The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extraction and quantification of polyphenols from kinnow ( Citrus reticulate L.) peel using ultrasound and maceration techniques
Open accessAbstract
An investigation was carried out to extract polyphenols from the peel of kinnow (Citrus reticulate L.) by maceration and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) techniques. The antioxidant potential of these polyphenols was evaluated using ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and superoxide radical scavenging assays; and their antimicrobial activity was assessed against bacterial strains Staphyloccoccus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Salmonella typhimurium. The highest extraction yield was obtained through the solvent ethanol at 80% concentration level, whereas UAE was a more efficient technique and yielded comparatively higher polyphenol contents than maceration. Maximum polyphenols were extracted with 80% methanol [32.48 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g extract] using UAE, whereas minimum phenolics (8.64 mg GAE/g extract) were obtained with 80% ethyl acetate through the maceration technique. Elevated antioxidant activity of kinnow peel extracts was exhibited in three antioxidant assays, where 80% methanolic extracts showed the highest antioxidant activity (27.67±1.11mM/100 g for FRAP) and the highest scavenging activity, 72.83±0.65% and 64.80±0.91% for DPPH and superoxide anion radical assays, respectively. Strong correlations between total polyphenols and antioxidant activity were recorded. Eleven phenolic compounds-including five phenolic acids and six flavonoids-were identified and quantified by high performance liquid chromatography. Ferulic acid and hesperidin were the most abundant compounds whereas caffeic acid was the least abundant phenolic compound in kinnow peel extracts. Maximum inhibition zone was recorded against S. aureus (16.00±0.58 mm) whereas minimum inhibition zone was noted against S. typhimurium (9.00±1.16 mm). It was concluded that kinnow mandarin peels, being a potential source of phenolic compounds with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, may be used as an ingredient for the preparation of functional foods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Official Methods of Analysis of
(1980) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50052a726 · Cited by 59,330
Official Methods of Analysis: 22nd Edition (2023)
(2023) · Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL · doi:10.1093/9780197610145.002.001 · Cited by 28,007
Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity
Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., & Berset, C. (1995) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0023-6438(95)80008-5 · Cited by 25,994
The Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) as a Measure of “Antioxidant Power”: The FRAP Assay
Benzie, I. F. F., & Strain, J. J. (1996) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1006/abio.1996.0292 · Cited by 22,951
Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R., & Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. (1999) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99017-1 · Cited by 19,125
Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in 32 selected herbs
WOJDYLO, A., OSZMIANSKI, J., & CZEMERYS, R. (2007) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.038 · Cited by 2,023
Do, Q. D., Angkawijaya, A. E., Tran-Nguyen, P. L., Huynh, L. H., Soetaredjo, F. E., Ismadji, S., & Ju, Y.-H. (2014) · Journal of Food and Drug Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfda.2013.11.001 · Cited by 1,909
Applications and opportunities for ultrasound assisted extraction in the food industry — A review
Vilkhu, K., Mawson, R., Simons, L., & Bates, D. (2008) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2007.04.014 · Cited by 1,394
Citrus flavonoids: Molecular structure, biological activity and nutritional properties: A review
Tripoli, E., Guardia, M. L., Giammanco, S., Majo, D. D., & Giammanco, M. (2007) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.11.054 · Cited by 1,177
Pressurized liquid extraction as a green approach in food and herbal plants extraction: A review
Mustafa, A., & Turner, C. (2011) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2011.07.018 · Cited by 1,104
Cited by
Phenolic composition, antioxidant potential and health benefits of citrus peel
Singh, B., Singh, J. P., Kaur, A., & Singh, N. (2020) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109114 · Cited by 711
Extraction of polyphenolic antioxidants from orange peel waste using deep eutectic solvents
Ozturk, B., Parkinson, C., & Gonzalez-Miquel, M. (2018) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2018.05.052 · Cited by 542
Food waste: a potential bioresource for extraction of nutraceuticals and bioactive compounds
Kumar, K., Yadav, A. N., Kumar, V., Vyas, P., & Dhaliwal, H. S. (2017) · Bioresources and Bioprocessing · doi:10.1186/s40643-017-0148-6 · Cited by 481
Gómez-Mejía, E., Rosales-Conrado, N., León-González, M. E., & Madrid, Y. (2019) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.136 · Cited by 282
Rifna, E. J., Misra, N. N., & Dwivedi, M. (2023) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2021.1952923 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Safdar, M. N., Kausar, T., Jabbar, S., Mumtaz, A., Ahad, K., & Saddozai, A. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Food and Drug Analysis
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 488-500
- ISSN
- 1021-9498 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2547958380
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extraction and quantification of polyphenols from kinnow ( Citrus reticulate L.) peel using ultrasound and maceration techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jfda.2016.07.010
- The paper
- Safdar, M. N., Kausar, T., Jabbar, S., Mumtaz, A., Ahad, K., & Saddozai, A. A. (2017). Extraction and quantification of polyphenols from kinnow ( Citrus reticulate L.) peel using ultrasound and maceration techniques. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2016.07.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.