Cited by 105Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyBehavioral Health and Interventions

Cognitive consequences of affirming the self: The relationship between self-affirmation and object construal

Open access
Wakslak, Cheryl J., Trope, Yaacov·2009·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Abstract

Previous research suggests that affirming one's important values is a powerful way of protecting one's general self integrity, allowing non-defensive processing of self-relevant information. In a series of four studies linking self-affirmation with construal level, we find that in addition to any self buffering effect, thinking about one's values and why they are important more generally shifts cognitive processing towards superordinate and structured thinking. Self-affirmation leads participants to perceive a greater degree of structure within their selves (Study 1), to increasingly identify actions in terms of their endstates (Study 2), to more strongly distinguish between primary and secondary object features (Study 3) and to perform better on tasks requiring abstract, structured thinking than those requiring detail-oriented, concrete thinking. Together, these findings suggest that thinking about important values helps individuals to structure information and focus on the big picture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.002

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When self-affirmed, people can see the many ordinary stressors of daily life in the context of the big picture.

    “But when self-affirmed, people can see the many ordinary stressors of daily life in the context of the big picture (Schmeichel & Vohs 2009, Wakslak & Trope 2009).”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Wakslak & Trope 2009

    The General discussion reports that self-affirmation promotes a “big picture approach” and proposes that it might reduce defensiveness by helping people distinguish immediate concerns from longer-term goals. The paper does not establish that people view the many ordinary stressors of daily life in that way specifically. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Bargh JA Chen M Burrows L Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996 71 230 244 8765481
  2. Bargh JA Gollwitzer PM Lee-Chai A Barndollar K Trotschel R The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001 81 1014 1027 11761304 PMC3005626
  3. Creswell JD Welch W Taylor SE Sherman DK Gruenewald T Mann T Affirmation of personal values buffers neuroendocrine and psychological stress responses Psychological Science 2005 16 846 851 16262767
  4. DeCoster J Claypool HM A meta-analysis of priming effects on impression formation supporting a general model of informational biases Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004 8 2 27 15121538
  5. Fein S Spencer SJ Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997 73 31 44
  6. Förster J Friedman RS Liberman N Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004 87 177 189 15301626
  7. Förster J Liberman N Friedman RS Seven principles of goal activation: A systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal constructs Personality and Social Psychology Review 2007 11 211 233 18453462
  8. Freitas AL Salovey P Liberman N Abstract and concrete self-evaluative goals Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001 80 410 412 11300575
  9. Fujita K Trope Y Liberman N Levin-Sagi M Construal level and self control Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006 90 351 367 16594824 PMC3153425
  10. Gasper K Clore GL Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information Psychological Science 2002 13 34 40 11892776
  11. Henderson MD Fujita K Trope Y Liberman N Transcending the “here”: The effect of spatial distance on social judgment Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006 91 845 856 17059305
  12. Higgins ET Rholes WS Jones CR Category accessibility and impression formation Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1977 13 141 154
  13. Isen AM Daubman KA The influence of affect on categorization Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984 47 1206 1217
  14. Kawakami K Dovidio JF Dijksterhuis A Effect of social category priming on personal attitudes Psychological Science 2003 14 315 319 12807403
  15. Labroo AA Patrick VM Psychological distancing: Why happiness helps you see the big picture Journal of Consumer Research 2008 35 800 809
  16. Ledgerwood A Chaiken S Priming us and them: Automatic assimilation and contrast in group attitudes Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007 93 940 956 18072847
  17. Liberman N Trope Y The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998 75 5 18
  18. Nussbaum S Trope Y Liberman N Creeping dispositionism: The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003 84 485 497 12635911
  19. Sherman DK Cohen GL Zanna MP The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory Advances in experimental social psychology 2006 Vol. 38 San Diego, CA Academic Press 183 242
  20. Siegel PA Scillitoe J Parks-Yancy R Reducing the tendency to self-handicap: The effect of self-affirmation Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005 41 589 597
  21. Simon L Greenberg J Brehm J Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995 68 247 260
  22. Smith ER Branscombe NR Procedurally mediated social inferences: The case of category accessibility effects Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1987 23 361 382
  23. Steele CM Liu TJ Dissonance processes as self-affirmation Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983 45 5 19
  24. Trope Y Liberman N Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000 79 876 889 11138758
  25. Trope Y Liberman N Temporal construal Psychological Review 2003 110 403 421 12885109
  26. Trope Y Liberman N Wakslak C Construal levels and psychological distance. Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior Journal of Consumer Psychology 2007 17 83 95 PMC3150814 21822366
  27. Vallacher RR Wegner DM Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989 57 660 671 2926623
  28. Wakslak CJ Nussbaum S Liberman N Trope Y Representations of the self in the near and distant future Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008 95 757 773 18808258 PMC3153422
  29. Wakslak CJ Trope Y Liberman N Alony R Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006 135 641 653 17087578

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wakslak, C. J., & Trope, Y.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Wakslak, Cheryl J.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
927-932
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053577021
Cited by
105
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH059030)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
self-affirmation, construal level, self-integrity, values affirmation, abstract thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review