The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple cues in social perception: The time course of processing race and facial expression
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine the time course of race and expression processing to determine how these cues influence early perceptual as well as explicit categorization judgments. Despite their importance in social perception, little research has examined how social category information and emotional expression are processed over time. Moreover, although models of face processing suggest that the two cues should be processed independently, this has rarely been directly examined. Event-related brain potentials were recorded as participants made race and emotion categorization judgments of Black and White men posing either happy, angry, or neutral expressions. Our findings support that processing of race and emotion cues occur independently and in parallel, relatively early in processing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Importantly, N2 amplitudes are also sensitive to social and emotional manipulations, revealing for example an “own-race effect” with more negative N2 amplitudes for in-group compared with outgroup faces (Ito & Bartholow, 2009;Ito & Urland, 2003, 2005;Kubota & Ito, 2007;Tanaka, Kiefer, & Bukach, 2004).”
From Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study (2021) · cites this paper as Kubota & Ito, 2007
In the citing paper
“In addition, more negative N2 amplitudes were reported for happy compared with angry facial expressions (Kubota & Ito, 2007).”
From Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study (2021) · cites this paper as Kubota & Ito, 2007
Citations
Cites
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,946
The distributed human neural system for face perception
Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0 · Cited by 4,891
Understanding face recognition
Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · Cited by 4,067
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975) · Cited by 3,569
A dual process model of impression formation.
Brewer, M. B. (1988) · Cited by 1,499
Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?
Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.681 · Cited by 1,469
Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect.
Hansen, C., & Hansen, R. D. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.917 · Cited by 1,324
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A. L., & Collins, D. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1488 · Cited by 385
Rossion, B., & Caharel, S. (2011) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.003 · Cited by 349
“…in social neuroscience have reported modulations by socially relevant categories of faces either on the P1 or its negative counterpart on central sites (e.g., sex-typical vs. atypical faces, Freeman, Ambady, & Holcomb, 2010; black vs. white faces, Ito & Urland, 2003, 2005; Kubota & Ito, 2007).”
Ito, T. A., & Bartholow, B. D. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.10.002 · Cited by 246
Self-citationThe unique contributions of perceiver and target characteristics in person perception.
Hehman, E., Sutherland, C. A. M., Flake, J. K., & Slepian, M. L. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000090 · Cited by 226
Feng, S., & Han, S. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.028 · Cited by 219
“…frontal negativity around 120 ms increased to black than to white faces in Caucasians and a following positivity around 170 ms showed larger amplitude to black than to white faces and to emotional (angry and happy) than to neutral expressions (Ito and Urland, 2003, 2005; Kubota and Ito, 2007).”
InfluentialScherf, K. S., Behrmann, M., & Dahl, R. E. (2011) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.07.016 · Cited by 176
“Faces have been used to evaluate the neurobiology of emotion (for review see Phillips et al., 2003a,b), emotion expression processing (e.g., Blair et al., 1999; Phillips et al., 1998, 2001), social cognitive reasoning (Pinkham et al., 2008), and the social perception of race (Kubota and Ito, 2007).”
Intergroup Perception and Cognition
Kawakami, K., Amodio, D. M., & Hugenberg, K. (2017) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.001 · Cited by 186
“Similar effects for race and sex have been observed with other paradigms as well (Amodio, 2010; Ito & Urland, 2005; Kubota & Ito, 2007; see Amodio, Bartholow, & Ito, 2014, for a review).”
BackgroundAmodio, D. M., Bartholow, B. D., & Ito, T. A. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst177 · Cited by 160
Self-citationHow Social Status Shapes Person Perception and Evaluation: A Social Neuroscience Perspective
Mattan, B. D., Kubota, J. T., & Cloutier, J. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616677828 · Cited by 164
“…Crites, Gardner, & Berntson, 1994) where enhanced amplitudes occur in response to negatively evaluated conspecifics (Bartholow, Fabiani, Gratton, & Bettencourt, 2001; Ito & Cacioppo, 2000; Kubota & Ito, 2007) or stimuli with greater motivational salience (Nieuwenhuis, Aston-Jones, & Cohen, 2005).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Social Neuroscience of Prejudice
Amodio, D. M., & Cikara, M. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050928 · Cited by 151
“Although the participants’ task was to classify faces by either their gender or their race, ERPs revealed that regardless of the task, neural activity at approximately 120 ms indicated stronger early neural responses to Black than White faces (see also Kubota & Ito 2007).”
