic Ignorance and Public-Consensus Messaging
Geiger, S. J., Köhler, J. K., Delabrida, Z. N. C., Realivazquez, K. A. G., Haugestad, C. A. P., Imada, H., Iyer, A., Maharja, C., Mann, D. C., Marczak, M., et al. (2025) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976251335585 · Cited by 37
The effects of communicating scientific uncertainty on trust and decision making in a public health context
Schneider, C. R., Freeman, A. L. J., Spiegelhalter, D. J., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008962 · Cited by 39
Investigating and Improving the Accuracy of US Citizens’ Beliefs About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study
van Stekelenburg, A., Schaap, G., Veling, H., & Buijzen, M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/24069 · Cited by 33
North America
(IPCC), I. P. O. C. C. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009325844.016 · Cited by 59
Recently emerging trends in big data analytic methods for modeling and combating climate change effects
Ikegwu, A. C., Nweke, H. F., Mkpojiogu, E., Anikwe, C. V., Igwe, S. A., & Alo, U. R. (2024) · Energy Informatics · doi:10.1186/s42162-024-00307-5 · Cited by 35
The durable, bipartisan effects of emphasizing the cost savings of renewable energy
Gustafson, A., Goldberg, M. H., Bergquist, P., Lacroix, K., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2022) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-022-01099-2 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Emotional foundations of the public climate change divide
Hahnel, U. J. J., Mumenthaler, C., & Brosch, T. (2019) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02552-0 · Cited by 33
Climate change policy support, intended behaviour change, and their drivers largely unaffected by consensus messages in Germany
Tschötschel, R., Schuck, A. R. T., Schwinges, A., & Wonneberger, A. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101655 · Cited by 33
Information about the human causes of global warming influences causal attribution, concern, and policy support related to global warming
Bergquist, P., Marlon, J., Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., Rosenthal, S., & Leiserowitz, A. (2022) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2022.2030407 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Science through a tribal lens: A group-based account of polarization over scientific facts
Fasce, A., Adrián‐Ventura, J., Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302211050323 · Cited by 32
Fostering climate change consensus: The role of intimacy in group discussions
Swol, L. M. V., Bloomfield, E. F., Chang, C.-T., & Willes, S. (2021) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625211020661 · Cited by 37
Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the climate change worry scale
Innocenti, M., Santarelli, G., Faggi, V., Ciabini, L., Castellini, G., Galassi, F., & Ricca, V. (2022) · The Journal of Climate Change and Health · doi:10.1016/j.joclim.2022.100140 · Cited by 31
Climate change concern as driver of sustainable mobility and reduced car use
Mouratidis, K., & Næss, P. (2024) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104345 · Cited by 31
Do People Actually “Listen to the Experts”? A Cautionary Note on Assuming Expert Credibility and Persuasiveness on Public Health Policy Advocacy
Geiger, N. (2020) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1862449 · Cited by 34
Reasoning about climate change
Bagó, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad100 · Cited by 41
To Debunk or Not to Debunk? Correcting (Mis)Information
Vraga, E. K., Ecker, U. K. H., Žeželj, I. L., Lazić, A., & Azlan, A. A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4_7 · Cited by 30
A goldilocks critique of the hot cognition perspective on climate change skepticism
Hennes, E. P., Kim, T., & Remache, L. J. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.009 · Cited by 28
Effects of Conspiracy Rhetoric on Views About the Consequences of Climate Change and Support for Direct Carbon Capture
Bolsen, T., Palm, R. I., & Kingsland, J. T. (2021) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1991967 · Cited by 27
Anti-Intellectualism, Populism, and Motivated Resistance to Expert ConsensusPreprint
Merkley, E. D. (2019) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/qkd57 · Cited by 32
Communicating expert consensus increases personal support for COVID‐19 mitigation policies
Kerr, J. R., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12827 · Cited by 23
More Evidence of Psychological Reactance to Consensus Messaging: A Response to van der Linden, Maibach, and Leiserowitz (2019)
Dixon, G., Hmielowski, J. D., & Ma, Y. (2019) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1671472 · Cited by 26
An Examination of Expertise, Caring and Salient Value Similarity as Source Factors that Garner Support for Advocated Climate Policies
Geiger, N., Sarge, M. A., & Comfort, R. N. (2022) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2022.2080242 · Cited by 26
Pride and guilt as place-based affective antecedents to pro-environmental behavior
Shipley, N. J., van Riper, C. J., Stewart, W. P., Chu, M. L., Stedman, R. C., & Dolcos, F. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1084741 · Cited by 24
Communications about uncertainty in scientific climate-related findings: a qualitative systematic review
Kause, A., de Bruin, W. B., Domingos, S., Mittal, N., Lowe, J. A., & Fung, F. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abb265 · Cited by 26
Predicting the importance of global warming as a voting issue among registered voters in the United States
Campbell, E., Kotcher, J., Maibach, E. W., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2021) · Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cresp.2021.100008 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Combining refutations and social norms increases belief change
Ecker, U. K. H., Sanderson, J. A., McIlhiney, P., Rowsell, J., Quekett, H., Brown, G. D. A., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218221111750 · Cited by 27
Effects of consensus messages and political ideology on climate change attitudes: inconsistent findings and the effect of a pretest
Chinn, S., & Hart, P. S. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03200-2 · Cited by 22
Using a News Article to Convey Climate Science Consensus Information
Rode, J. B., Iqbal, S., Butler, B. J., & Ditto, P. H. (2021) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470211027235 · Cited by 16
How to Communicate Science to the Public?
