The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bias blind spot has been theorized to be a result of the three possible sources: introspection illusion, naïve realism, and self-enhancement motives (Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
From Agency and self-other asymmetries in perceived bias and shortcomings: Replications of the Bias Blind Spot and link to free will beliefs (2021) · cites this paper as Pronin & Kugler, 2007
In the citing paper
“Bias blind spots have been attributed to two complementary mechanisms (Pronin, 2007, 2008; Pronin et al., 2004): (a) people’s belief that they objectively perceive reality (i.e., naïve realism; Griffin & Ross, 1991; Ross & Ward, 1996) and (b) self-other asymmetries in the value1 given to introspective evidence (Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
From Everyone I Don’t Like Is Biased: Affective Evaluations and the Bias Blind Spot (2026) · cites this paper as Pronin, 2007
In the citing paper
“Self-other asymmetries regarding the value given to introspective evidence support the perception of an objective self in a world of biased others.”
From Everyone I Don’t Like Is Biased: Affective Evaluations and the Bias Blind Spot (2026) · cites this paper as Pronin & Kugler, 2007
In the citing paper
“But people actually lack access to their own associative machinery 18,19 , and rely on heuristics to understand the decision-making of other people 20 .”
From Understanding, explaining, and utilizing medical artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 3×
“People often fail to recognize that while they do have access to their mental contents, they do not have access to the mental processes that underlie those contents and therefore to whether those processes involve bias (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977a).”
BackgroundHuman Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
JONES, E. E. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,760
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.
Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025589 · Cited by 3,083 · cited 1×
“These included the eVects of nonconscious cues on bystander intervention ( Darley & Latane, 1968; Darley, Teger, & Lewis, 1973), interpersonal rudeness (Bargh, Chen, & Burrows, 1996), achievement at a verbal task (Bargh, Gollwitzer, Lee-Chai, Barndollar, & Troetschel, 2001), cooperation vs. competition in a prisoner’s…”
BackgroundMiller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230 · Cited by 2,736
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Connolly, T., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1981) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392481 · Cited by 2,690
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The preregistration revolution
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1708274114 · Cited by 1,998
Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions.
Lai, C. K., Marini, M., Lehr, S. A., Cerruti, C., Shin, J.-E. L., Joy-Gaba, J. A., Ho, A. K., Teachman, B. A., Wojcik, S. P., Koleva, S. P., et al. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0036260 · Cited by 719
“Intervention 9: The phenomenon known as the " bias blind spot " (Pronin & Kugler, 2007) reflects people's beliefs that they are objective and impartial and are immune to biased judgments.”
The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections
Epstein, R., & Robertson, R. E. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1419828112 · Cited by 640
“Invisible sources of influence can be harder to defend against (67–69), and for people who are impressionable, invisible sources of influence not only persuade, they also leave people feeling that they made up their own minds— that no external force was applied (70, 71).”
BackgroundPerception and misperception of bias in human judgment
Pronin, E. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.001 · Cited by 433
Self-citationDoing Unto Future Selves As You Would Do Unto Others: Psychological Distance and Decision Making
Pronin, E., Olivola, C. Y., & Kennedy, K. A. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207310023 · Cited by 380
Self-citationCognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot.