BackgroundOxytocin modulates the racial Bias in neural responses to others' suffering
Sheng, F., Liu, Y., Zhou, B., Zhou, W., & Han, S. (2013) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.11.018 · Cited by 139
Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition
Sui, J., Liu, C. H., & Han, S. (2009) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910802674825 · Cited by 130
“For example, faces with neutral and happy expressions elicited larger N2 amplitudes compared with angry faces (Kubota & Ito, 2007 ).”
BackgroundRacial Bias in Neural Empathic Responses to Pain
Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Baker, K. S., Reynolds, K. J., Batalha, L., & Cunnington, R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084001 · Cited by 116
“Previous ERP studies have shown that racial information is extracted and encoded from faces at a very early stage of facial processing, as early as 120 ms in the N100 component of the ERP, before the analysis of more complex social categories [58–60].”
BackgroundThe Neural Signature of the Own-Race Bias: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials
Wiese, H., Kaufmann, J. M., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs369 · Cited by 115
“…the positive counterpart of the N170, the vertex positive potential (Jeffreys 1989; Joyce and Rossion 2005) or P200 as it is sometimes called, has been described to be larger for other-when compared with own-race faces (Ito and Urland 2003, 2005; Kubota and Ito 2007; Ito and Bartholow 2009).”
Wiese, H. (2011) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.002 · Cited by 111
Jiang, X., Gossack-Keenan, K. L., & Pell, M. D. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021819865833 · Cited by 81
The neural correlates of memory encoding and recognition for own-race and other-race faces
Herzmann, G., Willenbockel, V., Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.019 · Cited by 77
Stereotypes and stereotyping: What's the brain got to do with it?
Susanne Quadflieg, A., & Macrae, C. N. (2011) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2011.627998 · Cited by 85
“This difference has been argued to reflect a bias in attention toward faces containing ingroup cues (Ito & Urland, 2003 ), and concomitant increases in the depth of encoding processes (Kubota & Ito, 2007 ).”
BackgroundStepanova, E. V., & Strube, M. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.019 · Cited by 72
Hurtado, E., Andrés Haye, M., González, R., Manes, F. F., & Ibáñez, A. M. (2009) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-69 · Cited by 69
“Kubota and Ito [86] recorded ERPs while participants made racial and emotional categorization judgments of Black and White men posing with happy, angry, or neutral expressions.”
A Foot in Both Worlds: Asian Americans' Perceptions of Asian, White, and Racially Ambiguous Faces
Willadsen-Jensen, E. C., & Ito, T. A. (2008) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207088037 · Cited by 67
Self-citationRace, emotion and trust: An ERP study
Tortosa, M. I., Lupiáñez, J., & Ruz, M. (2012) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.11.037 · Cited by 72
“Similarly, another ERP deflection that occurs during the same temporal window as the N170, the anterior facesensitive vertex positive potential (VPP), has been described as sensitive to facial stimuli (Jeffreys, 1989).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNeural dynamics of racial categorization predicts racial bias in face recognition and altruism
Zhou, Y., Gao, T., Zhang, T., Li, W., Wu, T., Han, X., & Han, S. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0743-y · Cited by 69
Understanding the self: a cultural neuroscience approach
Han, S., & Northoff, G. (2009) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(09)17814-7 · Cited by 96
“The N2 is also involved in differentiation between different facial expressions (Kubota and Ito, 2007) and between faces of different races (Ito and Urland, 2003), suggesting that the N2 is associated with deeper processing of faces to benefit individuating.”
BackgroundLucas, H. D., Chiao, J. Y., & Paller, K. A. (2011) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00020 · Cited by 61
ERP time course and brain areas of spontaneous and intentional goal inferences
Cruyssen, L. V. D., Duynslaeger, M. V., Cortoos, A., & Overwalle, F. V. (2008) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910802253836 · Cited by 58
“…fearful or happy human faces or armed persons in comparison to neutral faces or unarmed persons, leading to a P200 (Carretié, Mercado, Tapia, & Hinojosa, 2001; Correll, Urland, & Ito, 2006; Eimer & Holmes, 2002; Eimer, Holmes, & McGlone, 2003; Kubota & Ito, 2007) or a P300 (Keil et al., 2002).”
