Cited by 70Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The evaluation-behavior link: Direct and beyond valence

Alexopoulos, Theodore, Ric, François·2007·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.017

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexopoulos, T., & Ric, F.
Affiliations
Université Paris Descartes (FR)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
1010-1016
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008372374
Cited by
69
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
approach-avoidance behavior, implicit perception, emotional stimuli, emotional words, valence, unconscious awareness, vigilance task

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review