Cited by 169Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

Structural basis of epitope recognition by heavy-chain camelid antibodies

Zavrtanik, Uroš, Lukan, Junoš, Loris, Remy, Lah, Jurij, Hadži, San·2018·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

Truncated versions of heavy-chain antibodies (HCAbs) from camelids, also termed nanobodies, comprise only one-tenth the mass of conventional antibodies, yet retain similar, high binding affinities for the antigens. Here we analyze a large data set of nanobody-antigen crystal structures and investigate how nanobody-antigen recognition compares to the one by conventional antibodies. We find that nanobody paratopes are enriched in aromatic residues just like conventional antibodies, but additionally, they also bear a more hydrophobic character. Most striking differences were observed in the characteristics of the antigen's epitope. Unlike conventional antibodies, nanobodies bind to more rigid, concave, conserved and structured epitopes enriched with aromatic residues. Nanobodies establish fewer interactions with the antigens compared to conventional antibodies, and we speculate that high binding affinities are achieved due to less unfavorable conformational and more favorable solvation entropy contributions. We observed that interactions with antigen are mediated not only by three CDR loops but also by numerous residues from the nanobody framework. These residues are not distributed uniformly; rather, they are concentrated into four structurally distinct regions and mediate mostly charged interactions. Our findings suggest that in some respects nanobody-antigen interactions are more similar to the general protein-protein interactions rather than antibody-antigen interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.09.002

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extended CDR3 loop of nanobodies has the capacity to form a finger-like structure with greater structural flexibility, likely fixed in one single conformation upon antigen-binding.

    “The extended CDR3 loop of nanobodies has the capacity to form a finger-like structure with greater structural flexibility which, in turn, is likely fixed in one single conformation upon antigen-binding [14,15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zavrtanik, U., Lukan, J., Loris, R., Lah, J., & Hadži, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
  • Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia (SI)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Hadži, San
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
430
Issue
21
Pages
4369-4386
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891129333
Cited by
169
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Slovenian Research Agency (P1-0201)
  • Onderzoeksraad of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (SPR13)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
nanobodies, heavy-chain antibodies, camelid antibodies, epitope recognition, antibody binding sites, aromatic residues, hydrophobic interactions, CDR loops, binding affinity, solvation entropy, protein-protein interaction, crystal structure
MeSH terms
Camelidae, Animals, Epitopes, Binding Sites, Binding Sites, Antibody, Camelids, New World, Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Crystallography, X-Ray, Single-Domain Antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review