The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In one experiment, Republicans received a message indicating that a clear majority of fellow Republicans agreed that the climate is changing and are taking action to combat climate change. These individuals — relative to those who did not receive this message — were more likely to report believing in climate change and to have climate-friendly intentions323,324.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [323]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the consensus messages in this study decreased ideological polarization by being more effective among conservatives than among liberals.”
From Factual belief polarization between Democrats and Republicans: source or epiphenomenon of ideological and affective polarization? (2024) · cites this paper as Van der Linden et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“another study, however, found that consensus messages effectively increased people's belief in global warming, as well as their support for climate action (Van der Linden et al., 2019).”
From Factual belief polarization between Democrats and Republicans: source or epiphenomenon of ideological and affective polarization? (2024) · cites this paper as Van der Linden et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 · Cited by 11,335
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046408 · Cited by 4,819
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x · Cited by 4,344
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346 · Cited by 4,037
Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x · Cited by 3,885
The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x · Cited by 3,643
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60330-5 · Cited by 3,143
Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology: Current Practices and New Recommendations
Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x · Cited by 2,430
The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Gifford, R. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0023566 · Cited by 2,326
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming
Cook, J., Орескес, Н., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R. L., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., Carlton, J. S., Lewandowsky, S., Skuce, A. G., Green, S., et al. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002 · Cited by 1,637
Self-citationMeta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2943 · Cited by 1,616
Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009 · Cited by 1,469
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4 · Cited by 1,288
Boomerang Effects in Science Communication
Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2011) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650211416646 · Cited by 1,221
The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12394 · Cited by 1,183
Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm.
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243 · Cited by 1,075
Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer).
Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P., & Ha, S. E. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018933 · Cited by 1,063
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017) · Global Challenges · doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008 · Cited by 1,058
Self-citationWhen small effects are impressive
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.160 · Cited by 1,008
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799 · Cited by 971
The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence
Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y · Cited by 904
The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion
Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0 · Cited by 891
Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change
Tankard, M. E., & Paluck, E. L. (2016) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12022 · Cited by 883
Consensus decision making in animals
Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008 · Cited by 872
The Political Divide on Climate Change: Partisan Polarization Widens in the U.S.
Dunlap, R. E., McCright, A. M., & Yarosh, J. H. (2016) · Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995 · Cited by 786
Climate‐Science Communication and the Measurement Problem
Kahan, D. M. (2015) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12244 · Cited by 750
The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence
van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489 · Cited by 661
Self-citationEvidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults' Political Predispositions
Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1999) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2647773 · Cited by 581
The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition
Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12140 · Cited by 580
Self-citationThe Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”?
Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00772.x · Cited by 576
Improving Public Engagement With Climate Change
van der Linden, S., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615598516 · Cited by 546
Self-citationMarx, S. M., Weber, E. U., Orlove, B., Leiserowitz, A., Krantz, D. H., Roncoli, C., & Phillips, J. A. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.10.004 · Cited by 532
Self-citationThe pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1720 · Cited by 527
Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes
Mutz, D. C. (1998) · Cited by 501
Climategate, Public Opinion, and the Loss of Trust
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. W., Roser‐Renouf, C., Smith, N., & Dawson, E. C. (2012) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764212458272 · Cited by 442
Self-citationSupport for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement
Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1295 · Cited by 441
Self-citationMotivated Rejection of Science
Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2016) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721416654436 · Cited by 418
Changing the Perception of the Norm: A Strategy to Decrease Binge Drinking among College Students
Haines, M., & Spear, S. F. (1996) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.1996.9936873 · Cited by 377
Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments
Guess, A., & Coppock, A. (2020) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123418000327 · Cited by 372
Identifying Expertise to Extract the Wisdom of Crowds
Budescu, D. V., & Chen, E. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.1909 · Cited by 371
Chen, S., Shechter, D., & Chaiken, S. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.262 · Cited by 355
The Relative Validity of Inferences About Mediation as a Function of Research Design Characteristics
Stone‐Romero, E. F., & Rosopa, P. J. (2007) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428107300342 · Cited by 349
How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects
Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. K., Bach, D. R., Roepstorff, A., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.055 · Cited by 339
Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA
McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Xiao, C. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0704-9 · Cited by 334
Rational irrationality: modeling climate change belief polarization using Bayesian networks
Cook, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2016) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12186 · Cited by 332
Counteracting the Politicization of Science
Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2015) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12171 · Cited by 318
Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda
Dc, W. (2018) · Cited by 318
The Heuristic-Systematic Model of Social Information Processing
Todorov, A. T., Chaiken, S., & Henderson, M. D. (2002) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412976046.n11 · Cited by 316
Beliefs about Climate Beliefs: The Importance of Second-Order Opinions for Climate Politics
Mildenberger, M., & Tingley, D. H. (2017) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123417000321 · Cited by 316
Mannes, A. E., Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036677 · Cited by 275
Benegal, S., & Scruggs, L. A. (2018) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2192-4 · Cited by 255
Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation
Jost, J. T., van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., & Hardin, C. D. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.003 · Cited by 242
Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2018) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430217737855 · Cited by 228
Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy
Van Boven, L., Ehret, P. J., & Sherman, D. K. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617748966 · Cited by 228
Improving Climate Change Acceptance Among U.S. Conservatives Through Value-Based Message Targeting
Dixon, G., Hmielowski, J., & Ma, Y. (2017) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547017715473 · Cited by 222
How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: plain facts, pie charts or metaphors?