West, R. F., Meserve, R. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028857 · Cited by 380
“It is likewise with self-assessment based on introspective information, rather than behavioral information (Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
BackgroundHow we see ourselves and how we see others
Pronin, E. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154199 · Cited by 353
Self-citationUnderstanding, explaining, and utilizing medical artificial intelligence
Cadario, R., Longoni, C., & Morewedge, C. K. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01146-0 · Cited by 342
Grossmann, I. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616672066 · Cited by 306
“Research on the topic of bias blindspot suggests that the self–other asymmetry in social perception is partially driven by attaching greater credibility to one’s ability to gain insights when reflecting on the self (cf. introspection illusion; Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
BackgroundVazire, S., & Mehl, M. R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013314 · Cited by 458
“For example, although the self has privileged access to mental states (e.g., thoughts, feelings, intentions), recent research suggests that this may in fact impair the accuracy of self-perceptions, for example by leading people to construct false reasons for their behavior (Bargh & Chartrand, 1999; Bargh & Williams, 2…”
Individual Differences in Self-Enhancement and Self-Protection Strategies: An Integrative Analysis
Hepper, E. G., Gramzow, R. H., & Sedikides, C. (2010) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00633.x · Cited by 285
Overcoming the Barriers to Self-Knowledge
Carlson, E. N. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612462584 · Cited by 268
“People tend to place a great deal of trust in their introspections, but generating explanations for one’s tendencies seems to make self-perceptions less accurate (Pronin, 2009; Pronin & Kugler, 2007; Silvia & Gendolla, 2001; Wilson, 2002; Wilson & Dunn, 2004; Wilson & LaFleur, 1995).”
BackgroundRudman, L. A., Moss‐Racusin, C. A., Glick, P., & Phelan, J. E. (2012) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394286-9.00004-4 · Cited by 251
Weathers, D., Swain, S. D., & Grover, V. (2015) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.07.009 · Cited by 192
Can 1st-Year College Students Accurately Report Their Learning and Development?
Bowman, N. A. (2009) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831209353595 · Cited by 187
“In general, people are confident about all kinds of self-knowledge, such as identifying factors that influence their decision making and knowledge of certain traits and characteristics, but they are often incorrect (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Pronin & Kugler, 2007; Wilson, 2002).”
BackgroundA benefit–cost perspective of the consumer adoption of the mobile banking system
Shen, Y., Huang, C., Chu, C., & Hsu, C.-T. (2010) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290903490658 · Cited by 184
“Prior literature has shown that introspecting one’s own behaviour can have interesting effects on one’s thinking and subsequent actual behaviour (Pronin and Kugler 2007).”
Background“I think it, therefore it’s true”: Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination
Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2007) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.07.001 · Cited by 232
“Taken together, this research suggests that self-perceptions of objectivity increase people’s faith in the validity of their beliefs and thoughts, and perhaps even in the validity of their feelings and intuitions (cf. Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
BackgroundThe Preregistration RevolutionPreprint
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2017) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/2dxu5 · Cited by 220
Bargh, J. A. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189636.003.0007 · Cited by 163
Wang, Y. (2020) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100872 · Cited by 215
A Task-Based Taxonomy of Cognitive Biases for Information Visualization
Dimara, E., Franconeri, S., Catherine Plaisant, B., Bezerianos, A., & Dragicevic, P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2872577 · Cited by 192
Nonrational processes in ethical decision making.
Rogerson, M. D., Gottlieb, M. C., Handelsman, M. M., Knapp, S. J., & Younggren, J. N. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0025215 · Cited by 140
“Rational models of cognition often fail to capture the reality of human choice and behavior (Kah-neman, 2003; Kahneman & Klein, 2009), and people fail to acknowledge their own biases due to a tendency to overvalue introspective information in themselves but not in others (Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
Epley, N., & Waytz, A. G. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001014 · Cited by 148
Bias Blind Spot: Structure, Measurement, and Consequences
Scopelliti, I., Morewedge, C. K., McCormick, E., Min, H. L., Lebrecht, S., & Kassam, K. S. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2096 · Cited by 183
“The bias blind spot has been attributed to the interplay of two phenomena: the introspection illusion and naïve realism (Pronin et al. 2004, Pronin and Kugler 2007).”
BackgroundChapter 1 The Introspection Illusion
Pronin, E. (2009) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00401-2 · Cited by 139
Self-citationRacial prejudice predicts opposition to Obama and his health care reform plan
Knowles, E. D., Lowery, B. S., & Schaumberg, R. L. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.011 · Cited by 123
“Social psychologists have long known that people have difficulty discerning the causes of their own behavior (e.g., Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Pronin & Kugler, 2007) and, moreover, tend to avoid reporting attitudes frowned upon by society (e.g., Block, 1965; Goldstein, 1960; Marlow & Crowne, 1961).”
