Cited by 13Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and Health

Self-affirmation and motivational interviewing: integrating perspectives to reduce resistance and increase efficacy of alcohol interventions

Ehret, Phillip J., LaBrie, Joseph W., Santerre, Craig, Sherman, David K.·2015·Health Psychology Review

Abstract

To promote efforts at reducing problematic alcohol use and improving health outcomes, the present review proposes an integration of a social psychological approach - self-affirmation theory - with a clinical psychology intervention - motivational interviewing. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a popular empirically-designed treatment approach that has shown moderate success at reducing drinking and improving health, especially with resistant drinkers. Experiments informed by self-affirmation theory have found that people exhibit reduced defensiveness to threatening health messages and increased intentions to reduce alcohol consumption when affirmed. This review focuses on the mechanisms by which self-affirmation reduces resistance and how these mechanisms are complementary to the MI approach. Further, the review outlines suggestions for conducting and integrating self-affirmation into a MI intervention and provides recommendations for future empirical research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17437199.2013.840953

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehret, P. J., LaBrie, J. W., Santerre, C., & Sherman, D. K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Loyola Marymount University (US)
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Ehret, Phillip J.
Venue
Health Psychology Review
Published
2013-10-17
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
83-102
ISSN
  • 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-7202
OpenAlex
W2141153564
Cited by
13
References
86
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
self-affirmation theory, motivational interviewing, alcohol interventions, alcohol abuse, treatment resistance, alcohol consumption reduction, intervention integration, health behavior change
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Health Promotion, Humans, Psychological Theory, Health Behavior, Self Efficacy, Intention, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review