Cited by 43Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyExercise and Physiological Responses

Effects of sprint distance and repetition number on energy system contributions in soccer players

Open access
Ulupınar, Süleyman, Özbay, Serhat, Gençoğlu, Cebrail, Franchini, Emerson, Kishalı, Necip Fazıl, İnce, İzzet·2021·Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the effect of sprint distance and repetition number on performance, physiological responses, and energy systems contributions. METHODS: and lactate values, the energy system contributions were calculated using a mono-exponential model and mathematical calculations. Energy systems contributions and total energy expenditure (TEE) were calculated both for the entire protocol (overall) and for the sprints only. RESULTS: ) systems contributions were higher in the 10 × 40. CONCLUSIONS: Although HR and RPE responses were higher in the 20 × 20, phosphagen (during sprints) and glycolytic (during both sprints and overall protocol) were higher in the 10 × 40 protocol. Therefore, the 10 × 40 protocol seems more reasonable for developing or evaluating the anaerobic systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesf.2021.03.003

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RSA protocols maximize anaerobic power by breaking down high-energy phosphates and enhancing glycolytic enzyme activity while also activating the oxidative system during recovery periods.

    “RSA protocols maximize anaerobic power by breaking down high-energy phosphates and enhancing glycolytic enzyme activity while also activating the oxidative system during recovery periods7,12,13.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ulupınar, S., Özbay, S., Gençoğlu, C., Franchini, E., Kishalı, N. F., & İnce, İ.
Affiliations
  • Mi̇lli̇ Eği̇ti̇m Bakanliği (TR)
  • Erzurum Technical University (TR)
  • Atatürk University (TR)
  • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University (TR)
Corresponding author
Gençoğlu, Cebrail
Venue
Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
182-188
ISSN
1728-869X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3151679144
Cited by
43
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
sprint distance, energy system contribution, soccer players, anaerobic energy system, phosphagen system, glycolytic system, total energy expenditure, blood lactate, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review