Cited by 908Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale: Factor structure, item analyses and internal consistency in a large population

Open access
Mykletun, Arnstein, Stordal, Eystein, Dahl, Alv A.·2001·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) rating scale is a commonly used questionnaire. Former studies have given inconsistent results as to the psychometric properties of the HAD scale. Aims: To examine the psychometric properties of the HAD scale in a large population. Method: All inhabitants aged 20–89 years (n=92 100) were invited to take part in The Nord-Tr⊘ndelag Health Study, Norway. A total of 65 648 subjects participated, and only completed HAD scale forms (n=51 930) formed the basis for the psychometric examinations. Results: Principal component analysis extracted two factors in the HAD scale that accounted for 57% of the variance. The anxiety and depression sub-scales shared 30% of the variance. Both sub-scales were found to be internally consistent, with values of Cronbach's coefficient (a) being 0.80 and 0.76, respectively. Conclusions: Based on data from a large population, the basic psychometric properties of the HAD scale as a self-rating instrument should be considered as quite good in terms of factor structure, intercorrelation, homogeneity and internal consistency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.179.6.540

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mykletun, A., Stordal, E., & Dahl, A. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Mykletun, Arnstein
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2001-12
Volume
179
Issue
6
Pages
540-544
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2106572906
Cited by
908
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 56
FWCI
21.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, psychometric properties, factor structure, internal consistency, anxiety, depression, self-report questionnaire, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, item analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review