Cited by 43Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Plate waste of adults in the United States measured in free-living conditions

Open access
Roe, Brian E., Apolzan, John W., Qi, Danyi, Allen, H. Raymond, Martin, Corby K.·2018·PLoS ONE

Abstract

We analyze food-item level data collected from 50 adults from the United States using the Remote Food Photography Method® to provide the first estimates of plate waste gathered from adults across multiple consecutive meals and days in free-living conditions, and during laboratory-based meals with fixed food items and quantities. We find average plate waste in free-living conditions is 5.6 grams (7.7 kcals) per item and that 3.3% of all food selected is returned as plate waste, where the percent waste figure is substantially lower than previously published plate waste estimates gathered primarily from dine-out settings in the United States such as buffets and institutional settings with limited-choice meals (e.g., school cafeterias). Plate waste from the same participants during the laboratory-based meals is significantly higher with an average of 203.2 grams of solid plate waste per meal (531.3 kcals) or 39.1% of the food provided, which is similar to the plate waste percentages found reported in some school cafeteria settings. The amount of plate waste generated in free-living conditions is significantly positively associated with portion size selected for an item. In a multivariate analysis that controls for macronutrient profile, items selected from the vegetables, fats/oils/dressings, and grains categories are associated with significantly greater amounts of plate waste per item. We find no significant associations between free-living plate waste and gender, age, race or body mass index but find that women leave more plate waste in the lab meal where portion sizes are pre-determined by the researcher and similar for all respondents. We discuss possible implications of these findings for programs focused on reducing plate waste and food waste among consumers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0191813

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study found a positive relationship between the amount of food selected at each meal and the amount of plate waste.

    “In a recent study, researchers found a positive relationship between the amount of food selected at each meal and the amount of plate waste, suggesting a need to better align satiety levels with food portioning.[55]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]Buzby JC, Guthrie JF. Plate waste in school nutrition programs. The Journal of Consumer Affairs. 2002 3; 36(2): 220– 38.
  2. [25]Norton VP, Martin C. Plate waste of selected food items in a university dining hall. School food service research review (USA). 1991.
  3. [40]Williams P, Walton K. Plate waste in hospitals and strategies for change. e-SPEN, the European e- Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. 2011 12 31; 6(6): e235– 41.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roe, B. E., Apolzan, J. W., Qi, D., Allen, H. R., & Martin, C. K.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Roe, Brian E.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2018-02-14
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
e0191813
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792501229
Cited by
43
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R21 AG032231)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NORC Center Grant # P30DK072476)
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (20176702326268)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
plate waste, food waste, free-living conditions, portion size, food choice, gender differences, food waste reduction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Food Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review