König, L. M., Altenmüller, M. S., Fick, J., Crusius, J., Genschow, O., & Sauerland, M. (2024) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000572 · Cited by 33
Behavioural climate policy
van der Linden, S., Pearson, A. R., & Leaf Van Boven, A. (2020) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.44 · Cited by 17
Norm-Based Governance for Severe Collective Action Problems: Lessons from Climate Change and COVID-19
Raymond, L., Kelly, D., & Hennes, E. P. (2021) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592721003054 · Cited by 23
Cognitive complexity increases climate change belief
Chen, L., & Unsworth, K. L. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101316 · Cited by 20
Beliefs about whose beliefs? Second-order beliefs and support for China's coal-to-gas policy
Schuldt, J. P., Yu, Y., Song, Y., & Liu, K. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101367 · Cited by 20
Convenient but biased? The reliability of convenience samples in research about attitudes toward climate changePreprint
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/2h7as · Cited by 21
Self-citation
When experts matter: Variations in consensus messaging for vaccine and genetically modified organism safety
Lyons, B. A., Mérola, V., Reifler, J., Spälti, A. K., Stedtnitz, C., & Stoeckel, F. (2023) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625231188594 · Cited by 19
Truth over identity? Cultural cognition weakly replicates across 23 countries
Pröpper, H. Y. L., Geiger, S. J., Blanken, T. F., & Brick, C. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101865 · Cited by 21
Party over pandemic: Polarized trust in political leaders and experts explains public support for COVID-19 policies
Cole, J. C., Flores, A., Jiga‐Boy, G. M., Klein, O., Sherman, D. K., & Leaf Van Boven, A. (2022) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302221118534 · Cited by 19
Pro-environmental behavior in a common-resource dilemma: The role of beliefs
Wyss, A. M., Berger, S., & Knoch, D. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102160 · Cited by 19
Climate adaptation and climate mitigation do not undermine each other: A cross-cultural test in four countries
Urban, J., Vačkář, D., & Baďura, T. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101658 · Cited by 18
Reasoning about climate changePreprint
Bagó, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vcpkb · Cited by 17
Impact of Constructive Narratives About Climate Change on Learned Helplessness and Motivation to Engage in Climate Action
Said, N., & Wölfl, V. (2025) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00139165251315576 · Cited by 21
From gateways to multilinear connections: A qualitative longitudinal investigation of the relationships between vaping and smoking among adolescent users
Hughes, J., Sykes, G., Hughes, K., O’Reilly, M. J., Goodwin, J. D., Sutton, C. E., & Karim, K. (2021) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103341 · Cited by 17

Authors: van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E.
Affiliations: Yale University (US)
George Mason University (US)
ORCID: Leiserowitz, Anthony
Maibach, Edward
Venue: Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2019-04
Volume: 62
Pages: 49-58
ISSN: 0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009
OpenAlex: W2914105364
Cited by: 262
References: 107
Citations by year: 2026: 18 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 15
FWCI: 69.75
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
www.repository.cam.ac.uk
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
Apollo
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords: climate change attitudes, belief updating, political ideology, conservatives, replication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks