Cited by 405Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The cessation of rumination through self-affirmation.

Koole, Sander L., Smeets, Karianne, van Knippenberg, Ad, Dijksterhuis, Ap·1999·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 224349.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.111

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People can thus better deal with the threat in a constructive way, rather than spend mental energy on avoidance, suppression, and rationalization.

    “People can thus better deal with the threat in a constructive way, rather than spend mental energy on avoidance, suppression, and rationalization (see Koole et al. 1999, Taylor & Walton 2011).”
  • Internet interventions can reduce depression symptoms, including for people who might otherwise lack access to treatment.

    “Several meta-analyses of internet and computerized interventions, both self-help and clinician-assisted[31,32,33,34], found that internet interventions can reduce symptoms of depression, including among those who might otherwise lack access to treatment.”
  • Participants who affirmed an important aspect of the self were less likely to ruminate after failure.

    “Those participants who aYrmed an important aspect of the self by completing the values scale were less likely to ruminate after failure (Koole et al., 1999).”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Koole et al., 1999

  • Self-affirmation reduces the stressfulness of evaluative situations and the cognitive accessibility of threatening cognitions.

    “It also reduces the stressfulness of evaluative situations (Creswell et al., 2005) and the cognitive accessibility of threatening cognitions (Koole et al., 1999).”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Koole et al., 1999

  • In Koole et al. (1999), self-affirmation led to increases in implicit positive mood, which in turn was associated with decreases in ruminative thought.

    “self-aYrmation led to increases in implicit positive mood, which in turn was associated with decreases in ruminative thought.”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Koole et al., 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koole, S. L., Smeets, K., van Knippenberg, A., & Dijksterhuis, A.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1999-07
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
111-125
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1992554080
Cited by
403
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
rumination, self-affirmation, self-affirmation theory, self-concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review