Cited by 375Behavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and HealthDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Self-Affirmation Reduces Biased Processing of Health-Risk Information

Reed, Mark B., Aspinwall, Lisa G.·1998·Motivation and Emotion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021463221281

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • However, in some studies, affirmed participants fail to make the behavioral changes that they predict they will.

    “However, in some studies, affirmed participants fail to make the behavioral changes that they predict they will (Harris et al. 2007, Harris & Napper 2005, Reed & Aspinwall 1998; for a review, see Harris & Epton 2010).”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Reed & Aspinwall 1998

  • Positive psychological constructs appear to affect attention and cognitive processing.

    “Positive psychological constructs appear to affect attention and cognitive processing.”
  • Positive experiences and cognitions can help people better attend to and process health information, including unbiased and open appraisal of negative health information.

    “Positive experiences and cognitions can help people better attend to and process health information [37], including unbiased and open appraisal of negative health information [56].”
  • In the Reed and Aspinwall (1998) study, heavy caffeine consumers who were affirmed oriented more rapidly to risk-confirming information, viewed it as more convincing, and recalled less risk-disconfirming information at a one-week follow-up.

    “The heavy caVeine consumers who were aYrmed oriented more rapidly to the risk-confirming information, that is, they looked at this information more quickly and viewed it as more convincing.Furthermore, the aYrmed heavy caVeine consumers recalled less risk-disconfirming information at a one-week follow-up.”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Reed & Aspinwall, 1998

  • Self-affirmation may promote more positive health behaviors by making people more open to information that they are engaging in risky health behaviors.

    “Indirectly, it may promote more positive health behaviors by making people more open to information that they are engaging in risky health behaviors (Harris & Napper, 2005;Reed & Aspinwall, 1998;Sherman et al., 2000).”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Reed & Aspinwall, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reed, M. B., & Aspinwall, L. G.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Motivation and Emotion
Published
1998-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
99-132
ISSN
  • 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6644
OpenAlex
W149926111
Cited by
374
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
self-affirmation, confirmation bias, self-relevant information, caffeine consumption, fibrocystic breast disease, perceived personal control, self-regulation, risk perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review