Cited by 61Social and Intergroup PsychologyNostalgia and Consumer BehaviorHong Kong and Taiwan Politics

Collective nostalgia is associated with stronger outgroup-directed anger and participation in ingroup-favoring collective action

Open access
Cheung, Wing-Yee, Sedikides, Constantine, Wildschut, Tim, Tausch, Nicole, Ayanian, Arin H.·2017·Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Abstract

Collective nostalgia refers to longing for the way society used to be. We tested whether collective nostalgia is associated with ingroup-favoring collective action and whether this association is mediated by outgroup-directed anger and outgroup-directed contempt. We conducted an online study of Hong Kong residents (N = 111) during a large-scale democratic social movement, the Umbrella Movement, that took place in Hong Kong in 2014 in response to proposed electoral reforms by the Chinese government in Mainland China. Reported collective nostalgia for Hong Kong’s past was high in our sample and collective nostalgia predicted stronger involvement in ingroup-favoring collective action, and it did so indirectly via higher intensity of outgroup-directed anger (but not through outgroup-directed contempt). We argue that collective nostalgia has implications for strengthening ingroup-serving collective action, and we highlight the importance of arousal of group-based emotions in this process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5964/jspp.v5i2.697

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nostalgia promotes prosocial attitudes and behaviors, such as cooperation, charitable donations, and prejudice reduction.

    “Third, nostalgia promotes prosocial attitudes and behaviors, such as cooperation30,50, charitable donations51,52, and prejudice reduction53–56, all of which can be perceived as sociomoral concerns linked to moral values57.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheung, W.-Y., Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Tausch, N., & Ayanian, A. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Winchester (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
Venue
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Published
2017-08-02
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
301-319
ISSN
2195-3325 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2739596945
Cited by
61
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
11.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Social and Political Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Winchester Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PsychOpen Gold (Leibniz Institute for Psychology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Psychology Archives (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Keywords
collective nostalgia, in-group favoritism, collective action, group-based emotions, Umbrella Movement, Hong Kong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review