Cited by 51Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismMemory Processes and InfluencesLanguage Development and Disorders

The acquisition of a linguistic skill by adults: Procedural and declarative memory interact in the learning of an artificial morphological rule

Ferman, Sara, Olshtain, Elite, Schechtman, Edna, Karni, Avi·2009·Journal of Neurolinguistics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.12.002

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ferman, S., Olshtain, E., Schechtman, E., & Karni, A.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Ferman, Sara
Venue
Journal of Neurolinguistics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
384-412
ISSN
0911-6044 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093101913
Cited by
51
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Neurolinguistics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
adult second language acquisition, procedural memory, declarative memory, explicit knowledge, proceduralization, skill consolidation, retention, generalization, power law of practice, fluency, phonological transformation, semantic aspect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review