BackgroundPronin, E., Berger, J. A., & Molouki, S. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.585 · Cited by 131
Self-citationBallantyne, N. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190847289.001.0001 · Cited by 122
Neal, T. M. S., & Brodsky, S. L. (2016) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000077 · Cited by 114
Luksyte, A., Unsworth, K. L., & Avery, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2219 · Cited by 133
“For instance, exposing employees to information about noteworthy female innovators and, thus, eliminating their “blind spot” on this issue, may help attenuate the male-innovator association (Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: a critical review
Schloss, J. P., & Murray, M. J. (2011) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2011.558707 · Cited by 115
“@The existence of deeply seated cognitive biases that cannot be eliminated or ought not be globally corrected is an important and plausible adjunct hypothesis to this account of SP, and indeed there are good reasons to think that just such pre-existing tendencies do exist. For example, our amply demonstrated tendencie…”
BackgroundInfluentialNeal, T. M. S., Lienert, P., Denne, E., & Singh, J. P. (2022) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000482 · Cited by 113
People believe they have more free will than others
Pronin, E., & Kugler, M. B. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1012046108 · Cited by 100
“The present results and this view of the actor–observer bias are consistent with research on the introspection illusion (18, 34, 35), which entails people’s tendency to view their own motives, intentions, and desires as the key to understanding their actions (a tendency not shown in the case of others).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationMaybe holier, but definitely less evil, than you: Bounded self-righteousness in social judgment.
Klein, N., & Epley, N. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000050 · Cited by 102
Emotional and electrophysiological measures correlate to flavour perception in the presence of music
Kantono, K., Hamid, N., Shepherd, D., Lin, Y. H. T., Skiredj, S., & Carr, B. T. (2018) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.11.012 · Cited by 99
Do you know more when it matters less?
Feltz, A., & Zarpentine, C. (2010) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2010.514572 · Cited by 98
“Importantly, a wide body of research indicates that people view themselves as less susceptible than others to a host of cognitive and motivational biases, a phenomenon known as the bias blind spot (Pronin, 2006, 2008; Pronin, Gilovich, & Ross, 2004; Pronin & Kugler, 2006).”
BackgroundExperiencing the Unexpected: Toward a Model of College Diversity Experiences and Attitude Change
Bowman, N. A., & Brandenberger, J. W. (2012) · Review of higher education/The review of higher education · doi:10.1353/rhe.2012.0016 · Cited by 91
“…into their cognition than they actually do; that is, people confidently report what influenced their decisions, how their attitudes have changed, or what they have learned, but these “introspections” are often incorrect (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Pronin & Kugler, 2007; Ross, 1989; Wilson, 2002).”
BackgroundThe Price of Financial Precarity: Organizational Costs of Employees’ Financial Concerns
Meuris, J., & Leana, C. R. (2018) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1187 · Cited by 88
The incremental validity of average state self-reports over global self-reports of personality.
Finnigan, K. M., & Vazire, S. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000136 · Cited by 96
“The accuracy of self-reports of behavior—even in-the-moment self-reports—is an empirical question with mixed empirical evidence (Gosling, John, Craik, & Robins, 1998; Pronin & Kugler, 2007; Schwarz, 2012).”
BackgroundPeople Claim Objectivity After Knowingly Using Biased Strategies
Hansen, K., Gerbasi, M. E., Todorov, A. T., Kruse, E. T., & Pronin, E. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214523476 · Cited by 83
“…test has demonstrated that individuals’ evaluations of this test are self-servingly biased such that individuals who believe that they have performed poorly evaluate the test more negatively than individuals who believe they have performed well (Pronin & Kugler, 2007; Pronin et al., 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSelf‐reports, peer ratings and construct validity
Paunonen, S. V., & O’Neill, T. (2010) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.751 · Cited by 83
“Other putative advantages of such informant reports include minimizing certain memory errors or biases in self-reports (Pronin & Kugler, 2007), and incorporating a vantage point external to that of the self (Kolar et al., 1996).”
