Cited by 595Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Protein–protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces

Open access
Ma, Buyong, Elkayam, Tal, Wolfson, Haim, Nussinov, Ruth·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Polar residue hot spots have been observed at protein–protein binding sites. Here we show that hot spots occur predominantly at the interfaces of macromolecular complexes, distinguishing binding sites from the remainder of the surface. Consequently, hot spots can be used to define binding epitopes. We further show a correspondence between energy hot spots and structurally conserved residues. The number of structurally conserved residues, particularly of high ranking energy hot spots, increases with the binding site contact size. This finding may suggest that effectively dispersing hot spots within a large contact area, rather than compactly clustering them, may be a strategy to sustain essential key interactions while still allowing certain protein flexibility at the interface. Thus, most conserved polar residues at the binding interfaces confer rigidity to minimize the entropic cost on binding, whereas surrounding residues form a flexible cushion. Furthermore, our finding that similar residue hot spots occur across different protein families suggests that affinity and specificity are not necessarily coupled: higher affinity does not directly imply greater specificity. Conservation of Trp on the protein surface indicates a highly likely binding site. To a lesser extent, conservation of Phe and Met also imply a binding site. For all three residues, there is a significant conservation in binding sites, whereas there is no conservation on the exposed surface. A hybrid strategy, mapping sequence alignment onto a single structure illustrates the possibility of binding site identification around these three residues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1030237100

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [13]Norel R, Petrey D, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Proteins. 1999;36:307–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [20]Massova I, Kollman P A. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:8133–8143. [Google Scholar]
  3. [24]Hu Z, Ma B, Wolfson W, Nussinov R. Proteins. 2000;39:331–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [27]Valdar W S J, Thornton J M. Proteins. 1991;42:108–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [33]Chotia C. J Mol Biol. 1975;105:1–14. [Google Scholar]
  6. [34]Shatsky M, Nussinov R, Wolfson H. Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Lecture Notes In Computer Science. Vol. 2452. Berlin: Springer; 2002. pp. 235–250. [Google Scholar]
  7. [38]Samanta U, Pal D, Chakrabarti P. Proteins. 2000;38:288–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, B., Elkayam, T., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-05
Volume
100
Issue
10
Pages
5772-5777
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2160690759
Cited by
595
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 40
FWCI
13.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01co12400-79-0-22)
  • National Cancer Institute (N01CO12400, N01-CO-012400)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, binding sites, binding epitope, tryptophan, phenylalanine, methionine, protein flexibility, binding site identification
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Epitopes, Binding Sites, Molecular Sequence Data, Proteins, Tryptophan, Sequence Alignment, Conserved Sequence, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review