The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual differences in the rejection-aggression link in the hot sauce paradigm: the case of Rejection Sensitivity
Open accessAbstract
Prior research shows that social rejection elicits aggression. In this study, we investigated whether this is moderated by individual differences in Rejection Sensitivity (RS) - a processing disposition to anxiously expect, readily perceive and overreact to rejection. Participants (N = 129) took part in a purported web-based social interaction in which they were either rejected or not by a potential partner. Subsequently, they were given the opportunity to allocate hot sauce to the perpetrator, knowing that he/she disliked spicy food. Amount of hot sauce was used as a behavioral index of aggression. Participants in the rejection condition allocated more hot sauce to the perpetrator than those in the control condition. However, RS moderated this effect such that rejection elicited aggression in high but not in low RS people. These results held after controlling for trait neuroticism. Implications of these findings for understanding how and why rejection elicits aggression are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One particularly powerful and distressing form of social interaction is exclusion or rejection by peers (Williams, 2007), which can negatively affect individual and interpersonal behavior through decreased self-regulation (Baumeister et al., 2005), aggression (Ayduk et al., 2008), and self-defeating actions (Twenge et al., 2002).”
From Risk-taking and social exclusion in adolescence: neural mechanisms underlying peer influences on decision-making (2013) · cites this paper as Ayduk et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
(1999) · Cited by 7,995
Handbook of self-regulation: research, theory, and applications
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-3719 · Cited by 3,646
The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory
Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(00)80003-9 · Cited by 2,521
Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis
Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518 · Cited by 2,519
Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet
Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748 · Cited by 2,276
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890 · Cited by 2,273
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.890 · Cited by 2,267
Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.219 · Cited by 2,113
Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships
Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327 · Cited by 2,110 · cited 17×
“The possible scores range from 0 to 36. The measure is internally reliable ( Downey & Feldman, 1996 ) and shows good predictive utility (see Pietrzak, Downey, & Ayduk, 2005, for review).5”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Williams, K. D. (2009) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00406-1 · Cited by 1,428
Construct validity of the need to belong scale: mapping the nomological network
Leary, M. R., Kelly, K. M., Cottrell, C. A., & Schreindorfer, L. S. (2013) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.819511 · Cited by 855
Rejection sensitivity and the rejection-hostility link in romantic relationships
Romero‐Canyas, R., Downey, G., Berenson, K., Ayduk, O., & Kang, N. J. (2010) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00611.x · Cited by 297
Chapter 6 Ostracism: A Temporal Need‐Threat Model
Williams, K. D. (2009) · Advances in experimental social psychology · Cited by 270
Social Acceptance and Rejection: The Sweet and the Bitter
DeWall, C. N., & Bushman, B. J. (2011) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411417545 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayduk, Ö., Gyurak, A., & Luerssen, A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ayduk, Özlem
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 775-782
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2836513
- OpenAlex
- W2093312722
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5t32mh020006-19)
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020006), R01MH069703)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- social rejection, aggression, rejection sensitivity, individual differences, moderated effects, neuroticism, interpersonal rejection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