BackgroundThe Divide Between Diversity Training and Diversity Education: Integrating Best Practices
King, E. B., Gulick, L. M. V., & Avery, D. R. (2009) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562909348767 · Cited by 82
“Research in social psychology (e.g., Pronin & Kugler, 2007) suggests that attitude change may require an awareness and understanding of the cognitive structures and biases which underlie our beliefs, thus supporting the need for educators and trainers to attend to awareness and knowledge.”
BackgroundConcepts and implications of altruism bias and pathological altruism
Oakley, B. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1302547110 · Cited by 91
“However, surprisingly, an individual can be oblivious to the consequences of these interwoven effects as a consequence of “bias blind spot” (43).”
BackgroundHelzer, E. G., & Dunning, D. A. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028124 · Cited by 75
Perceived partner responsiveness promotes intellectual humility
Reis, H. T., Lee, K. Y., O'Keefe, S. D., & Clark, M. S. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.006 · Cited by 70
‘Mum, can I play on the internet?’
Cornish, L. S. (2014) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2501/ija-33-3-437-473 · Cited by 71
Mentalizing during social InterAction: A four component model
Wu, H., Liu, X., Hagan, C. C., & Mobbs, D. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.031 · Cited by 71
Implicit bias, awareness and imperfect cognitions
Holroyd, J. (2014) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.024 · Cited by 79
“…measures so valuable.31 Moreover, recent studies indicate that such a motivation has a role in sustaining our view of ourselves as immune to bias: Pronin and Kugler (2007) found individuals to over-rely on on misleading introspective evidence of propensity to bias (introspection revealing –…”
BackgroundBeyond the Business Case: An Ethical Perspective of Diversity Training
Jones, K. P., King, E. B., Nelson, J. K., Geller, D. S., & Bowes‐Sperry, L. (2013) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21517 · Cited by 65
“Finally, advanced organizers could be used to help trainees realize their own biases, thereby reducing bias blind spots (Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
BackgroundCan College Students Accurately Assess What Affects Their Learning and Development?
Bowman, N., & Seifert, T. A. (2011) · Journal of college student development · doi:10.1353/csd.2011.0042 · Cited by 67
“Psychologists have long questioned people’s ability to make accurate judgments about themselves (e.g., Gilbert, 2007; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Pronin & Kugler, 2007; Wilson, 2002); that is, people generally think they know what will make them happy, why they decided on a certain course of action,…”
BackgroundThe topography of generosity: Asymmetric evaluations of prosocial actions.
Klein, N., & Nicholas Epley, A. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000025 · Cited by 63
Innovation and cause-related marketing success: a conceptual framework and propositions
Christofi, M., Leonidou, E., Vrontis, D., Kitchen, P. J., & Papasolomou, I. (2015) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-04-2014-0114 · Cited by 65
The SPOT Effect: People Spontaneously Prefer their Own Theories
Gregg, A. P., Mahadevan, N., & Sedikides, C. (2016) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1099162 · Cited by 62
False polarization: debiasing as applied social epistemology
Kenyon, T. (2014) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0438-x · Cited by 61
Debunking Biased Thinkers (Including Ourselves)
Ballantyne, N. (2015) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2014.17 · Cited by 61
“But in self-judgment about bias, we overlook our actions and instead cling to how things feel on the inside (Pronin and Kugler 2007).”
BackgroundCritical Thinking Education and Debiasing (AILACT Essay Prize Winner 2013)
Beaulac, G., & Kenyon, T. (2014) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v34i4.4203 · Cited by 67
In Search of Our True Selves: Feedback as a Path to Self-Knowledge
Bollich, K. L., Johannet, P. M., & Vazire, S. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00312 · Cited by 61
“More generally, introspection may work when people pay attention to subtle cues (Wilson, 2003; Hofmann and Wilson, 2010), or are educated about the common pitfalls and biases associated with introspection (Pronin and Kugler, 2007).”