InfluentialMoral concerns increase attention and response monitoring during IAT performance: ERP evidence
van Nunspeet, F., Ellemers, N., Derks, B., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2012) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss118 · Cited by 55
“…the N1 a negative deflection occurring 100 ms after a stimulus is presented is often larger when viewing stimuli resembling outgroup compared to ingroup members [i.e. black vs white faces (Ito and Urland, 2003; Kubota and Ito, 2007); however, see Ito and Urland, 2005 for the reversed pattern].”
BackgroundBernard, P., Gervais, S. J., & Klein, O. (2018) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2018.1471949 · Cited by 53
“Indeed, research has shown that automatic processes can be identified at early stages of neural activity (e.g., Kubota & Ito, 2007) whereas more controlled processes that require executive functions are more likely to occur at later stages of person perception (e.g., Hasting & Kotz, 2008).”
BackgroundDickter, C. L., & Bartholow, B. D. (2010) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00963.x · Cited by 52
“2005; Kubota & Ito, 2007; Willadsen-Jensen & Ito, 2006, 2008).”
Brebner, J. L., Krigolson, O. E., Handy, T. C., Susanne Quadflieg, A., & Turk, D. J. (2011) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.02.090 · Cited by 51
“Previous studies have observed increases in the P200 amplitude to CR compared to OR faces (Dickter & Bartholow, 2007; Kubota & Ito, 2007), however in the current study we found no significant color or structure modulation in this component.”
BackgroundInfluentialLevine, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197570494.001.0001 · Cited by 51
The role of expression and race in weapons identification.
Kubota, J. T., & Ito, T. A. (2014) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0038214 · Cited by 52
“…emotional expression moderates a variety of findings in the intergroup literature, including racial categorization (Hugenberg & Bodenhausen, 2003; Kubota & Ito, 2007), evaluations (Chiu, Ambady, & Deldin, 2004; Dasgupta, DeSteno, Williams, & Hunsinger, 2009; Weisbuch & Ambady, 2008), facial…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationGonzález‐Roldán, A. M., Martínez-Jauand, M., Muñoz, M. Á., Sitges, C., Cifré, I., & Montoya, P. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.037 · Cited by 48
“The presence of an early brain response to anger faces seems also to be in accordance with previous findings suggesting that P200 might reflect the existence of a fast and early detection mechanism for threatening stimuli such as fear or anger [5,11,17,31].”
ResultIntergroup relationships do not reduce racial bias in empathic neural responses to pain
Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Hielscher, E., Sherwell, C. S., Rens, N., & Cunnington, R. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.045 · Cited by 48
“, 2012), and thereby elicits effects later in ERPs compared with racial features alone (Kubota and Ito, 2007; Tortosa et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialChildren use targets’ facial appearance to guide and predict social behavior.
Charlesworth, T. E. S., Hudson, S. T. J., Cogsdill, E. J., Spelke, E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2019) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000734 · Cited by 52
Acupressure as a Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Legget, K. T., Healy, K. M., Dettmann, M. L., Kaye, J. T., Ito, T. A., & Hernández, T. D. (2010) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1515 · Cited by 46
“Each trial was visually inspected for remaining ocular or other artifact; any trials in which artifact was detected were deleted from further analyses (Kubota and Ito, 2007).”
Self-citationElectrophysiological correlates of processing faces of younger and older individuals
Ebner, N. C., He, Y., Fichtenholtz, H. M., McCarthy, G., & Johnson, M. K. (2010) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsq074 · Cited by 45
“, 2008) and those of the race of face (He et al., 2009; Kubota and Ito, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Effects of Face Inversion and Face Race on the P100 ERP
Colombatto, C., & McCarthy, G. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01079 · Cited by 44
Positivity bias in judging ingroup members’ emotional expressions.
Lazerus, T., Ingbretsen, Z. A., Stolier, R. M., Freeman, J. B., & Cikara, M. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000227 · Cited by 43
“…em in at ed br oa dl y. Emotion © 2016 American Psychological Association 2016, Vol. 16, No. 6, 000 1528-3542/16/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000227 1 race targets’ happy, angry, and neutral expressions faster than those of other-race targets (Elfenbein & Ambady, 2003; Kubota & Ito, 2007).”
