Cited by 47Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchSports injuries and preventionTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Evaluation of the King-Devick test as a concussion screening tool in high school football players

Seidman, Daniel H., Burlingame, Jennifer, Yousif, Lina R., Donahue, Xinh P., Krier, Joshua, Rayes, Lydia J., Young, Rachel, Lilla, Muareen +5 more·2015·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Objective Concussion is the most common type of traumatic brain injury, and results from impact or impulsive forces to the head, neck or face. Due to the variability and subtlety of symptoms, concussions may go unrecognized or be ignored, especially with the pressure placed on athletes to return to competition. The King-Devick (KD) test, an oculomotor test originally designed for reading evaluation, was recently validated as a concussion screening tool in collegiate athletes. A prospective study was performed using high school football players in an attempt to study the KD as a concussion screening tool in this younger population.Methods 343 athletes from four local high school football teams were recruited to participate. These athletes were given baseline KD tests prior to competition. Individual demographic information was collected on the subjects. Standard team protocol was employed to determine if a concussion had occurred during competition. Immediately after diagnosis, the KD test was re-administered to the concussed athlete for comparison to baseline. Post-season testing was also performed in non-concussed individuals.Results Of the 343 athletes, nine were diagnosed with concussions. In all concussed players, cumulative read times for the KD test were significantly increased (p<0.001). Post-season testing of non-concussed athletes revealed minimal change in read times relative to baseline. Univariate analysis revealed that history of concussion was the only demographic factor predictive of concussion in this cohort.Conclusion The KD test is an accurate and easily administered sideline screening tool for concussion in adolescent football players.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jns.2015.06.021

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seidman, D. H., Burlingame, J., Yousif, L. R., Donahue, X. P., Krier, J., Rayes, L. J., Young, R., Lilla, M., Mazurek, R., Hittle, K., McCloskey, C., Misra, S., & Shaw, M. K.
Affiliations
Ascension (US)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Michael K.
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
356
Issue
1-2
Pages
97-101
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1892059861
Cited by
47
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-11-15)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Executive Committee
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
King-Devick test, concussion, concussion screening, high school football, youth athletes, oculomotor function, baseline assessment, return to sport, traumatic brain injury
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain Concussion, Eye Movements, Follow-Up Studies, Football, Humans, Male, Neurologic Examination, Schools, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review