BackgroundContext Effects and Observer Bias—Implications for Forensic Odontology
Page, M., Taylor, J. A., & Blenkin, M. (2011) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01903.x · Cited by 58
“Indeed, the ignorance of contextual effects is a recognized psychological phenomenon in itself and has been termed the ‘‘bias blind spot’’ (3).”
BackgroundBallantyne, N. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0008 · Cited by 59
Can Novices Trust Themselves to Choose Trustworthy Experts? Reasons for (Reserved) Optimism
Brennan, J. (2020) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2019.1703056 · Cited by 59
“This dimension of cognitive biases is explained by a phenomenon called the bias blind spot, extensively researched by Emily Pronin (2007; Pronin and Kugler 2007; Pronin, Lin, and Ross 2002; Pronin, Gilovich, and Ross 2004) and helpfully summarized by Nathan Ballantyne (2015).”
The power and limits of personal change: When a bad past does (and does not) inspire in the present.
Klein, N., & O’Brien, E. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000088 · Cited by 55
“Via an essay task, observers were given more direct access to others’ internal states by reading about their first-hand, full experience in either changing or staying the same (see Pronin & Kugler, 2007, Study 3, for a conceptually similar method).”
BackgroundMethodKelly, T. A. F. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192842954.001.0001 · Cited by 65
When cognition turns vicious: Heuristics and biases in light of virtue epistemology
Samuelson, P. L., & Church, I. M. (2015) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2014.904197 · Cited by 52
“We over-rely on our introspections, considering the more objective, behavioral facts as secondary (Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodReflective practice in clinical psychology: Reflections from basic psychological science.
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Basterfield, C. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/cpsp.12352 · Cited by 77
“Failing to detect it, they conclude that they are largely or entirely unbiased (Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
BackgroundNasie, M., Bar-Tal, D., Pliskin, R., Nahhas, E., & Halperin, E. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214551153 · Cited by 56
“…thoughts, attitudes, and behaviors led them to be less affected by these specific biases in their judgments and decision-making (see, for example, Pronin & Kugler, 2007; Rand, 2003; Schul, 1993).1 Hence, we hypothesized that raising awareness to naïve realism and addressing its implications and…”
BackgroundVIII—What Do We Want from a Model of Implicit Cognition?
Holroyd, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1093/arisoc/aow005 · Cited by 48
Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning
Simon, D., & Read, S. J. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231204579 · Cited by 47
“Given this perceived access to objective truth, people tend to believe that others will share the same impression and that divergent perceptions stem from being uninformed, unreasonable, or biased (Pronin et al., 2004; Pronin & Kugler, 2007; L. Ross & Ward, 1996).”
Assessing learning and development among diverse college students
Bowman, N. A. (2010) · New Directions for Institutional Research · doi:10.1002/ir.322 · Cited by 43
“In general, people are confident about all kinds of self-knowledge, such as knowledge of their own traits and characteristics and their ability to identify factors that influenced their decision making, but their views are often erroneous (Nisbett and Wilson, 1977; Pronin and Kugler, 2007; Wilson, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluencing choice without awareness
Olson, J. A., Amlani, A. A., Raz, A., & Rensink, R. A. (2015) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.004 · Cited by 43
“It might also help with related effects, such as the introspective illusion, in which people overestimate the accuracy of their thoughts (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
BackgroundThe illusion of argument justification.
Fisher, M., & Keil, F. C. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0032234 · Cited by 42
Klein, N., & Nicholas Epley, A. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217711918 · Cited by 40
The forensic disclosure model: What should be disclosed to, and by, forensic experts?
