Cited by 22

Neural mechanisms of expectancy-based placebo effects in antidepressant clinical trials

Zilcha-Mano, Sigal, Wang, Zhishun, Peterson, Bradley S., Wall, Melanie M., Chen, Ying, Wager, Tor D., Brown, Patrick J., Roose, Steven P. +1 more·2019·Journal of Psychiatric Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.023

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Amunts K, Kedo O, Kindler M, Pieperhoff P, Mohlberg H, Shah NJ, Habel U, Schneider F, Zilles K, 2005 Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps. Anat. Embryol. (Berl). 210, 343– 352. 16208455
  2. Ashar YK, Chang LJ, Wager TD, 2017 Brain mechanisms of the placebo effect: an affective appraisal account. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 13, 73– 98. 28375723
  3. American Psychiatric Association, 2000 Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (revised 4th ed.). Washington, DC Author.
  4. Chau LS, Davis AS, Galvez R, 2013 Neocortical synaptic proliferation following forebrain-dependent trace associative learning. Behav. Neurosci. 127, 285. 23398434
  5. Di X, Gohel S, Kim EH, Biswal BB (2013). Task vs. rest-different network configurations between the coactivation and the resting-state brain networks. Front Hum Neurosci 17, 493. PMC3775427 24062654
  6. Ekman P, 1976 Pictures of facial affect. Consult. Psychol. Press.
  7. Friston KJ, Penny W, 2003 Posterior probability maps and SPMs. Neuroimage 19, 1240– 1249. 12880849
  8. Fu CHY, Williams SCR, Cleare AJ, Brammer MJ, Walsh ND, Kim J, Andrew CM, Pich EM, Williams PM, Reed LJ, 2004 Attenuation of the neural response to sad faces in major depressionby antidepressant treatment: a prospective, event-related functional magnetic resonance imagingstudy. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 61, 877– 889. 15351766
  9. Galvez R, Weiss C, Weible AP, Disterhoft JF, 2006 Vibrissa-signaled eyeblink conditioning induces somatosensory cortical plasticity. J. Neurosci. 26, 6062– 6068. 16738249 PMC6675235
  10. Hamilton JP, Etkin A, Furman DJ, Lemus MG, Johnson RF, Gotlib IH, 2012 Functional neuroimaging of major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis and new integration of baseline activation and neural response data. Am. J. Psychiatry 169, 693– 703. 22535198 PMC11889638
  11. Hunter AM, Leuchter AF, Morgan ML, Cook IA, 2006 Changes in brain function (quantitative EEG cordance) during placebo lead-in and treatment outcomes in clinical trials for major depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 163, 1426– 1432. 16877657
  12. Kang L, Zhang A, Sun N, Liu P, Yang C, Li G, Liu Z, Wang Y, Zhang K, 2018 Functional connectivity between the thalamus and the primary somatosensory cortex in major depressive disorder: a resting-state fMRI study. BMC Psychiatry 18, 339. 30340472 PMC6194586
  13. Mayberg HS, Silva JA, Brannan SK, Tekell JL, Mahurin RK, McGinnis S, Jerabek PA, 2002 The functional neuroanatomy of the placebo effect. Am. J. Psychiatry 159, 728– 737. 11986125
  14. O’Doherty JP, Deichmann R, Critchley HD, Dolan RJ, 2002 Neural responses during anticipation of a primary taste reward. Neuron 33, 815– 826. 11879657
  15. Papakostas GI, Fava M, 2009 Does the probability of receiving placebo influence clinical trial outcome? A meta-regression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials in MDD. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 19, 34– 40. 18823760
  16. Peciña M, Bohnert ASB, Sikora M, Avery ET, Langenecker SA, Mickey BJ, Zubieta J-K, 2015 Association between placebo-activated neural systems and antidepressant responses: neurochemistry of placebo effects in major depression. JAMA psychiatry 72, 1087– 1094. 26421634 PMC4758856
  17. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF, 2004 SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput, 36(4), 717– 731. 15641418
  18. Ronchetti E, 1990 Small sample asymptotics: A review with applications to robust statistics. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 10, 207– 223.
  19. Rutherford BR, Roose SP, 2013 A model of placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials. Am. J. Psychiatry 170, 723– 733. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12040474 23318413 PMC3628961 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Rutherford BR, Sneed JR, Roose SP, 2009 Does study design influence outcome? Psychother. Psychosom. 78, 172– 181. 19321970 PMC3785090
  21. Rutherford BR, Wall MM, Brown PJ, Choo TH, Wager TD, Peterson BS, Chung S, Kirsch I, Roose SP, 2017 Patient expectancy as a mediator of placebo effects in antidepressant clinical trials. Am. J. Psychiatry 174, 135– 142. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16020225 27609242 PMC5288269 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Sheline YI, Barch DM, Donnelly JM, Ollinger JM, Snyder AZ, Mintun MA, 2001 Increased amygdala response to masked emotional faces in depressed subjects resolves with antidepressant treatment: an fMRI study. Biol. Psychiatry 50, 651– 658. 11704071
  23. Sinyor M, Levitt AJ, Cheung AH, Schaffer A, Kiss A, Dowlati Y, Lanctot KL, 2010 Does inclusion of a placebo arm influence response to active antidepressant treatment in randomized controlled trials? Results from pooled and meta-analyses. 20122371
  24. Sneed JR, Rutherford BR, Rindskopf D, Lane DT, Sackeim HA, Roose SP, 2008 Design makes a difference: a meta-analysis of antidepressant response rates in placebo- controlled versus comparator trials in late-life depression. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 16, 65– 73. 17998306
  25. Surguladze S, Brammer MJ, Keedwell P, Giampietro V, Young AW, Travis MJ, Williams SCR, Phillips ML, 2005 A differential pattern of neural response toward sad versus happy facial expressions in major depressive disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 57, 201– 209. 15691520
  26. Wager TD, Rilling JK, Smith EE, Sokolik A, Casey KL, Davidson RJ, Kosslyn SM, Rose RM, Cohen JD, 2004 Placebo-induced changes in FMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain. Science (80-.). 303, 1162– 1167. 14976306
  27. Wilcox RR, 2011 Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. Academic press.
  28. Williams LM, Gordon E, 2007 Dynamic organization of the emotional brain: responsivity, stability, and instability. Neurosci. 13, 349– 370. 17644766
  29. Williams LM, Korgaonkar MS, Song YC, Paton R, Eagles S, Goldstein-Piekarski A, Grieve SM, Harris AWF, Usherwood T, Etkin A, 2015 Amygdala reactivity to emotional faces in the prediction of general and medication-specific responses to antidepressant treatment in the randomized iSPOT-D trial. Neuropsychopharmacology 40, 2398. 25824424 PMC4538354
  30. Zu J, Yuan K-H, 2010 Local influence and robust procedures for mediation analysis. Multivariate Behav. Res. 45, 1– 44. 26789083

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zilcha-Mano, S., Wang, Z., Peterson, B. S., Wall, M. M., Chen, Y., Wager, T. D., Brown, P. J., Roose, S. P., & Rutherford, B. R.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
116
Pages
19-25
ISSN
0022-3956
Cited by
22
References
10
Language
en
Funders
  • NIMH (K23 MH08523)
  • The U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) (2017263)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review