Cited by 311Stuttering Research and TreatmentVoice and Speech DisordersLanguage Development and Disorders

Life Experiences of People Who Stutter, and the Perceived Impact of Stuttering on Quality of Life: Personal Accounts of South African Individuals

Klompas, Michelle, Ross, Eleanor·2004·Journal of Fluency Disorders

Abstract

Unlabelled The purpose of the study was to investigate the life experiences of a group of South African adults who stutter and the impact of stuttering on their quality of life. Participants were 16 adults with a mean age of 28.9 and ranging from 20 to 59 years. Methods involved individual interviews designed to explore the life domains of education; social life; employment; speech therapy; family and marital life; and identity, beliefs and emotional issues. Main findings of the study indicated that the majority of participants perceived their stuttering to have impacted on their academic performance at school, and relationships with teachers and classmates. Although their stuttering was not perceived to adversely influence their ability to establish friendships, people generally reacted negatively to their stuttering. Many felt that their stuttering did not have an adverse effect on their choice of occupation, ability to obtain work, and relationships with managers and co-workers, although it was perceived to influence their work performance and hamper their chances for promotion. Although the majority viewed their speech therapy experiences as being negative; more than half the sample believed that speech therapy had, nevertheless exerted a positive effect on their quality of life. Overall, stuttering did not appear to have influenced participants' family and marital life. Most participants felt that stuttering had affected their self-esteem and self-image, and had evoked strong emotions within them. Findings are taken to suggest the need to incorporate subjective feelings about stuttering into the clinical practice of speech-language therapy; to provide information and coping strategies for teachers and employers; and for further research.Educational objectives After completing this activity, the reader will be able to: (1) describe and explain the perceived impact of stuttering on quality of life in terms of education; social life; employment; speech therapy; family and marital life; and identity, beliefs and emotional issues; (2) to interpret and utilize the subjective meanings that individuals attach to their stuttering to improve stuttering treatment, counseling and research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.10.001

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klompas, M., & Ross, E.
Affiliations
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Ross, Eleanor
Venue
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
275-305
ISSN
0094-730X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024880926
Cited by
311
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Fluency Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
stuttering, quality of life, life experience, adults who stutter, speech therapy outcomes, employment, academic performance, self-esteem, interpersonal relationships, identity, emotional impact, South Africa
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude to Health, Employment, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Social Adjustment, South Africa, Speech-Language Pathology, Speech Therapy, Stereotyping, Stuttering, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review