Almazrouei, M. A., Dror, I. E., & Morgan, R. M. (2019) · International journal of law, crime and justice · doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.05.003 · Cited by 44
Ethical decision-making models: a taxonomy of models and review of issues
Johnson, M. K., Weeks, S. N., Peacock, G. G., & Rodríguez, M. M. D. (2021) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2021.1913593 · Cited by 39
Mitigating bias blind spot via a serious video game
Bessarabova, E., Piercy, C. W., King, S., Vincent, C. S., Dunbar, N. E., Burgoon, J. K., Miller, C. H., Jensen, M. L., Elkins, A. C., Wilson, D. W., et al. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.089 · Cited by 39
“BBS stems from the unconscious tendency to value one's knowledge, experiences, and introspections over the knowledge, experiences, and introspections of others (Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
InfluentialLegal psychologists as experts: guidelines for minimizing bias
Vredeveldt, A., van Rosmalen, E. A. J., Koppen, P. J. V., Dror, I. E., & Otgaar, H. (2022) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2022.2114476 · Cited by 51
“A possible explanation may be that people believe that they have insight into their own mental state, but consider other people ’ s introspections to be untrustworthy (Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
When evaluators get it wrong: False positive IDs and parental alienation.
Warshak, R. A. (2019) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000216 · Cited by 41
“Research on biases leaves no doubt that cognitive biases operate automatically, outside of awareness, and they cannot be avoided simply through introspection and conscious effort (Pronin & Kugler, 2007; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
BackgroundModeling strategic management for cause‐related marketing
Tsai, S. (2009) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/02634500910977872 · Cited by 38
Examining systematic errors in predictors of college student self‐reported gains
Bowman, N. A. (2011) · New Directions for Institutional Research · doi:10.1002/ir.386 · Cited by 34
Complex Social Consequences of Self-Knowledge
Tenney, E. R., & Spellman, B. A. (2010) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550610390965 · Cited by 36
“…consistent with research suggesting that people generally believe what other people say (Gilbert, 1991; Zuckerman, Koestner, & Alton, 1984) but also that people assume that their own insight into their own knowledge and abilities is better (Pronin & Kugler, 2007; Spellman, Tenney, & Scalia, 2010).”
BackgroundDouble Standards in the Use of Enhancing Products by Self and Others
Williams, E. F., & Steffel, M. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/676750 · Cited by 34
The objectivity illusion and voter polarization in the 2016 presidential election
Schwalbe, M. C., Cohen, G. L., & Ross, L. D. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1912301117 · Cited by 54
How is Information Valued? Evidence from Framed Field Experiments
Hoffman, M. (2016) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12401 · Cited by 32
“…the degree of other people’s overconfidence).24 This result is consistent with a large literature in psychology on the ‘blind spot bias’, where subjects believe behavioural biases to be stronger in others than in themselves (Ehrlinger et al., 2005; Pronin and Kugler, 2007; Pronin et al., 2007).”
ResultValue revelations: Disclosure is in the eye of the beholder.
