The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockchain-based electronic healthcare record system for healthcare 4.0 applications
Abstract
Abstract Modern healthcare systems are characterized as being highly complex and costly. However, this can be reduced through improved health record management, utilization of insurance agencies, and blockchain technology. Blockchain was first introduced to provide distributed records of money-related exchanges that were not dependent on centralized authorities or financial institutions. Breakthroughs in blockchain technology have led to improved transactions involving medical records, insurance billing, and smart contracts, enabling permanent access to and security of data, as well as providing a distributed database of transactions. One significant advantage of using blockchain technology in the healthcare industry is that it can reform the interoperability of healthcare databases, providing increased access to patient medical records, device tracking, prescription databases, and hospital assets, including the complete life cycle of a device within the blockchain infrastructure. Access to patients’ medical histories is essential to correctly prescribe medication, with blockchain being able to dramatically enhance the healthcare services framework. In this paper, several solutions for improving current limitations in healthcare systems using blockchain technology are explored, including frameworks and tools to measure the performance of such systems, e.g., Hyperledger Fabric, Composer, Docker Container, Hyperledger Caliper, and the Wireshark capture engine. Further, this paper proposes an Access Control Policy Algorithm for improving data accessibility between healthcare providers, assisting in the simulation of environments to implement the Hyperledger-based eletronic healthcare record (EHR) sharing system that uses the concept of a chaincode. Performance metrics in blockchain networks, such as latency, throughput, Round Trip Time (RTT). have also been optimized for achieving enhanced results. Compared to traditional EHR systems, which use client-server architecture, the proposed system uses blockchain for improving efficiency and security.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yue, X., Wang, H., Jin, D., Li, M., & Jiang, W. (2016) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0574-6 · Cited by 1,240
Integrating blockchain for data sharing and collaboration in mobile healthcare applications
Liang, X., Zhao, J., Shetty, S., Liu, J., & Li, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2017.8292361 · Cited by 711
Performance Benchmarking and Optimizing Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain Platform
Thakkar, P., Nathan, S., & Viswanathan, B. (2018) · 2018 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS) · doi:10.1109/mascots.2018.00034 · Cited by 632
Blockchain based searchable encryption for electronic health record sharing
Chen, L., Lee, W.-K., Chang, C.-C., Choo, K.-K. R., & Zhang, N. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.01.018 · Cited by 484
Blockchain-based data preservation system for medical data
Li, H., Zhu, L., Shen, M., Gao, F., Tao, X., & Liu, S. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-0997-3 · Cited by 347
Cited by
Medical 4.0 technologies for healthcare: Features, capabilities, and applications
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Pratap Singh, R., & Suman, R. (2022) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2022.04.001 · Cited by 468
An exhaustive survey on security and privacy issues in Healthcare 4.0
Hathaliya, J. J., & Tanwar, S. (2020) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2020.02.018 · Cited by 462
Self-citationThe benefits and threats of blockchain technology in healthcare: A scoping review
Abu-elezz, I., Hassan, A., Nazeemudeen, A., Househ, M., & Abd-alrazaq, A. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104246 · Cited by 375
A survey on the adoption of blockchain in IoT: challenges and solutions
Uddin, M. A., Stranieri, A., Gondal, I., & Balasubramanian, V. (2021) · Blockchain: Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.bcra.2021.100006 · Cited by 365
Bhushan, B., Khamparia, A., Sagayam, K. M., Sharma, S. K., Ahad, M. A., & Debnath, N. C. (2020) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102360 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanwar, S., Parekh, K., & Evans, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Information Security and Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 102407
- ISSN
- 2214-2126 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2990181228
- Cited by
- 944
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 142.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockchain-based electronic healthcare record system for healthcare 4.0 applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jisa.2019.102407
- The paper
- Tanwar, S., Parekh, K., & Evans, R. (2020). Blockchain-based electronic healthcare record system for healthcare 4.0 applications. Journal of Information Security and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2019.102407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
