Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides
Abstract
The political landscape in the US and many other countries is characterized by policy impasses and animosity between rival political groups. Research finds that these divisions are fueled in part by disparate moral concerns and convictions that undermine communication and understanding between liberals and conservatives. This “moral empathy gap” is particularly evident in the moral underpinnings of the political arguments members of each side employ when trying to persuade one another. Both liberals and conservatives typically craft arguments based on their own moral convictions rather than the convictions of the people they target for persuasion. As a result, these moral arguments tend to be unpersuasive, even offensive, to their recipients. The technique of moral reframing —whereby a position an individual would not normally support is framed in a way that is consistent with that individual's moral values—can be an effective means for political communication and persuasion. Over the last decade, studies of moral reframing have shown its effectiveness across a wide range of polarized topics, including views of economic inequality, environmental protection, same‐sex marriage, and major party candidates for the US presidency. In this article, we review the moral reframing literature, examining potential mediators and moderators of the effect, and discuss important questions that remain unanswered about this phenomenon.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several messaging approaches may be effective, including emphasizing the benefits to the recipient, focusing on protecting others, aligning with the recipient's moral values, appealing to social consensus or scientific norms, and/or highlighting social group approval.
“Several messaging approaches may be effective, including emphasizing the benefits to the recipient 146 , focusing on protecting others (for example, 'wash your hands to protect your parents and grandparents' 147 ), aligning with the recipient's moral values 148 , appealing to social consensus or scientific norms 149-151 and/or highlighting social group approval 152,153 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [148]
Moral reframing that engages a given audience's moral perspective is a well-documented effective strategy.
“This directly contradicts a well-documented effective strategy of moral reframing that engages a given audience's (rather than the speaker's) moral perspective (Feinberg & Willer, 2019).”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Feinberg & Willer, 2019
Framing environmental issues in terms of conservative values such as purity, sanctity, commerce or patriotism might lead conservatives to express more support for pro-environmental legislation.
“framing environmental issues in terms of conservative values such as purity, sanctity, commerce or patriotism might lead conservatives to express more support for pro-environmental legislation275–279.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [275]
Cites
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 17,604 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Framing is the use of a “central organizing idea or story line that provides meaning (to an issue or event)” (Gamson & Modigliani, 1987, p. 143; see also Druckman, 2001; Gitlin, 1980; Scheufele & Iyengar, 2012; Tversky & Kahneman, 1981).”
MethodPolitical conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similarly, egalitarianism and social justice may be aspects of the fairness foundation that resonate most strongly with liberals, compared to other aspects of fairness like proportionality (i.e., equity; Haidt, 2012; Jost et al., 2003).”
BackgroundLiberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560 · see citing works
The righteous mind: why good people are divided by politics and religion
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-7185 · Cited by 4,347 · see citing works
The self-importance of moral identity
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423 · Cited by 3,522 · see citing works
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021847 · Cited by 2,666 · see citing works
When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z · Cited by 2,385 · see citing works
Political Polarization in the American Public
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836 · Cited by 1,798 · see citing works
Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.
Cohen, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808 · Cited by 1,400 · see citing works
Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.853 · Cited by 1,400 · see citing works
The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence
Druckman, J. (2001) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1015006907312 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612449177 · Cited by 928 · see citing works
Self-citationThinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions
Tetlock, P. E. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00135-9 · Cited by 915 · see citing works
Moral Conviction: Another Contributor to Attitude Strength or Something More?
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
Personality and Politics: Values, Traits, and Political Choice
Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S. H., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.x · Cited by 812 · see citing works
Moral politics: what conservatives know that liberals don't
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-1814 · Cited by 799 · see citing works
Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Dispositions of Self-Identified Libertarians
Iyer, R., Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042366 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209351435 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes
Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Party Identification and Core Political Values
Goren, P. (2005) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00161.x · Cited by 640 · see citing works
Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.005 · Cited by 596 · see citing works
Disgust and the moralization of purity.
Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., Keltner, D. J., & Cohen, A. B. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017423 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Hirsh, J. B., Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611436349 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Getting Liberals and Conservatives to Go Green: Political Ideology and Congruent Appeals
Kidwell, B., Farmer, A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/670610 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Basic Personal Values and the Meaning of Left‐Right Political Orientations in 20 Countries
Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H., & Davidov, E. (2011) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1706588114 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Wankel, C. (2009) · Encyclopedia of Business in Today's World · doi:10.4135/9781412964289.n49 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Hirsh, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., Xu, X., & Peterson, J. B. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210366854 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Cisneros, J. D. (2008) · Rhetoric and Public Affairs · doi:10.1353/rap.0.0068 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Kahan, D. M. (2016) · Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0417 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911402384 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., & Haidt, J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050092 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy
Amin, A., Bednarczyk, R., Ray, C. E., Melchiori, K. J., Graham, J., Huntsinger, J., & Omer, S. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0256-5 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality?
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Bettache, K. (2011) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430210395637 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M., & Lelkes, Y. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036170 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Scott Atran, B., & Axelrod, R. (2008) · Negotiation Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00182.x · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Valenzuela, S., Piña, M., & Ramírez, J. (2017) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12325 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215607842 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationShen, F., & Edwards, H. H. (2005) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03023.x · Cited by 258 · see citing works
When Does Recognition Increase Charitable Behavior? Toward a Moral Identity-Based Model
Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Aquino, K. F. (2013) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.11.0477 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
McCright, A. M., Charters, M., Dentzman, K., & Dietz, T. (2016) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12171 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Shifting Liberal and Conservative Attitudes Using Moral Foundations Theory
Day, M. V., Fiske, S., Downing, E., & Trail, T. E. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214551152 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
7 Left–Right Orientations and Party Choice
van der Eijk, C., Schmitt, H., & Binder, T. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199273219.003.0007 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Whitmarsh, L. E., & Corner, A. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.008 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Understanding the process of moralization: How eating meat becomes a moral issue.
Feinberg, M., Kovacheff, C., Teper, R., & Inbar, Y. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000149 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationHow to Win Friends & Influence People
Carnegie, D. (1936) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Rights, Economics, or Family?Frame Resonance, Political Ideology, and the Immigrant Rights Movement
Bloemraad, I., Silva, F., & Voss, K. (2016) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sov123 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
From My Cold, Dead Hands: Democratic Consequences of Sacred Rhetoric
Marietta, M. (2008) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381608080742 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
The moral pop-out effect: Enhanced perceptual awareness of morally relevant stimuli
Gantman, A. P., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.007 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Brannon, T. N., Carter, E. R., Murdock‐Perriera, L. A., & Higginbotham, G. D. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12040 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Bleeding Hearts and the Heartless: Popular Perceptions of Liberal and Conservative Ideologies
Farwell, L., & Weiner, B. L. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167200269009 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Values, Frames, and Persuasion in Presidential Nomination Campaigns
Barker, D. C. (2005) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-005-8145-4 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Morally Reframed Arguments Can Affect Support for Political Candidates
Voelkel, J., & Feinberg, M. (2017) · Social Psychology and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617729408 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationShen, F. (2004) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02617.x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Franks, A. S., & Scherr, K. C. (2015) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12074 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Moralization Through Moral Shock
Wisneski, D. C., & Skitka, L. J. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216676479 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Slovic, P., Gastil, J., & Cohen, G. L. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1017189 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Moral Concerns and Policy Attitudes: Investigating the Influence of Elite Rhetoric
Clifford, S., Jerit, J., Rainey, C., & Motyl, M. S. (2015) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.944320 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
The Effects of Status-Organizing and Social Identity Processes on Patterns of Social Influence
Kalkhoff, W., & Barnum, C. (2000) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2695886 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Moral Empathy Gaps and the American Culture War
