Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 646

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental fate, toxicity and risk management strategies of nanoplastics in the environment: Current status and future perspectives

Open access
Wang, Liuwei, Wu, Wei-Min, Bolan, Nanthi S., Tsang, Daniel C.W., Li, Yang, Qin, Muhan, Hou, Deyi·2021·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123415

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 646

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., Wu, W.-M., Bolan, N. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Li, Y., Qin, M., & Hou, D.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
401
Pages
123415
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3041663114
Cited by
646
References
37
FWCI
18.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental fate, toxicity and risk management strategies of nanoplastics in the environment: Current status and future perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123415
The paper
Wang, L., Wu, W.-M., Bolan, N. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Li, Y., Qin, M., & Hou, D. (2021). Environmental fate, toxicity and risk management strategies of nanoplastics in the environment: Current status and future perspectives. Journal of Hazardous Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123415

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.