Cited by 124Social and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Evidence for the regulatory function of intergroup emotion: emotional consequences of implemented or impeded intergroup action tendencies.

Maitner, Angela T., Mackie, Diane M., Smith, Eliot R.·2006·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.08.001

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maitner, A. T., Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
Maitner, Angela T.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
720-728
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151434496
Cited by
124
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
intergroup emotions, emotion regulation, intergroup behavior, retaliation, anger, guilt, fear, intergroup aggression, reparations, intergroup conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review