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2014) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1190-4 · Cited by 211
Self-citationLeading Voices in the Denier Choir
Elsasser, S. W., & Dunlap, R. E. (2012) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764212469800 · Cited by 177
The Persuasion handbook: developments in theory and practice
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2509 · Cited by 167
Investigating the effects of knowledge and ideology on climate change beliefs
Guy, S., Kashima, Y., Walker, I. A., & O’Neill, S. J. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2039 · Cited by 166
van der Linden, S., Clarke, C. E., & Maibach, E. W. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4 · Cited by 163
Self-citationThe Effect of Information Provision on Public Consensus about Climate Change
Deryugina, T., & Shurchkov, O. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151469 · Cited by 150
Effects of Evidence on Attitudes: Is Polarization the Norm?
Kuhn, D., & Lao, J. R. (1996) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00340.x · Cited by 149
Can journalistic “false balance” distort public perception of consensus in expert opinion?
Koehler, D. J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000073 · Cited by 149
Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts
Linden, S. V. D., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0259-2 · Cited by 136
Self-citationTesting Equivalence in Communication Research: Theory and Application
Weber, R., & Popova, L. (2012) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.703834 · Cited by 135
Darke, P. R., Chaiken, S., Bohner, G., Einwiller, S. A., Erb, H., & Hazlewood, J. D. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672982411007 · Cited by 121
Political Conservatives’ Affinity for Obedience to Authority Is Loyal, Not Blind
Frimer, J. A., Gaucher, D. M., & Schaefer, N. K. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214538672 · Cited by 117
Perceptions of scientific dissent undermine public support for environmental policy
Aklin, M., & Urpelainen, J. (2014) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.006 · Cited by 111
Myers, T. A., Maibach, E., Peters, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120985 · Cited by 102
Self-citationSocial Psychology and Politics
O'Dwyer, E. J. (2016) · Social Psychological Review · doi:10.53841/bpsspr.2016.18.2.48 · Cited by 99
In consensus we trust? Persuasive effects of scientific consensus communication
Chinn, S., Lane, D. S., & Hart, P. S. (2018) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662518791094 · Cited by 98
Brewer, P. R., & McKnight, J. (2017) · Atlantic Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/15456870.2017.1324453 · Cited by 96
Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety
Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200295 · Cited by 95
Questionnaire Design Effects in Climate Change Surveys
Schuldt, J. P., Roh, S., & Schwarz, N. (2015) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716214555066 · Cited by 88
Experimental effects of climate messages vary geographically
Zhang, B., van der Linden, S., Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J. R., Howe, P. D., & Leiserowitz, A. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0122-0 · Cited by 87
Self-citationDixon, G. (2016) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12260 · Cited by 82
Public Awareness of the Scientific Consensus on Climate
Hamilton, L. C. (2016) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244016676296 · Cited by 82
Using Weight-of-Experts Messaging to Communicate Accurately About Contested Science
Dunwoody, S., & Kohl, P. A. (2017) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547017707765 · Cited by 75
The Impact of Perceived Scientific and Social Consensus on Scientific Beliefs
Kobayashi, K. (2018) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547017748948 · Cited by 73
The intergroup foundations of climate change justice
Swim, J. K., & Bloodhart, B. (2018) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430217745366 · Cited by 62
The role of anchoring in judgments about expert consensus
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12576 · Cited by 49
Self-citationSmall behavioral science–informed changes can produce large policy-relevant effects
Cialdini, R. B., Martin, S., & Goldstein, N. J. (2015) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1353/bsp.2015.0008 · Cited by 37
Climate change and intergroup relations: Psychological insights, synergies, and future prospects
Pearson, A. R., & Schuldt, J. P. (2018) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430217747750 · Cited by 32
Social Origins of Scientific Deviance: Examining Creationism and Global Warming Skepticism
Tom, J. C. (2017) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1177/0731121417710459 · Cited by 27
REFLECTIONS ON BIASED ASSIMILATION AND BELIEF POLARIZATION
Ross, L. D. (2012) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2012.711025 · Cited by 26
The potential power of experience in communications of expert consensus levels
Harris, A. J. L., Sildmäe, O., Speekenbrink, M., & Hahn, U. (2018) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1440416 · Cited by 21
Kobayashi, K. (2018) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12499 · Cited by 20
“Counting votes” in public responses to scientific disputes
Johnson, B. B. (2017) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662517706451 · Cited by 18
Caught in the Crossfire: A Defense of the Cultural Theory of Gun-Risk Perceptions
Kahan, D. M., & Braman, D. (2003) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · doi:10.2307/3312936 · Cited by 17
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.10.002 · Cited by 16
Self-citation“Global Warming” versus “Climate Change” and the Influence of Labeling on Public Perceptions
Schuldt, J. P. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.309 · Cited by 13
Crano, W. (2015) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315717104-11 · Cited by 10
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Panagopoulos, 2016, Consensus cues, issue salience and policy preferences: An experimental investigation, North American Journal of Psychology, 18, 405
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z · Cited by 4,964
Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking
Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983 · Cited by 773
Bouman, T., Verschoor, M., Albers, C. J., Böhm, G., Fisher, S. D., Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L. E., & Steg, L. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102061 · Cited by 560
Views of health professionals on climate change and health: a multinational survey study
Kotcher, J., Maibach, E. W., Miller, J., Campbell, E., Alqodmani, L., Maiero, M., & Wyns, A. (2021) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00053-x · Cited by 569
Self-citationVraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1716500 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 49-58
- ISSN
- 0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914105364
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 15
- FWCI
- 69.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- climate change attitudes, belief updating, political ideology, conservatives, replication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
