Cited by 86Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentNeurosurgical Procedures and Complications

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgery for Infantile Craniosynostosis: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Riordan, Coleman P., Zurakowski, David, Meier, Petra M., Alexopoulos, Georgios, Meara, John G., Proctor, Mark R., Goobie, Susan M.·2020·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To evaluate patient outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) for craniosynostosis.Study design This is a retrospective cohort analysis (2004-2018) of 500 consecutive infants with craniosynostosis treated by ESC with orthotic therapy at a single center. Operative outcomes included transfusions, complications, and reoperations as well as head circumference change based on World Health Organization percentiles. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with blood transfusion. Paired t tests were used for within-patient comparisons and Fisher exact test to compare syndromic and nonsyndromic subgroups.Results ESC was associated with low rates of blood transfusion (6.6%), complications (1.4%), and reoperations (3.0%). Risk factors for transfusion included syndromic craniosynostosis (P = .01) and multiple fused sutures (P = .02). Median surgical time was 47 minutes, and hospital length of stay 1 day. Transfusion and reoperation rates were higher among syndromic patients (both P < .001). Head circumference normalized by 12 months of age relative to World Health Organization criteria in infants with sagittal, coronal, and multisuture craniosynostosis (all P < .001).Conclusions ESC is a safe, effective, and durable correction of infantile craniosynostosis. ESC can achieve head growth normalization with low risks of blood transfusion, complications, or reoperation. Early identification of craniosynostosis in the newborn period and prompt referral by pediatricians allows families the option of ESC vs larger and riskier open reconstruction procedures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.09.037

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riordan, C. P., Zurakowski, D., Meier, P. M., Alexopoulos, G., Meara, J. G., Proctor, M. R., & Goobie, S. M.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Goobie, Susan M.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
216
Pages
142-149.e2
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984771983
Cited by
86
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • R. Michael Scott Research Endowment Fund
  • Ingraham Fund for Neurosurgical Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Keywords
endoscopic strip craniectomy, minimally invasive surgery, syndromic craniosynostosis, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, blood transfusion, postoperative complications, reoperation, head circumference, orthotic treatment, sagittal craniosynostosis, coronal craniosynostosis, risk factors
MeSH terms
Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review