Cited by 81Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Subtle priming of shared human experiences eliminates threat-induced negativity toward Arabs, immigrants, and peace-making

Open access
Motyl, Matt, Hart, Joshua, Pyszczynski, Tom, Weise, David, Maxfield, Molly, Siedel, Angelika·2011·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Abstract

Many studies demonstrate that mortality salience can increase negativity toward outgroups butfew have examined variables that mitigate this effect. The present research examined whethersubtly priming people to think of human experiences shared by people from diverse culturesincreases perceived similarity of members of different groups, which then reduces MS-inducednegativity toward outgroups. In Study 1, exposure to pictures of people from diverse culturesengaged in common human activities non-significantly reversed the effect of MS on implicitanti-Arab prejudice. In Study 2, thinking about similarities between one’s own favoritechildhood memories and those of people from other countries eliminated MS-induced explicitnegative attitudes toward immigrants. In Study 3, thinking about similarities between one’s ownpainful childhood memories and those of people from other countries eliminated the MS-inducedreduction in support for peace-making. Mediation analyses suggest the effects were driven byperceived similarity of people across cultures. These findings suggest that priming widely sharedhuman experiences can attenuate MS-induced intergroup conflict.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.010

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mortality salience increased negative attitudes towards immigration, except when participants connected with childhood stories authored by individuals from out-groups.

    “MS increased negative attitudes towards immigration (worldview defense), except when participants connected with childhood stories authored by individuals from out-groups.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Motyl, M., Hart, J., Pyszczynski, T., Weise, D., Maxfield, M., & Siedel, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Union College (US)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Motyl, Matt
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
1179-1184
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122922863
Cited by
81
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
mortality salience, intergroup prejudice, immigrants, perceived similarity, shared human experience, priming, childhood memories, intergroup conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review