Pronin, E., Fleming, J. J., & Steffel, M. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012710 · Cited by 32
“More recent work has demonstrated that people not only have more access to their own thoughts, feelings, desires, and intentions but also place more weight on that sort of information when making self-judgments (Kruger & Gilovich, 2004; Pronin, Berger, & Molouki, 2007; Pronin & Kugler, 2007 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationHumans’ Bias Blind Spot and Its Societal Significance
Pronin, E., & Hazel, L. (2023) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214231178745 · Cited by 33
“This inappropriate reliance on information gained by looking inward constitutes an introspection illusion (e.g., Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
Self-citationAnything You Can Do, I Can Do Better: Bias Awareness in Forensic Evaluators
Zappala, M., Reed, A. L., Beltrani, A., Zapf, P. A., & Otto, R. K. (2017) · Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/24732850.2017.1413532 · Cited by 34
“…on the bias blind spot in community and student samples, this sample of forensic mental health professionals demonstrated a propensity to rate themselves as less biased than their peers and colleagues (Frantz, 2006; Pronin & Kugler, 2007; Pronin et al., 2002; West, Meserve, & Stanovich, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe unexpected social consequences of diverting attention to our phones
Barrick, E. M., Barasch, A., & Tamir, D. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104344 · Cited by 31
Conceptions of the Self and Others Across Time
Williams, E. F., & Gilovich, T. D. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208317603 · Cited by 30
Williams, E. F., Gilovich, T. D., & Dunning, D. A. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211421937 · Cited by 29
“…know their own desires and intentions, they know their goals and aspirations (Andersen & Ross, 1984; Johnson, 2009; Pronin, Berger, & Molouki, 2007; Pronin & Kugler, 2007), and they are aware of situational constraints and random events that might have prevented them from realizing their potential…”
BackgroundDunbar, N. E., Wilson, S. N., Adame, B. J., Elizondo, J., Jensen, M. L., Miller, C. H., Kauffman, A. A., Seltsam, T., Bessarabova, E., Vincent, C. S., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Game-Based Learning · doi:10.4018/ijgbl.2013100102 · Cited by 26
Tomlin, K. A., Metzger, M. L., & Bradley‐Geist, J. C. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04294-6 · Cited by 30
Koch, C., Dreimüller, N., Weißkircher, J., Deis, N., Gaitzsch, E., Wagner, S., Stoll, M., Bäßler, F., Lieb, K., & Jünger, J. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05420-w · Cited by 28
Toward an understanding of collective intellectual humility
Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., Pärnamets, P., Bland, S., Astola, M., Cichocka, A. K., de Ridder, J., Mercier, H., Meyer, M., O’Connor, C., Porter, T., et al. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.006 · Cited by 27
“Furthermore, we tend to recognize biases and motivated reasoning more readily in others than we do in ourselves [23,48 – 50].”
Walden, T. A., Lesner, T. A., & Jones, R. M. (2019) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105965 · Cited by 24
“Bias turns out to be relatively easy to recognize in others but more difficult to detect in one’s own judgments (Pronin & Kugler, 2007; Pronin, Lin, & Ross, 2002).”
BackgroundWang, Q., & Jeon, H. J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240232 · Cited by 24
“Third, in previous studies of perceptions of bias in self versus others, participants were typically asked to estimate the degree to which the judgments of others or their own might be influenced by bias, or to make explicit self-to-other comparisons on susceptibility to bias [22, 23].”
BackgroundResultSelf-enhancement and theory-based correction processes
McCaslin, M. J., Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.002 · Cited by 24
“Most typically, making people aware of the truth by enhancing their cognitive skills (Kruger & Dunning, 1999) and helping them identify factors that can lead to bias (Pronin & Kugler, 2007) have been shown to diminish these errors.”
BackgroundCui, N., Xu, L., Wang, T., Qualls, W. J., & Hu, Y. (2016) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022116670513 · Cited by 24
“…the culture mixing is judged based on factual observation instead of motivational inference, the self–other asymmetry will be reduced because judgment based on the explicit facts is less involved in the introspection information related to one’s or others’ internal states (Pronin & Kugler, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodForensic clinicians’ understanding of bias.
MacLean, N., Neal, T. M. S., Morgan, R. D., & Murrie, D. C. (2019) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000212 · Cited by 24
Thompson, W. C., & Scurich, N. (2019) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.14031 · Cited by 23
Age-Based Hiring Discrimination as a Function of Equity Norms and Self-Perceived Objectivity
Lindner, N. M., Graser, A., & Nosek, B. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084752 · Cited by 23
“For example, reading a supposed Science article describing the breadth of psychological research on how nonconscious processes influence judgments eliminated the bias blind spot – individuals’ tendency to perceive themselves to be much less susceptible than other people to various cognitive biases [21].”
BackgroundThe Scope of Debiasing in the Classroom
Beaulac, G., & Kenyon, T. (2016) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-016-9398-8 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Pronin, E., & Kugler, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pronin, Emily
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 565-578
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124744634
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 18.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- bias blind spot, behavioral data, unconscious processes, metacognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review