Cited by 42Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Money as an existential anxiety buffer: Exposure to money prevents mortality reminders from leading to increased death thoughts

Gasiorowska, Agata, Zaleskiewicz, Tomasz, Kesebir, Pelin·2018·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.09.004

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gasiorowska, A., Zaleskiewicz, T., & Kesebir, P.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
79
Pages
394-409
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893524675
Cited by
42
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Centre (DEC-2012/07/B/HS6/02580, DEC-2013/11/B/HS6/01316)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
mortality salience, fear of death, existential anxiety, self-esteem, self-worth, death thoughts, cross-cultural comparison, Poland, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review