The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19 · Cited by 3,538 · cited 1×
“There is also evidence that such categorization could yield misleading results, either by decreasing statistical power and reliability (Cohen, 1983) or by inflating the Type II error rate ( MacCallum, Zhang, Preacher, & Rucker, 2002 ).”
BackgroundUnderstanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56 · Cited by 2,698
Cohen, J. (1983) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168300700301 · Cited by 1,564 · cited 2×
“Regression interactions were tested using the technique advocated by Cohen, Cohen, West, and Aiken (2003). Specifically, the variables of interest (and other control variables) were first entered in the regression model, followed by the interaction term in the following step, and the R-square change between the two re…”
BackgroundMethodThe organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.
Glushko, R. J. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.5.4.674 · Cited by 961
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.273 · Cited by 748
The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography.
Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.107 · Cited by 556
The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts
Andrews, S. (1997) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03214334 · Cited by 535
Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?
Andrews, S. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802 · Cited by 468
Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency
Weekes, B. S. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A · doi:10.1080/027249897392170 · Cited by 354
Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model.
Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1131 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001 · Cited by 413
Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas
Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., McCormick, S. F., & Keuleers, E. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9 · Cited by 207
The connectionist dual process (CDP) approach to modelling reading aloud
Zorzi, M. (2010) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440903435621 · Cited by 55
Using the speeded word fragment completion task to examine semantic priming
Heyman, T., De Deyne, S., Hutchison, K. A., & Storms, G. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0496-5 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 502-529
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096683984
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 31.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.001
- The paper
- Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
