CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 330Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiac Health and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of depression and anxiety in onset of diabetes in a large population-based study

Engum, Anne·2007·Journal of Psychosomatic Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.07.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective Recent research has shown that depression may predict incident diabetes. The aims of the study are to investigate if symptoms of depression and anxiety precede the onset of diabetes or vice versa and to examine if mediating factors may explain such associations. Methods A prospective population-based study (N=37,291) investigating the associations between symptoms of depression/anxiety and diabetes was conducted. Results Individuals reporting symptoms of depression and anxiety at baseline had increased risk of onset of type 2 diabetes at 10-year follow-up. No gender differences were found. The analyses did not reveal underlying factors that mediated the association. Baseline diagnosis of diabetes was not associated with subsequent symptoms of anxiety or depression among males or females. Conclusion Diabetes did not predict symptoms of depression or anxiety. Symptoms of depression and anxiety emerged as significant risk factors for onset of type 2 diabetes independent of established risk factors for diabetes, such as socioeconomic factors, lifestyle factors, and markers of the metabolic syndrome. The comorbidity between depression and anxiety may be the most important factor.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.07.009

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 330

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Engum, A.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Engum, Anne
ORCID
Engum, Anne
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
31-38
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.07.009
OpenAlex
W2082437852
Cited by
330
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 26
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
depression, anxiety, type 2 diabetes, diabetes onset, incident diabetes risk, comorbid depression and anxiety, mediation, psychosocial risk factors, metabolic syndrome
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Prospective Studies, Statistics as Topic, Comorbidity, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review