The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple cues in social perception: The time course of processing race and facial expression
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine the time course of race and expression processing to determine how these cues influence early perceptual as well as explicit categorization judgments. Despite their importance in social perception, little research has examined how social category information and emotional expression are processed over time. Moreover, although models of face processing suggest that the two cues should be processed independently, this has rarely been directly examined. Event-related brain potentials were recorded as participants made race and emotion categorization judgments of Black and White men posing either happy, angry, or neutral expressions. Our findings support that processing of race and emotion cues occur independently and in parallel, relatively early in processing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Importantly, N2 amplitudes are also sensitive to social and emotional manipulations, revealing for example an “own-race effect” with more negative N2 amplitudes for in-group compared with outgroup faces (Ito & Bartholow, 2009;Ito & Urland, 2003, 2005;Kubota & Ito, 2007;Tanaka, Kiefer, & Bukach, 2004).”
From Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study (2021) · cites this paper as Kubota & Ito, 2007
In the citing paper
“In addition, more negative N2 amplitudes were reported for happy compared with angry facial expressions (Kubota & Ito, 2007).”
From Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study (2021) · cites this paper as Kubota & Ito, 2007
Citations
Cites
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,946
The distributed human neural system for face perception
Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0 · Cited by 4,891
Understanding face recognition
Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · Cited by 4,067
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975) · Cited by 3,569
A dual process model of impression formation.
Brewer, M. B. (1988) · Cited by 1,499
Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?
Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.681 · Cited by 1,469
Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect.
Hansen, C., & Hansen, R. D. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.917 · Cited by 1,324
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A. L., & Collins, D. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1488 · Cited by 385
Rossion, B., & Caharel, S. (2011) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.003 · Cited by 349
“…in social neuroscience have reported modulations by socially relevant categories of faces either on the P1 or its negative counterpart on central sites (e.g., sex-typical vs. atypical faces, Freeman, Ambady, & Holcomb, 2010; black vs. white faces, Ito & Urland, 2003, 2005; Kubota & Ito, 2007).”
Ito, T. A., & Bartholow, B. D. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.10.002 · Cited by 246
Self-citationThe unique contributions of perceiver and target characteristics in person perception.
Hehman, E., Sutherland, C. A. M., Flake, J. K., & Slepian, M. L. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000090 · Cited by 226
Feng, S., & Han, S. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.028 · Cited by 219
“…frontal negativity around 120 ms increased to black than to white faces in Caucasians and a following positivity around 170 ms showed larger amplitude to black than to white faces and to emotional (angry and happy) than to neutral expressions (Ito and Urland, 2003, 2005; Kubota and Ito, 2007).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Kubota, J. T., & Ito, T. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kubota, Jennifer T.
- ORCID
- Kubota, Jennifer T.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 738-752
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2031842
- OpenAlex
- W2141177590
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Ford Foundation
- University of Colorado Boulder
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH071257)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- facial expression processing, emotion classification, social perception, time course of processing, parallel computing, early perceptual processing, event-related potentials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review