Ditto, P. H., & Koleva, S. P. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911402393 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Hoover, J., JOHNSON, K., Boghrati, R., Graham, J., & Dehghani, M. (2018) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.129 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
The Problem with Morality: Impeding Progress and Increasing Divides
Kovacheff, C., Schwartz, S., Inbar, Y., & Feinberg, M. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12045 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationVoelkel, J. G., & Brandt, M. J. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218798822 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Dehghani, M., Sagae, K., Sachdeva, S. S., & Gratch, J. S. (2013) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2013.826613 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Leaders’ Use of Moral Justifications Increases Policy Support
Zant, A. B. V., & Moore, D. A. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615572909 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Economic Issues Are Moral Issues: The Moral Underpinnings of the Desire to Reduce Wealth Inequality
Franks, A. S., & Scherr, K. C. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550618772821 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Lee, Y., Yoon, S., Lee, Y. W., & Stafford, M. R. (2018) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.16.180 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Personalizing Moral Reframing in Interpersonal Conversation: A Field Experiment
Kalla, J. L., Levine, A. S., & Broockman, D. E. (2022) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/716944 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The Gag Reflex: Disgust Rhetoric and Gay Rights in American Politics
Gadarian, S. K., & van der Vort, E. (2017) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9412-x · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Finding the Right Value: Framing Effects on Domain Experts
Andrews, A. C., Clawson, R. A., Gramig, B. M., & Raymond, L. (2016) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12339 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Enke, B. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24268 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Feinberg, M., Wehling, E., Chung, J. M., Saslow, L. R., & Paulin, I. M. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000255 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationMarket Segmentation by Personal Values and Salient Product Attributes
Boote, A. S. (1981) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.1080/00218499.1981.12468195 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Voelkel, J. G., & Willer, R. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3385818 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationCostly Values: The Limited Benefits and Potential Costs of Targeted Policy Justifications
Peterson, E., & Simonovits, G. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2017.3 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Success-Breeds-Success in Collective Political Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment
van de Rijt, A., Akın, A. İ., Willer, R., & Feinberg, M. (2016) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v3.a41 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citation5. Racial Purity, Sexual Purity, and Immigration Policy
Valverde, M. (2008) · University of Toronto Press eBooks · doi:10.3138/9781442689268-008 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z · Cited by 4,964 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Potential of Generative AI for Personalized Persuasion at Scale
Matz, S., Teeny, J., Vaid, S. S., Peters, H., Harari, G. M., & Cerf, M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rn97c · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
The potential of generative AI for personalized persuasion at scale
Matz, S. C., Teeny, J. D., Vaid, S. S., Peters, H., Harari, G. M., & Cerf, M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53755-0 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries
Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Todorova, B., Berkebile-Weinberg, M., Grayson, S., Patel, Y. H., Goldwert, D., Pei, Y., Chakroff, A., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adj5778 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda
Huang, D., Jin, X., & Coghlan, A. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120594 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
A Framework for the Study of Persuasion
Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-110428 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
The role of worldviews in shaping how people appraise climate change
Hornsey, M. J. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.021 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?
Philipp-Muller, A. Z., Lee, S. W. S., & Petty, R. E. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2120755119 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
The Psychology of Framing: How Everyday Language Shapes the Way We Think, Feel, and Act
Flusberg, S. J., Holmes, K. J., Thibodeau, P. H., Nabi, R. L., & Matlock, T. (2024) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1177/15291006241246966 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Molder, A. L., Lakind, A., Clemmons, Z. E., & Chen, K. (2021) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612211055691 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Large language models can infer psychological dispositions of social media users
Peters, H., & Matz, S. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae231 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Quantifying the potential persuasive returns to political microtargeting
Tappin, B. M., Wittenberg, C., Hewitt, L. B., Berinsky, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2216261120 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Receptiveness to Opposing Views: Conceptualization and Integrative Review
Minson, J. A., & Chen, F. S. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683211061037 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Telkamp, J. B., & Anderson, M. H. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05057-6 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Using Social and Behavioural Science to Support COVID-19 Pandemic ResponsePreprint
Bavel, J. J. V., D, K. B. A., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A. K., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4178356 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationAttitude strength: Distinguishing predictors versus defining features
Luttrell, A., & Sawicki, V. (2020) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12555 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Moral values predict county-level COVID-19 vaccination rates in the United States.
