The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 · Cited by 8,540
Self-citationOn the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19 · Cited by 3,538 · cited 1×
“Very similar results are obtained when the orthographic rating is dichotomized into high (>2) and low ( =2), although in general dichotomization is not advisable (see, e.g., Cohen, 1983, MacCallum et al., 2002).”
ResultKroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 · Cited by 2,656 · cited 3×
“In the theoretical framework of the Revised Hierarchical Model (Kroll & Stewart, 1994, pp. 162-166), the link would be associative in nature and therefore its strength would depend on the word frequency of the items involved.”
BackgroundThe architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision
Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728902003012 · Cited by 1,730
Self-citationCohen, J. (1983) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168300700301 · Cited by 1,564 · cited 1×
“Very similar results are obtained when the orthographic rating is dichotomized into high (>2) and low ( =2), although in general dichotomization is not advisable (see, e.g., Cohen, 1983, MacCallum et al., 2002).”
ResultA ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading
van Orden, G. C. (1987) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197716 · Cited by 867
Cited by
Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0 · Cited by 1,338
Multilink: a computational model for bilingual word recognition and word translation
DIJKSTRA, T., WAHL, A., BUYTENHUIJS, F., VAN HALEM, N., AL-JIBOURI, Z., DE KORTE, M., & REKKÉ, S. (2019) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728918000287 · Cited by 379
Self-citationElgort, I., & Warren, P. (2014) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12052 · Cited by 240
Using the peabody picture vocabulary test in L2 children and adolescents: effects of L1
Goriot, C., van Hout, R., Broersma, M., Lobo, V., McQueen, J. M., & Unsworth, S. (2021) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2018.1494131 · Cited by 61
Ayyoub, A., Khlaif, Z., Hamamra, B., Bensalem, E., Mitwally, M., Sanmugam, M., Fteiha, A., Joma, A., Bsharat, T. R. K., Eidah, B. A., et al. (2025) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/6265087 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Dijkstra, T., Miwa, K., Brummelhuis, B., Sappelli, M., & Baayen, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 284-301
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037961671
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.003
- The paper
- Dijkstra, T., Miwa, K., Brummelhuis, B., Sappelli, M., & Baayen, H. (2010). How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
