Cited by 29Gender Roles and Identity StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesSex and Gender in Healthcare

Sex-specific effects of gender identification on pain study recruitment

Open access
Mattos Feijó, Larissa, Tarman, Guliz Zeynep, Fontaine, Charlotte, Harrison, Richard, Johnstone, Tom, Salomons, Tim·2018·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory studies show sex differences in pain responses, with women more sensitive to nociceptive stimulation and more vulnerable to long-term pain conditions than men. Because of evidence that men are culturally reinforced for the ability to endure (or under-report) pain, some of these findings might be explained by sociocultural beliefs about gender-appropriate behavior. One potential manifestation of these effects might be differential participation in pain studies, with men adhering to stereotypical masculine roles viewing participation as a way to demonstrate their masculinity. To test this possibility, we assessed gender identification in 137 healthy participants. At the end of the assessment, they were asked if they would like to participate in other research studies. Interested participants were then asked to participate in a study involving administration of pain-evoking stimulation. We compared individuals who agreed to participate in the pain study with those who declined. We observed a significant Sex × Participation interaction in masculine gender identification, such that men (but not women) who agreed to participate identified significantly more with masculine gender. Among masculine gender traits examined, we found that high levels of aggression and competitiveness were the strongest predictors of pain study participation. Our results suggest that men in pain studies might have higher levels of masculine gender identification than the wider male population. Taken together with previous findings of lower levels of pain sensitivity (or reporting) in masculine-identifying male participants, these results suggest an explanation for some of the sex-related differences observed in pain responses.Perspective To examine whether sex and gender affect willingness to participate in pain studies, we assessed gender identification in men and women, then attempted to recruit them to participate in a pain study. Men who agree to participate in pain studies are significantly higher in masculine gender identification than men who decline to participate or women who agree to participate. Men who agreed to participate were rated particularly high in aggressiveness and competitiveness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.09.009

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Couples-based interventions for patients with painful cancers appear more efficacious than treatment as usual or exclusively patient-focused interventions.

    “couples- based interventions for patients with painful cancers appear to show greater efficacy than either treatment as usual or exclusively patient-focused interventions 102–104”
  • Patients whose partners have avoidant and anxious attachment styles are more likely to report greater pain and lower well-being.

    “Patients with partners showing avoidant and anxious attachment styles are more likely to report increased pain and decreased well-being 103, 124–127.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattos Feijó, L., Tarman, G. Z., Fontaine, C., Harrison, R., Johnstone, T., & Salomons, T.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
Salomons, Tim
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
178-185
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766069671
Cited by
29
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Keywords
sex differences in pain, gender identification, aggression, competitiveness, pain sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Competitive Behavior, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Characteristics, Patient Selection, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review