Reimer, N. K., Atari, M., Karimi-Malekabadi, F., Trager, J. P., Kennedy, B., Graham, J., & Dehghani, M. (2022) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0001020 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Understanding the effects of partisan identity on climate change
Doell, K. C., Pärnamets, P., Harris, E., Hackel, L. M., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.013 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The effect of spokesperson attribution on public health message sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic
Abu-Akel, A. M., Spitz, A., & West, R. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245100 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Cole, J. C., Gillis, A. J., van der Linden, S., Cohen, M. A., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2025) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231186409 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Silver, E., Goff, K., & Iceland, J. (2022) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12303 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Responsibility towards future generations is a strong predictor of proenvironmental engagement
Syropoulos, S., & Markowitz, E. M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102218 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Braca, A., & Dondio, P. (2023) · Italian Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1007/s43039-023-00077-0 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Winterich, K. P., Reczek, R. W., & Makov, T. (2023) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-023-00981-z · Cited by 55 · see citing works
How to study democratic backsliding
Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12942 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Reconsidering Tweets: Intervening during Tweet Creation Decreases Offensive Content
Katsaros, M., Yang, K., & Fratamico, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19308 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Addressing Climate Change with Behavioral Science: A Global Intervention Tournament in 63 CountriesPreprint
Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/cr5at · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Conservatism predicts aversion to consequential Artificial Intelligence
Castelo, N., & Ward, A. F. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261467 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
The levers of political persuasion with conversational artificial intelligence
Hackenburg, K., Tappin, B. M., Hewitt, L., Saunders, E., Black, S., Lin, H., Fist, C., Margetts, H. Z., Rand, D. G., & Summerfield, C. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aea3884 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Using General Messages to Persuade on a Politicized Scientific Issue
Green, J., Druckman, J., Baum, M., Lazer, D., Ognyanova, K., Simonson, M. D., Lin, J., Santillana, M., & Perlis, R. (2022) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123422000424 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Kodapanakkal, R. I., Brandt, M., Kogler, C., & van Beest, I. (2022) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1177/09567976211040803 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Hooker, C., & Leask, J. (2020) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-020-10057-0 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Threats to Science: Politicization, Misinformation, and Inequalities
Druckman, J. (2022) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162221095431 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Matz, S., Beck, E. D., Atherton, O. E., White, M., Rauthmann, J., Mroczek, D., Kim, M., & Bogg, T. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231191774 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Ramos, G., Johnson, W. A., VanEpps, E. M., & Graham, J. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1427 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Changing Americans’ Attitudes about Immigration: Using Moral Framing to Bolster Factual Arguments
Voelkel, J., Malik, M., Redekopp, C., & Willer, R. (2021) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162221083877 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationSpampatti, T., Hahnel, U. J. J., Trutnevyte, E., & Brosch, T. (2022) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113070 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Thomas, C., Walton, G. M., Reinhart, E. C., & Markus, H. R. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104424 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Intergroup psychological interventions: The motivational challenge.