InfluentialBernard, P., Hanoteau, F., Gervais, S. J., Servais, L., Bertolone, I., Deltenre, P., & Colin, C. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218775690 · Cited by 41
“…of visual processing to examine whether configural processing of bodies is a more automatic phenomenon occurring at early stages of visual processing or whether it only occurs at later stages of person perception, implicating more controlled processing (Hasting & Kotz, 2008; Kubota & Ito, 2007).”
BackgroundCraig, B. M., Mallan, K. M., & Lipp, O. V. (2012) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0028622 · Cited by 42
Dissociated Neural Representations of Pain Expressions of Different Races
Feng, S., Han, X., & Han, S. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu314 · Cited by 44
Racial bias in empathy: Do we process dark- and fair-colored hands in pain differently? An EEG study
Fabi, S., & Leuthold, H. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.024 · Cited by 42
“Within an analysis window of 200ms before stimulus presentation until 1200ms after stimulus onset, ERPs were averaged separately for each experimental condition using the corrected, average-reference EEG data set.”
InfluentialThe processing of invariant and variant face cues in the Garner Paradigm.
Karnadewi, F., & Lipp, O. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0021333 · Cited by 44
Culture but not gender modulates amygdala activation during explicit emotion recognition
Derntl, B., Habel, U., Robinson, S., Windischberger, C., Kryspin‐Exner, I., Gur, R. C., & Moser, E. (2012) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-54 · Cited by 43
Seeing is not stereotyping: the functional independence of categorization and stereotype activation
Ito, T. A., & Tomelleri, S. (2017) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsx009 · Cited by 40
“In past research with non-Black, largely White participants, P200s are consistently larger to Black than White faces whereas N200s are larger to White than Black faces (Dickter and Bartholow, 2007; Ito and Urland, 2003, 2005; Kubota and Ito, 2007; Willadsen-Jensen and Ito, 2006, 2008).”
InfluentialSelf-citationOverwalle, F. V., den Eede, S. V., Baetens, K., & Vandekerckhove, M. M. P. (2009) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsp003 · Cited by 37
The Neural Correlates of Cognitive Objectification
Bernard, P., Rizzo, T., Hoonhorst, I., Deliens, G., Gervais, S. J., Eberlen, J. C., Bayard, C., Deltenre, P., Colin, C., & Klein, O. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617714582 · Cited by 37
“Automatic processes tend to be associated with early stage electrocortical activity (e.g., Kubota & Ito, 2007), such as the N170, whereas processes requiring executive functions tend to occur at later stages of processing (e.g., Hasting & Kotz, 2008; Rellecke Palazova, Sommer, & Schacht, 2011).”
BackgroundEmotion Processing by ERP Combined with Development and Plasticity
Ding, R., Li, P., Wang, W., & Luo, W. (2017) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2017/5282670 · Cited by 39
Trait Mindfulness Predicts Efficient Top‐Down Attention to and Discrimination of Facial Expressions
Quaglia, J. T., Goodman, R. J., & Brown, K. W. (2015) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12167 · Cited by 39
Social identity modifies face perception: an ERP study of social categorization
Derks, B., Stedehouder, J., & Ito, T. A. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsu107 · Cited by 35
Self-citationThe effect of context on responses to racially ambiguous faces: changes in perception and evaluation
Willadsen-Jensen, E. C., & Ito, T. A. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsu134 · Cited by 34
“Because the components of interest have been largest at frontal (Fz), central (Cz) and parietal (Pz) midline scalp sites in past research (Ito and Urland, 2003, 2005; Willadsen-Jensen and Ito, 2006; Kubota and Ito, 2007) analyses focused on these scalp sites.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationHenry, E. A., Bartholow, B. D., & Arndt, J. (2009) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsp041 · Cited by 33
“The analysis also showed a significant main effect of Expression, F(1, 28)¼ 5.38, P 0.05, indicating that the P2 was larger for angry faces (M¼ 6.44 mV) than for happy faces (M¼ 5.44 mV), consistent with previous research (Kubota and Ito, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialStereotyping: Processes and content.
Fiske, S. T., & Tablante, C. B. (2014) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/14341-015 · Cited by 32
Foucart, A., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107902 · Cited by 30
Quinn, P. C., Lee, K., Pascalis, O., & Xiao, N. G. (2019) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000858 · Cited by 31
“Our findings are inconsistent with the view that the processing of facial identity and category information (i.e., race) is independent of that of emotional expression (e.g., Bruce & Young, 1986; Kubota & Ito, 2007).”
