Cited by 302Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchSports injuries and preventionMartial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education

The King-Devick test as a determinant of head trauma and concussion in boxers and MMA fighters

Open access
Galetta, K.M., Barrett, J., Allen, M., Madda, F., Delicata, D., Tennant, A.T., Branas, C.C., Maguire, M.G. +4 more·2011·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sports-related concussion has received increasing attention as a cause of short- and long-term neurologic symptoms among athletes. The King-Devick (K-D) test is based on measurement of the speed of rapid number naming (reading aloud single-digit numbers from 3 test cards), and captures impairment of eye movements, attention, language, and other correlates of suboptimal brain function. We investigated the K-D test as a potential rapid sideline screening for concussion in a cohort of boxers and mixed martial arts fighters. METHODS: The K-D test was administered prefight and postfight. The Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) was administered as a more comprehensive but longer test for concussion. Differences in postfight K-D scores and changes in scores from prefight to postfight were compared for athletes with head trauma during the fight vs those without. RESULTS: Postfight K-D scores (n = 39 participants) were significantly higher (worse) for those with head trauma during the match (59.1 ± 7.4 vs 41.0 ± 6.7 seconds, p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Those with loss of consciousness showed the greatest worsening from prefight to postfight. Worse postfight K-D scores (r(s) = -0.79, p = 0.0001) and greater worsening of scores (r(s) = 0.90, p < 0.0001) correlated well with postfight MACE scores. Worsening of K-D scores by ≥5 seconds was a distinguishing characteristic noted only among participants with head trauma. High levels of test-retest reliability were observed (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97 [95% confidence interval 0.90-1.0]). CONCLUSIONS: The K-D test is an accurate and reliable method for identifying athletes with head trauma, and is a strong candidate rapid sideline screening test for concussion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821184c9

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gregory S, Bissinger B. The most dangerous game: how to fix football; the crisis in schools. Time 2010;175:36 -45.
  2. Dooren JC. Researchers see rise in children's sports-related concussions. Wall Street Journal 2010 Aug 30.
  3. Cantu RC, Herring SA, Putukian M. Concussion. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1787-1789. Letter.
  4. Hunt T, Asplund C. Concussion assessment and manage- ment. Clin Sports Med 2010;29:5-17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galetta, K. M., Barrett, J., Allen, M., Madda, F., Delicata, D., Tennant, A. T., Branas, C. C., Maguire, M. G., Messner, L. V., Devick, S., Galetta, S. L., & Balcer, L. J.
Affiliations
Illinois College of Optometry (US)
Corresponding author
Balcer, L.J.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2011-04-26
Volume
76
Issue
17
Pages
1456-1462
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1987764148
Cited by
302
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
Keywords
King-Devick test, sports-related concussion, head trauma, boxers, loss of consciousness, test-retest reliability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Boxing, Brain Concussion, Female, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Reading, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Trauma Severity Indices, Martial Arts, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review