Cited by 87Digital Mental Health InterventionsBehavioral Health and InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Turning good intentions into actions by using the health action process approach to predict adherence to internet-based depression prevention: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Open access
Zarski, Anna-Carlotta, Berking, Matthias, Reis, Dorota, Lehr, Dirk, Buntrock, Claudia, Schwarzer, Ralf, Ebert, David Daniel·2018·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many individuals engaging in Internet-based interventions fail to complete these treatments as intended. The processes responsible for treatment adherence in Internet-based interventions are still poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent adherence in an Internet-based intervention can be predicted by motivational and volitional factors outlined in the health action process approach (HAPA). METHODS: This study investigated motivational and volitional factors included in HAPA in a randomized controlled trial to predict treatment adherence of N=101 individuals with subclinical depression in the intervention group of a depression prevention intervention (GET.ON Mood Enhancer). Adherence was operationalized as the number of completed treatment modules. Using longitudinal structural equation modeling, HAPA variables (motivational, maintenance, and recovery self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, intention, and planning) were assessed at baseline and their associations with adherence 7 weeks later. RESULTS: Planning predicted adherence. Better planning was, in turn, associated with higher levels of maintenance self-efficacy, and the latter significantly affected treatment adherence via planning. The other hypothesized direct associations were not significant. In total, the HAPA variables accounted for 14% of variance in treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Planning emerged as the strongest predictor of treatment adherence in highly motivated participants in an Internet-based intervention out of all HAPA variables investigated. Findings are in line with the hypothesis that planning facilitates the translation of good intentions into actions. The findings imply that systematically fostering planning skills and maintenance self-efficacy prior to or during Internet-based interventions would help participants to successfully complete these treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005973; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do? navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00005973 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6uxCy64sy).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.8814

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [19]Schwarzer R Luszczynska A Connor P Health action process approach Predicting Health Behavior. 3rd Edition 2015 Maidenhead McGraw Hill Open University Press 252 278
  2. [40]Beck A Steer A Brown G BDI-II: Beck Depression Inventory Manual. 2nd edition 1996 San Antonio Psychological Corporation
  3. [55]Little T Cunningham W Shahar G Widaman K To parcel or not to parcel; exploring the question, weighing the merits Struct Equ Model 2002 9 2 173 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zarski, A.-C., Berking, M., Reis, D., Lehr, D., Buntrock, C., Schwarzer, R., & Ebert, D. D.
Affiliations
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
  • Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
Corresponding author
Zarski, Anna-Carlotta
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2018-01-11
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
e9
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2783942684
Cited by
87
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
20.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
medication adherence, Health Action Process Approach, online intervention, depression prevention, subthreshold depression, planning, outcome expectations, intention, motivational factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Motivation, Patient Compliance, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Behavior, Self Efficacy, Internet, Intention, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review