ResultRapid race perception despite individuation and accuracy goals
Kubota, J. T., & Ito, T. A. (2016) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2016.1182585 · Cited by 30
“…difference observed in other P200 and N200 race research where no accuracy or individuation instructions were given (see Ito & Urland, 2003, 2005; Kubota & Ito, 2007), it may be the case that the race difference observed after accuracy and individuation instructions would be diminished in…”
InfluentialSelf-citationUs versus them: Understanding the process of race perception with event-related brain potentials
Ito, T. A., & Senholzi, K. B. (2013) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.821430 · Cited by 30
“This was shown by relating the magnitude of ERP race modulations to the speed of racial categorization judgements (Kubota & Ito, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationZhao, M., & Hayward, W. G. (2013) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/13.1.15 · Cited by 28
Zhou, G., Cheng, Z., Yue, Z., Tredoux, C. G., Hu, J., & Wang, L. E. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127709 · Cited by 25
“Black targets evoked larger early selective attention related components (N1 and P2 waves) than did White targets, while White targets evoked larger N2 waves compared with Black targets [12–14].”
Categorising intersectional targets: An “either/and” approach to race- and gender-emotion congruity
Smith, J. S., LaFrance, M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2015) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2015.1081875 · Cited by 28
“2011; Kubota & Ito, 2007) and that the difference in response times to happy and neutral Black faces did not reach significance, this effect should be interpreted with caution.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMultiple group membership influences face-recognition: Recall and neurological evidence
Hehman, E., Stanley, E. M., Gaertner, S. L., & Simons, R. F. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.014 · Cited by 23
“Previous work has demonstrated the primacy and salience of racial categorization over other possible categorizations (Ito & Urland, 2003; Kubota & Ito, 2007; Willadsen-Jenson & Ito, 2006) and the difficulty in decreasing its salience (Shriver et al., 2008), andwe hypothesized that race was a more…”
BackgroundInfluentialChildren’s recognition of emotion expressed by own-race versus other-race faces
Segal, S. C., Reyes, B. N., Gobin, K. C., & Moulson, M. C. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.009 · Cited by 23
The social psychological roots of violent intergroup conflict
Saguy, T., & Reifen‐Tagar, M. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00083-7 · Cited by 21
Social status level and dimension interactively influence person evaluations indexed by P300s
Gyurovski, I., Kubota, J. T., Cardenas‐Iniguez, C., & Cloutier, J. (2017) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2017.1326400 · Cited by 26
“In addition, negative emotional expressions can elicit greater P300s even though individuals encounter those expressions less in their daily life (see Kubota & Ito, 2007, 2014 for a discussion).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationThe Relationship Between Social Power and Sexual Objectification: Behavioral and ERP Data
Xiao, L., Li, B., Zheng, L., & Wang, F. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00057 · Cited by 22
“In addition, as early-stage electrical activity, the N170 can be considered to be an indicator of automatic processes (Kubota and Ito, 2007).”
BackgroundVolpert‐Esmond, H. I., & Bartholow, B. D. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103839 · Cited by 22
Group Style Differences Between Virtual and F2F Teams
Branson, L., Clausen, T. S., & Sung, C. (2008) · American Journal of Business · doi:10.1108/19355181200800005 · Cited by 21
The iterative nature of person construal: Evidence from event-related potentials
Volpert‐Esmond, H. I., Merkle, E. C., & Bartholow, B. D. (2017) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsx048 · Cited by 20
“This occurs regardless of task relevance (Ito and Urland, 2003, 2005; Kubota and Ito, 2007; He et al., 2009) or context (Correll et al.”
