Cited by 440Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth and Well-being StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: Tests of the universality of Quality of Life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide

Power, M., The World Health Organization Quality of Life Group, Bullinger, M., Harper, A.·1999·Health Psychology

Abstract

The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL-100) was developed simultaneously across 15 international field centers and includes 24 facets relating to quality of life, which are grouped into 4 larger domains: physical, psychological, social relationships, and environment. It also includes 1 facet examining overall quality of life and general health perceptions. This article examines the extent to which the WHOQOL-100 assesses quality of life perceptions in different cultures and whether it is structurally comparable in these cultures. Regression analysis showed all 4 domains to be important in assessing quality of life in each of the 15 centers. Structural equation modeling suggested further support for the proposal that there are universal facets and domains that are cross-culturally important in determining quality of life and suggested that the ordering of facets within domains is comparable across cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.18.5.495

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Power, M., The World Health Organization Quality of Life Group, Bullinger, M., & Harper, A.
Affiliations
Royal Edinburgh Hospital (GB)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
1999
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
495-505
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W1967870652
Cited by
440
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
WHOQOL-100, quality of life, cross-cultural comparability, cultural differences, health-related quality of life, physical health, mental health, interpersonal relationships, living environment, health perception, structural equation modeling
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, World Health Organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review