CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 539

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: understanding the double agency role of the first-tier supplier

Wilhelm, Miriam M., Blome, Constantin, Bhakoo, Vikram, Paulraj, Antony·2016·Journal of Operations Management
DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In light of the growing complexity of globally dispersed, multi‐tier supply chains, the involvement of first‐tier suppliers has become instrumental in the quest for achieving sustainability compliance along the supply chain. We describe this new responsibility as the double agency role. We employ agency and institutional theory arguments to explore the conditions under which first‐tier suppliers will act as agents who fulfill the lead firm's sustainability requirements (i.e., the primary agency role) and implement these requirements in their suppliers' operations (i.e., the secondary agency role). The findings from three in‐depth case studies embedded in different institutional contexts highlight the importance for lead firms to incentivize each agency role separately and to reduce information asymmetries, particularly at the second‐tier level. In addition, our inductive analysis reveals several contingency factors that influence the coupling of the secondary agency role of the first‐tier supplier. These factors include resource availability at the first‐tier supplier's firm, the lead firm's focus on the triple‐bottom‐line dimension (i.e., environmental or social), the lead firm's use of power, and the lead firm's internal alignment of the sustainability and purchasing function. We integrate our findings in a conceptual framework that advances the research agenda on multi‐tier sustainable supply chains, and we subsequently outline the practical implications of assigning the double agency role to first tier suppliers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 10.5465/amj.2008.31767256 · DOI
  2. 10.1108/13598541211258573 · DOI
  3. 10.1108/SCM-04-2012-0152 · DOI
  4. Barratt M., 2007, Mandated RFID and institutional responses: cases of decentralized business units, Prod. Oper. Manag., 16, 569, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00281.x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.002 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.016 · DOI
  7. Boxenbaum E., 2008, Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling, Sage Handb. Organ. Inst., 78
  8. 10.1108/09600030810882816 · DOI
  9. 10.1108/17410390810888642 · DOI
  10. 10.1023/A:1026210608769 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00068-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00025-6 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.09.005 · DOI
  14. 10.5465/amj.2010.0697 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/256457 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/258191 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Elkington J., 1997, Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business
  19. 10.1108/13598541211258618 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/002224298404800305 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/smj.722 · DOI
  22. 10.1108/13598541211258591 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.011 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jom.2008.11.002 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jom.2014.01.005 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jom.2011.06.006 · DOI
  27. Jamali D., 2015, CSR institutionalized myths in developing countries: an imminent threat of selective decoupling, Bus. Soc.
  28. 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.005 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.010 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.021 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.008 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/3069293 · DOI
  35. 10.1108/13598540910942000 · DOI
  36. Lee H.L., 2012, Incentivizing sustainability in your Chinese supply chain, Eur. Bus. Rev., 27
  37. 10.1111/bjir.12003 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s10551-013-1796-x · DOI
  39. 10.5840/beq200717118 · DOI
  40. Maloni M., 2000, Power influences in the supply chain, J. Bus. Logist., 21, 49
  41. 10.1111/jscm.12003 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00023-0 · DOI
  43. 10.1086/226550 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Miles M.B., 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Source Book.
  45. 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03162.x · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.031 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03175.x · DOI
  48. 10.1108/01443570210427668 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Rv T., 2001, Multinationality and corporate ethics: codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry, J. Int. Bus. Stud., 32, 267, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490952 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.jom.2007.09.001 · DOI
  51. 10.5465/amj.2007.24160882 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Strauss A.L., 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
  53. 10.1108/SCM-02-2014-0070 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Wal S., 2011, Certified Unilever Tea: Small Cup, Big Difference?
  55. 10.2307/j.ctt6wrc8r · DOI
  56. 10.1108/00070701311289894 · DOI
  57. 10.5465/amr.2014.0464 · DOI
  58. 10.5465/amr.1998.192967 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/S1053-5357(01)00102-0 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.jom.2010.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/j.jom.2015.06.004 · DOI
  62. Yawar S.A., 2015, Management of social issues in supply chains: a literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes, J. Bus. Ethics
  63. Yin R.K., 2009, Case Study Research: Design and Methods
  64. 10.1007/s10551-007-9521-2 · DOI
  65. Zito M.J., 2014, A Complete Guide to Minimum Wage Levels across China 2014
  66. 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2003.tb00156.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wilhelm, M. M., Blome, C., Bhakoo, V., & Paulraj, A.
Venue
Journal of Operations Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-18
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
42-60
ISSN
  • 0272-6963
  • 1873-1317
DOI
10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.001
Cited by
539
References
4
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review