BackgroundCraig, B. M., & Lee, A. J. (2020) · Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40750-020-00141-5
A Functional Coupling of Brain and Behavior During Social Categorization of Faces
Volpert‐Esmond, H. I., & Bartholow, B. D. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220976688 · Cited by 21
“Consistent with previous work (Dickter & Bartholow, 2007; Kubota & Ito, 2007), no between-person effect of P2 amplitude on RT was observed.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialvan Nunspeet, F., Derks, B., Ellemers, N., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2014) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614548076 · Cited by 20
“…100–200 ms after stimulus onset, that typically are larger when viewing in-group versus out-group faces (e.g., Amodio, 2010; Ito & Urland, 2003; Kubota & Ito, 2007). van Nunspeet et al. (2014) argued that perceptual attention to the group membership of the IAT targets was enhanced to enable…”
BackgroundCraig, B. M., Lipp, O. V., & Mallan, K. M. (2014) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0037270 · Cited by 20
“…race and emotion. i.e. whether race and emotion interact symmetrically or asymmetrically, or are processed independently (Karnadewi & Lipp, 2011 Kubota & Ito, 2007; Lipp et al., in press), and the majority of studies investigating the interaction of race and emotion (Craig et al., 2012;…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCraig, B. M., & Lipp, O. V. (2017) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2017.1310087 · Cited by 20
“For example, studies assessing the processing of race and emotion have found evidence for independent processing in speeded categorisation tasks and ERPs (Kubota & Ito, 2007), whereas asymmetrical interactions have been observed in one direction in the Garner paradigm (Karnadewi & Lipp, 2011) and in the other directio…”
BackgroundAttention and Working Memory Biases to Black and Asian Faces During Intergroup Contexts
Gonzalez, G. D. S., & Schnyer, D. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02743 · Cited by 16
Non-phase-locked alpha oscillations are involved in spontaneous racial categorization of faces
Zhang, T., & Han, S. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107968 · Cited by 15
Implicit evaluations of faces depend on emotional expression and group membership
Paulus, A., & Wentura, D. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.004 · Cited by 15
Yankouskaya, A., Humphreys, G. W., & Rotshtein, P. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00920 · Cited by 14
Interference among the Processing of Facial Emotion, Face Race, and Face Gender
Li, Y., & Tse, C. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01700 · Cited by 14
“In three experiments with faces of three races as stimuli, the current study aimed at filling this gap in the literature.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialNeural timing of the other‐race effect across the lifespan: A review
Serafini, L., & Pesciarelli, F. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14203 · Cited by 15
Craig, B. M., Koch, S., & Lipp, O. V. (2016) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1215293 · Cited by 15
“…of multiple facial cues has been found to differ across task types, with different interactions observed in categorisation tasks (e.g. Hugenberg, 2005; Kubota & Ito, 2007), affective priming tasks (Craig, Lipp, & Mallan, 2014), and visual search tasks (Lipp, Craig, Frost, Terry, & Smith, 2014).”
BackgroundElectrophysiological correlates of unconscious processes of race
Pesciarelli, F., Leo, I., & Serafini, L. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91133-2 · Cited by 13
Bartholow, B. D. (2010) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.6.723 · Cited by 13
“In addition, the N2 recently has been associated with enhanced processing of ingroup relative to outgroup targets (e.g., Dickter & Bartholow, 2007, in press; Ito & Urland, 2003, 2005; Kubota & Ito, 2007; Willadsen-Jensen & Ito, 2008).”
Influence of empathic concern on fairness-related decision making: Evidence from ERP
He, Y., Hu, X., & Mai, X. (2022) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2022.00385 · Cited by 12
“00 08 4v 2 17 议者可能更倾向于追求自利和竞争, 所以优势不公平分配超出了被试预期, 对被试而言是新 异刺激, 会增强视觉注意, 诱发更负的 AN1(Kubota & Ito, 2007)。根据这一解释, 有共情情境 下他人提出的劣势不公平分配应比无共情情境诱发更负的 AN1, 在数值上存在这样的一个 趋势, 但是在统计上并未达到显著。 共情也调节了表征动机性意义的 P2 成分: 就优势不公平条件而言, 除公平程度之外, 无共情情境下被试仅关注自身利益, 而有共情情境下被试既关注自身利益也关心他人的利 益, 且该条件中自我和他人分配的不均等违背了个体的利他动机和追求公平的动机,…”
Nicolás, G., & Skinner, A. L. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-101107-2.00025-7 · Cited by 12
“Over the course of the 20th century, researchers tackled V. DEVELOPMENT OF CATEGORIES many questions related to racial categorization, from the role of specific facial features (Goodman, 1952) to the influence of the observer’s racial identity (Lent, 1970).”
