Cited by 157Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationPsychology of Social Influence

“Do the right thing:” The effects of moral suasion on cooperation

Dal Bó, Ernesto, Dal Bó, Pedro·2014·Journal of Public Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.05.002

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Providing cues that make the morality of an action salient have also been shown to increase cooperation.

    “Providing cues that make the morality of an action salient (such as having people read the Golden Rule before making a decision or asking them to report what they think is the morally right thing to do) have also been shown to increase cooperation 189,190 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dal Bó, E., & Dal Bó, P.
Venue
Journal of Public Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
117
Pages
28-38
ISSN
0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013218718
Cited by
157
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
27.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
moral suasion, moral appeals, cooperation, voluntary contribution game, golden rule, utilitarianism, punishment, social norms, preferences, transient effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review