Cited by 109Microplastics and Plastic PollutionPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsAnalytical chemistry methods development

Assessing microplastic characteristics in bottled drinking water and air deposition samples using laser direct infrared imaging

Open access
Nizamali, Jenny, Mintenig, Svenja M., Koelmans, Albert A.·2023·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

There is an urgent need for data on microplastics (MPs) in uptake media relevant to humans. Here we apply Laser Direct Infra-Red (LDIR) spectroscopy for the rapid analysis of MP> 10 µm in clean matrices such as bottled drinking water and (deposited) air samples, using strict QA/QC criteria. Nine water bottles of three different brands were found to contain on average 96 particles/L (range 7–364, median 44 particles/L) with polymer abundances in the order polyethylene terephthalate and/or polyurethane > polyamide > polyvinylchloride. Further, for laboratory and household rooms, MP deposition rates were measured, ranging from 0 to 573 particles m−2 h−1. For household deposition samples, these rates translate to 7 MP (range 0–16) consumed in an average meal. Polyethylene terephthalate and/or polyurethane > polyamide > polypropylene were the most abundant polymers. We find a statistically significant positive relationship between the total surface area of textile per unit of room volume (m2/m3) and the deposition of MP. Power law distributions for particle width, height, area, volume and mass were constructed for both sample types, with slopes ranging from 1.9 to 3.8. LDIR appears to be a relatively fast MP measurement method, with MP recovery during sample preparation as a potential improvement point.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129942

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nizamali, J., Mintenig, S. M., & Koelmans, A. A.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Koelmans, Albert A.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
441
Pages
129942
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4294945974
Cited by
109
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
Keywords
microplastics, bottled water, atmospheric deposition, particle size distribution, power-law distribution, polyethylene terephthalate, polyurethane, textile fibers, human dietary intake

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review