BackgroundMermillod, M., Grynberg, D., Pio‐Lopez, L., Rychlowska, M., Beffara, B., Harquel, S., Vermeulen, N., Niedenthal, P. M., Dutheil, F., & Droit‐Volet, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00231 · Cited by 14
“For instance, facial emotions expressed by cultural in-group (compared to out-group) targets modulate facial mimicry of participants (Mondillon et al., 2007) and event-related potentials in response to these EFE (Kubota and Ito, 2007).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSocial Neuroscience and Public Policy on Intergroup Relations: A Hegelian Analysis
Kang, S. K., Inzlicht, M., & Derks, B. (2010) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01664.x · Cited by 15
“…measure implicit processes (e.g., racial and gender categorization, implicit evaluations, control processes) that occur very early in information processing (Correll, Urland, & Ito, 2006; Ito, Thompson, & Cacioppo, 2004; Ito & Urland, 2003, 2005; Kubota & Ito, 2007; Willadsen-Jensen & Ito, 2006).”
Otten, M., & Banaji, M. R. (2012) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00009 · Cited by 12
“…that racial and emotional cues are processed independently (Bruce and Young, 1986; Haxby et al., 2000), at least in early neural processing stages (Kubota and Ito, 2007), the current results indicate that neural representation of a face not only integrates variable and invariable cues such as…”
InfluentialThe Social Neuroscience of PrejudicePreprint
Amodio, D. M., & Cikara, M. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2sdzb · Cited by 16
Facial expressions can inhibit the activation of gender stereotypes
Zhang, X.-B., Li, Q., Sun, S., & Zuo, B. (2019) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2019.1586648 · Cited by 9
“Associations between facial expressions and social categorization In real life, we often extract social category information (including stereotypes) from faces (Kubota & Ito, 2007), and perceive social categories and facial expressions simultaneously.”
BackgroundAssessing the speed and spontaneity of racial bias in pain perception
Mende‐Siedlecki, P., Goharzad, A., Tuerxuntuoheti, A., Reyes, P. G. M., Lin, J., & Drain, A. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104315 · Cited by 15
Stimulus set size modulates the sex–emotion interaction in face categorization
Lipp, O. V., Karnadewi, F., Craig, B. M., & Cronin, S. L. (2015) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0849-x · Cited by 11
“…up on studies of the effects of poser race on expression categorization which either reported happy face advantages for same race faces and angry face advantages for other race faces (Hugenberg, 2005), or happy face advantages for both racial ingroup and outgroup faces (Kubota & Ito, 2007).”
BackgroundRace Guides Attention in Visual Search
Otten, M. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149158 · Cited by 11
The Role of Racial Markers in Race Perception and Racial Categorization
MacLin, O. H., & MacLin, M. K. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333176.003.0020 · Cited by 11
A taxonomy for human social perception: Data-driven modeling with cinematic stimuli.
Santavirta, S., Malén, T., Erdemli, A., & Nummenmaa, L. (2024) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000415 · Cited by 11
Wang, X., & Han, S. (2021) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsab027 · Cited by 9
“These results are consistent with previous EEG findings (Williams et al., 2006; Kubota and Ito, 2007; Luo et al., 2010; Sheng and Han, 2012; Calvo et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2020) and suggest similar time courses of early neural activities in”
ResultAsymmetric neurocognitive representation of ethnic in-group/out-group faces
Ma, Y., Ge, J., Xu, X., Fan, Y., Yang, S., & Han, S. (2009) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1007/s11434-009-0357-2 · Cited by 9
Dynamic Neural Processing of Linguistic Cues Related to Death
Liu, X., Shi, Z., Ma, Y., Qin, J., & Han, S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067905 · Cited by 9
Stepanova, E. V., Strube, M., & Yablonsky, G. S. (2013) · International Perspectives in Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032339 · Cited by 9
EEG evidence for racial ingroup bias in collective empathy for pain
Mei, S., Weiss, M. H., Hein, G., & Han, S. (2024) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae019 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Kubota, J. T., & Ito, T. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kubota, Jennifer T.
- ORCID
- Kubota, Jennifer T.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 738-752
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2031842
- OpenAlex
- W2141177590
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Ford Foundation
- University of Colorado Boulder
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH071257)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- facial expression processing, emotion classification, social perception, time course of processing, parallel computing, early perceptual processing, event-related potentials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review