CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vitro evaluation of physiological probiotic properties of different lactic acid bacteria strains of dairy and human origin

Monteagudo-Mera, Andrea, Rodríguez-Aparicio, Leandro, Rúa, Javier, Martínez-Blanco, Honorina, Navasa, Nicolás, García-Armesto, María Rosario, Ferrero, Miguel Ángel·2012·Journal of Functional Foods
DOI 10.1016/j.jff.2012.02.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jff.2012.02.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Aslim, 2006, Some probiotic properties of vaginal lactobacilli isolated from healthy women, Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 59, 249, 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2006.249 · DOI
  2. Bernet-Camard, 1997, The human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LA1 secretes a non-bacteriocin antibacterial substance(s) active in vitro and in vivo, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63, 2747, 10.1128/AEM.63.7.2747-2753.1997 · DOI
  3. Charteris, 2001, Gradient diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing of potentially probiotic lactobacilli, Journal of Food Protection, 64, 2007, 10.4315/0362-028X-64.12.2007 · DOI
  4. Coppola, 2005, Antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains isolated from Parmiggiano Reggiano cheese, Lait, 85, 193, 10.1051/lait:2005007 · DOI
  5. Danielsen, 2003, Susceptibility of Lactobacillus spp. to antimicrobial agents, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 82, 1, 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00254-4 · DOI
  6. Delgado, 2007, Substractive screening for probiotic properties of Lactobacillus species from the human gastrointestinal tract in the search for new probiotics, Journal of Food Science, 72, M310, 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00479.x · DOI
  7. Dunne, 2001, In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73, 386S, 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.386s · DOI · Paper page
  8. Elo, 1991, Attachment of Lactobacillus casei strain GG to human colon carcinoma cell line Caco-2: comparison with other dairy strains, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 13, 154, 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1991.tb00595.x · DOI
  9. EFSA, 2008, Technical guidance. Update of the criteria used in the assessment of bacterial resistance to antibiotics of human or veterinary importance, EFSA Journal, 732, 1
  10. Forestier, 2001, Probiotic activities of Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus: in vitro adherence to intestinal cells and antimicrobial properties, Research in Microbiology, 152, 167, 10.1016/S0923-2508(01)01188-3 · DOI
  11. Foulquié-Moreno, 2006, The role and application of enterococci in food and health, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 106, 1, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.06.026 · DOI
  12. Gasser, F. (1994). Safety of lactic acid bacteria and their occurrence in human clinical infections. Bulletin de l´Institut Pasteur, 92, 45–67.
  13. Guglielmotti, 2007, Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus delbrueckii strains and their phage resistant mutants, International Dairy Journal, 17, 916, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2006.11.004 · DOI
  14. Holzapel, 1998, Overview of gut flora and probiotics, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 41, 85, 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00044-0 · DOI
  15. Katla, 2001, Antimicrobial susceptibility of starter culture bacteria in Norwegian dairy products, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 67, 147, 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00522-5 · DOI
  16. Kimoto, 2007, Lactococcus sp. as potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria, Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 41, 181, 10.6090/jarq.41.181 · DOI
  17. Klaenhammer, 1999, Selection and design of probiotics, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 50, 45, 10.1016/S0168-1605(99)00076-8 · DOI
  18. Lehto, 1997, Adhesion of two Lactobacillus strains, one Lactococcus and one Propionibacterium strain to cultured human intestinal caco-2 cell line, Bioscience and Microflora, 16, 13, 10.12938/bifidus1996.16.13 · DOI
  19. Lim, 2008, Screening and characterization of probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from Korean fermented foods, Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 19, 178, 10.4014/jmb.0804.269 · DOI
  20. Mastromarino, 2009, Effectiveness of Lactobacillus-containing vaginal tablets in the treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 15, 67, 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02112.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Monteagudo-Mera, 2011, Characterization of certain bacterial strains for potential use as starter/probiotic cultures in dairy Products, Journal of Food Protection, 74, 1379, 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-392 · DOI
  22. Norin, 1994, Establishment of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in germ-free mice and their influence on some microflora-associated characteristics, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 57, 1850, 10.1128/AEM.57.6.1850-1852.1991 · DOI
  23. Ouwehand, 2002, Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 82, 279, 10.1023/A:1020620607611 · DOI
  24. Pennacchia, 2006, Potential probiotic Lactobacillus strains from fermented sausages: Further investigations on their probiotic properties, Meat Science, 73, 90, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.10.019 · DOI
  25. Ruseler-van Embden, 1995, Inability of Lactobacillus casei strain GG, L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum to degrade intestinal mucus glycoproteins, Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 30, 675, 10.3109/00365529509096312 · DOI
  26. Saarela, 2000, Probiotic bacteria: Safety, functional and technological properties, Journal of Biotechnology, 83, 197, 10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00375-8 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Schillinger, 1989, Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 55, 1901, 10.1128/AEM.55.8.1901-1906.1989 · DOI
  28. Servin, 2004, Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens, FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 28, 405, 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.01.003 · DOI
  29. Tuomola, 1998, Adhesion of some probiotic and dairy Lactobacillus strains to Caco-2 cell cultures, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 41, 45, 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00033-6 · DOI
  30. Vercellotti, 1977, Breakdown of mucin and plant polysaccharides in the human colon, Canadian Journal of Biochemistry, 55, 1190, 10.1139/o77-178 · DOI
  31. Verdenelli, 2009, Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus paracasei isolated from human feces, European Journal of Nutrition, 48, 355, 10.1007/s00394-009-0021-2 · DOI
  32. Villegas, 1998, Hydrogen peroxide production by Lactobacillus delbruekii subsp lactis at 5°C, Journal of Food Science, 63, 1070, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1998.tb15857.x · DOI
  33. Vinderola, 2008, Dried cell-free fraction of fermented milks: new functional additives for the food industry, Trends in Food Science and Technology, 19, 40, 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.07.003 · DOI
  34. Vizoso-Pinto, 2006, Lactobacillus spp. with in vitro probiotic properties from human feces and traditional fermented products, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 109, 205, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.01.029 · DOI
  35. Zarate, 2000, Viability and beta-galactosidase activity of dairy propionibacteria subjected to digestion by artificial gastric and intestinal fluids, Journal of Food Protection, 63, 1214, 10.4315/0362-028X-63.9.1214 · DOI
  36. Zhou, 2001, Potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus rhamnosus (HN001), Lactobacillus acidophilus (HN017) and Bifidobacterium lactis (HN019) do not degrade gastric mucin in vitro, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 63, 81, 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00398-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Monteagudo-Mera, A., Rodríguez-Aparicio, L., Rúa, J., Martínez-Blanco, H., Navasa, N., García-Armesto, M. R., & Ferrero, M. Á.
Venue
Journal of Functional Foods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
531-541
ISSN
1756-4646
DOI
10.1016/j.jff.2012.02.014
Cited by
177
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review