Landry, A., & Halperin, E. (2023) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0001289 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Scaling language model size yields diminishing returns for single-message political persuasion
Hackenburg, K., Tappin, B. M., Röttger, P., Hale, S. A., Bright, J., & Margetts, H. Z. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2413443122 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Çakanlar, A., Trudel, R., & White, K. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/711834 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Enculturating the Science of International Development: Beyond the WEIRD Independent Paradigm
Thomas, C., & Markus, H. R. (2023) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/00220221221128211 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Psychological and contextual determinants of clean energy technology adoption
Günther, A., Engel, L., Hornsey, M. J., Nielsen, K. S., Roy, J., Steg, L., Tam, K., van Valkengoed, A. M., Wolske, K. S., Wong‐Parodi, G., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Clean Technology · doi:10.1038/s44359-025-00075-9 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The sanctity of life: The role of purity in attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia
Lockhart, C., Lee, C. H. J., Sibley, C., & Osborne, D. (2022) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12877 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Moral reframing of messages about mask-wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic
Kaplan, J. T., Vaccaro, A. G., Henning, M., & Christov-Moore, L. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37075-3 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Advancing research and practice of psychological intergroup interventions
Čehajić‐Clancy, S., & Halperin, E. (2024) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00330-z · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Partisan conflict over content moderation is more than disagreement about facts
Appel, R. E., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg6799 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Hackenburg, K., Ibrahim, L., Tappin, B. M., & Manos Tsakiris, A. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02464-x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Fully experimental conceptual engineering
Andow, J. (2020) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2020.1850339 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Reckless spreader or blameless victim? How vaccination status affects responses to COVID-19 patients
Claudy, M., Vijayakumar, S., & Campbell, N. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115089 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Spirituality is associated with Covid-19 vaccination scepticism
Zarzeczna, N., Bertlich, T., Većkalov, B., & Rutjens, B. T. (2022) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.050 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Nan, X.-L., Wang, Y., Thier, K., Adebamowo, C. A., Quinn, S., & Ntiri, S. O. (2022) · Journal of health communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2022.2160526 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Kim, I., Hammond, M. D., & Milfont, T. L. (2023) · Social Psychology · doi:10.32872/spb.8557 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Performing crisis to create your enemy: Europe vs. the EU in Hungarian populist discourse
Sata, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2023.1032470 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Sensemaking and the Chemtrail Conspiracy on the Internet: Insights from Believers and Ex-believers
Xiao, S., Cheshire, C., & Bruckman, A. S. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479598 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Political orientation, moral foundations, and COVID-19 social distancing
Tarry, H., Vézina, V., Bailey, J. M., & Lopes, L. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267136 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Syropoulos, S., & Markowitz, E. M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102006 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Syropoulos, S., Law, K. F., Kraft‐Todd, G., Mah, A. Y. J., Markowitz, E. M., & Young, L. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12775 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Claudy, M., Parkinson, M., & Aquino, K. F. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123384 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Testing persuasive messaging to encourage COVID-19 risk reduction
Bokemper, S., Huber, G. A., James, E. K., Gerber, A. S., & Omer, S. B. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264782 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
The social psychological roots of violent intergroup conflict
Saguy, T., & Reifen‐Tagar, M. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00083-7 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Scales, D. A., Gorman, J. M., DiCaprio, P., Hurth, L., Radhakrishnan, M., Windham, S., Akunne, A., Florman, J., Leininger, L. J., & Starks, T. J. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107609 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Moral reframing increases support for economically progressive candidates
Voelkel, J. G., Mernyk, J. S., & Willer, R. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad154 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationHackenburg, K., Brady, W. J., & Manos Tsakiris, A. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad189 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Intergroup Conflict Over Climate Change: Problems and Solutions
Hornsey, M. J., Fielding, K. S., Marshall, G. C., & Louis, W. R. (2024) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.3127 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Advocating for Mask-Wearing Across the Aisle: Applying Moral Reframing in Health Communication
Luttrell, A., & Trentadue, J. T. (2023) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2022.2163535 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Moral Foundations, Himpathy, and Punishment Following Organizational Sexual Misconduct Allegations
Dodson, S. J., Goodwin, R., Graham, J., & Diekmann, K. A. (2023) · Organization science (Providence, R.I.) · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1652 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
How the effects of emphasizing ethics are examined: a systematic review of moral framing experiments
Brugman, B. C. (2024) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2024.2393845 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The effects of short messages encouraging prevention behaviors early in the COVID-19 pandemic
