Cited by 319Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circulating endotoxin and systemic immune activation in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (sALS)

Open access

Abstract

The present study reports elevated levels of endotoxin/lipopolysaccharide (LPS) concentrations in plasma from patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (sALS) and Alzheimer's (AD) as compared to healthy controls. Levels of plasma LPS showed a significant positive correlation with degree of blood monocyte/macrophage activation in disease groups and was most elevated in patients with advanced sALS disease. There was a significant negative relationship between plasma LPS and levels of monocyte/macrophage IL-10 expression in sALS blood. These data suggest that systemic LPS levels and activated monocyte/macrophages may play significant roles in the pathogenesis of sALS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.09.017

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, R., Miller, R. G., Gascon, R., Champion, S., Katz, J., Lancero, M., Narvaez, A., Honrada, R., Ruvalcaba, D., & McGrath, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • California Pacific Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
McGrath, Michael S.
Venue
Journal of Neuroimmunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
206
Issue
1-2
Pages
121-124
ISSN
0165-5728 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128492849
Cited by
319
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroimmunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA066529)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
sporadic ALS, endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide, systemic immune activation, monocyte/macrophage activation, IL-10, Alzheimer's disease, plasma biomarkers, neuroinflammation, disease progression
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Analysis of Variance, Endotoxins, Female, Flow Cytometry, HLA-DR Antigens, Humans, Lipopolysaccharides, Macrophages, Male, Middle Aged, Monocytes, Interleukin-10

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review