Cited by 350Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningSmart Cities and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 237 of the 244 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blockchain for smart communities: Applications, challenges and opportunities

Open access

Abstract

Abstract Since the success of Bitcoin, there have been increased focus of studying the application of blockchain in a broad range of applications, such as in solutions facilitating identity privacy and transaction security using a decentralized architecture via different consensus mechanisms (e.g. proof-of-work) between different geo-located IoT devices/nodes in our increasingly digitalized society (e.g. smart city). In this paper, we survey the usage of blockchain technology for smart communities, focusing on key components of the blockchain applications. We also study the various process models used in the execution of secure transactions. Specifically, we present a detailed taxonomy on the applications, process models used, and communication infrastructure support needed to execute various applications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jnca.2019.06.018

Cites

237 of 237 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 244 references

7 of the 244 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Peck, 2017, Energy trading for fun and profit buy your neighbor's rooftop solar power or sell your own-itll all be on a blockchain, IEEE Spectrum, 54, 56, 10.1109/MSPEC.2017.8048842 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–350 of 350

Metadata

Authors
Aggarwal, S., Chaudhary, R., Aujla, G. S., Kumar, N., Choo, K.-K. R., & Zomaya, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology (IN)
  • Chandigarh University (IN)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond
Venue
Journal of Network and Computer Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
144
Pages
13-48
ISSN
1084-8045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2955591483
Cited by
344
References
244
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 5
FWCI
66.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Network and Computer Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
blockchain, smart communities, smart cities, Internet of Things, identity privacy, transaction security, decentralized architecture, consensus algorithms, proof-of-work, secure transactions, process model, communication infrastructure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review