Pink, S. L., Stagnaro, M., Chu, J., Mernyk, J., Voelkel, J., & Willer, R. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0284354 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationSoundscapes of morality: Linking music preferences and moral values through lyrics and audio
Preniqi, V., Kalimeri, K., & Saitis, C. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294402 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Exploring morality in argumentation
Kobbe, J., Rehbein, I., Hulpuş, I., & Stuckenschmidt, H. (2020) · MADOC (University of Mannheim) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Depoliticizing DEI: Path to fulfillment of its core values and effective implementation
Myeong, H. (2024) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2024.56 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Welsch, H. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-021-00745-7 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Parasocial diffusion: K-pop fandoms help drive COVID-19 public health messaging on social media
Chang, H.-C. H., Pham, B., & Ferrara, E. (2021) · Online Soc. Networks Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100267 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Art of Healthy Neurophilocommunication
Anurogo, D., Sasmita, N. S., Syarif, U. A., Awaliah, N. R., Rachman, B. M., & 家儀), J. Y. W. J. Y. W. (. (2023) · Multicultural Islamic Education Review · doi:10.23917/mier.v1i2.2893 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Barnes, P., Morris, M. P., Pierce, A. L., & Shaffer, T. J. (2022) · Journal of Public Affairs Education · doi:10.1080/15236803.2022.2148604 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A systematic review on political ideology and persuasion
Çakanlar, A., & White, K. (2023) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21894 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Welsch, H. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107026 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Ideology as Filter: Motivated Information Processing and Decision-Making in the Energy Domain
Hahnel, U. J. J., Mumenthaler, C., Spampatti, T., & Brosch, T. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208429 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Relihan, D. P., Holman, E. A., Garfin, D. R., Ditto, P. H., & Silver, R. C. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12894 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Gainsburg, I., Roy, S., & Lee, J. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-34338-x · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Dismantling Gender Blindness in Online Discussion of a Crime/Gender Dichotomy
Qin, Y., Duan, W., Wu, Q., & Lu, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3653686 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Herberz, M., Brosch, T., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101972 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Pearson, G., Douglas, J. E., Wolframm, I., & Furtado, T. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13193137 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Zhang, B. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2024.2348236 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Decoding Culture: Tools for Behavioral Strategists
Koçak, Ö., & Puranam, P. (2023) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2022.0008 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Yu, B. Y., Lam, C., & Chan, C. S. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12941 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Moral framing in Ukraine war coverage
Parmelee, J. H., Roman, N., & Beasley, B. A. (2024) · Media War & Conflict · doi:10.1177/17506352241264197 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Moving beyond us-versus-them polarization towards constructive conversations
Doornbosch, L. M., van Vuuren, M., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2024) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2024.2401127 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Gillis, A. J., Geiger, N., Raimi, K. T., Lee, J., & Sarge, M. A. (2023) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-023-03519-y · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Xu, B. (2023) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32022-4_30 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
(2024) · FWU Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.51709/19951272/spring2024/11 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Bolte, S., Klackl, J., Hansen, J., Jonas, E., & Uhl-Hädicke, I. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102330 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Morgan, J. C., Badlis, S., Head, K. J., Zimet, G. D., Cappella, J. N., & Kornides, M. L. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/54657 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Enhancing engagement in workplace belonging efforts: Why moral processes matter
Maneethai, D., Johnson, L. U., Atwater, L. A., & Witt, L. (2025) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2024.60 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Factors Associated With COVID-19 Behavioral Intentions: Findings From an Online Survey
Lama, Y., Budenz, A., Gaysynsky, A., Iles, I. A., & Chou, W. S. (2022) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/08901171221093036 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Dissecting moral judgements: Using moral foundation theory to advance the contingency continuum
Xu, M., Cropp, F., & Cameron, G. (2023) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102370 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Autonomy, Evidence-Responsiveness, and the Ethics of Influence
Niker, F., Felsen, G., Nagel, S. K., & Reiner, P. B. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84494-3_6 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Beyond persuasion: Improving conversational quality around high-stakes interpersonal disagreementsPreprint
Minson, J. A., Hagmann, D., & Luo, K. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/5w3dg · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Feinberg, M., & Willer, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feinberg, Matthew
- Venue
- Social and Personality Psychology Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 1751-9004 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996728347
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social and Personality Psychology Compass (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- moral reframing, political polarization, persuasion, political communication, liberals and conservatives, moral argument, moral values, economic inequality, environmental protection, same-sex marriage, presidential candidates
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review